Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the SAMSIL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of SAMSIL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to SAMSIL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
60A84P022583NE165029Samsil8Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.961113,-103.5444412
6411N0097S2010SD103008Samsil6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.9022778,-102.4225556

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the SAMSIL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the SAMSIL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SAMSIL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SAMSIL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with SAMSIL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SAMSIL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SAMSIL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with SAMSIL, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. CO-2011-05-27-06 | Crowley County - 1968

    Relationship of soils to typography and underlying material in association 5 (Soil Survey of Crowley County, Colorado; 1968).

  2. CO-2011-05-27-08 | Otero County - 1972

    Minnequa-Penrose association (Soil Survey of Otero County, Colorado; 1972).

  3. CO-2011-05-27-11 | Otero County - 1972

    Cross section of Otero County showing relief, drainage, and relation of soils to underlying geologic formations (Soil Survey of Otero County, Colorado; 1972).

  4. SD-2012-03-15-11 | Custer and Pennington Counties, Prairie Parts - May 1996

    Pattern of soils, topography, and underlying material in the Nunn-Satanta association (Soil Survey of Custer and Pennington Counties, Prairie Parts, SD; 1996).

  5. SD-2012-03-15-12 | Custer and Pennington Counties, Prairie Parts - May 1996

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Bankard-Haverson-Lohmiller and the Samsil-Pierre associations (Soil Survey of Custer and Pennington Counties, Prairie Parts, SD; 1996).

  6. SD-2012-03-15-31 | Fall River County - April 1982

    Pattern of soils in the Pierre-Samsil association (Soil Survey of Fall River County, SD; 1982).

  7. SD-2012-03-15-38 | Haakon County - 1998

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Bankard-Craft-Wendte, Ree, and Samsil-Pierre associations (Soil Survey of Haakon County, SD; 1998).

  8. SD-2012-03-15-39 | Haakon County - 1998

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Nimbro, Samsil-Pierre, and Kirley-Lakoma-Vivian associations (Soil Survey of Haakon County, SD; 1998).

  9. SD-2012-03-15-53 | Jackson County, Northern Part - July 1987

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Samsil-Pierre and Haverson associations (Soil Survey of Jackson County, Northern Part, SD; 1987).

  10. SD-2012-03-15-54 | Jackson County, Northern Part - July 1987

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Pierre-Promise association (Soil Survey of Jackson County, Northern Part, SD; 1987).

  11. SD-2012-03-15-72 | Meade County, Northern Part - January 1986

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Samsil association (Soil Survey of Meade County, Northern Part, SD; 1986).

  12. SD-2012-03-15-94 | Shannon County - April 1971

    Representative pattern of soils in association 6 (Soil Survey of Shannon County, SD; 1971).

  13. SD-2012-03-15-96 | Todd County - April 1974

    Typical pattern of soils in association 1 (Soil Survey of Todd County, SD; 1974).

  14. SD-2012-03-16-04 | Ziebach County - March 1990

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Samsil-Pierre association (Soil Survey of Ziebach County, SD; 1990).

Map Units

Map units containing SAMSIL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Samsil-Shingle complex, 3 to 35 percent slopesShF70439407134wkco00119681:20000
Samsil clay, 3 to 20 percent slopesSaE20049407034wjco00119681:20000
Samsil-Renohill clay loams, 3 to 20 percent slopesSrE54659415534z8co00519711:20000
Litle-Samsil, gypsum, silty clay loams, 3 to 9 percent slopesLsD48479414034ysco00519711:20000
Samsil clay, gypsum, 5 to 20 percent slopesSaE42229415334z6co00519711:20000
Samsil-Shale outcrop complexSs41689415634z9co00519711:20000
Samsil-Litle stony clays, 20 to 50 percent slopesSlF7689415434z7co00519711:20000
Samsil gravelly soils, hillySa77401104653pydco08719651:24000
Samsil-Chicosa complex, cool, 1 to 25 percent slopes7793324965172t512co62719801:24000
Samsil clay, cool, 1 to 20 percent slopes4659484964832t522co62719801:24000
Samsil clay, cool, 1 to 20 percent slopesMyE2445232237522t522co62820081:24000
Samsil-Chicosa complex, cool, 1 to 25 percent slopesMIK1228132237572t512co62820081:24000
Samsil-Shingle complex, 5 to 25 percent slopesSeE1813210264jpsrco64119801:24000
Samsil-Shingle complex, 5 to 25 percent slopesSeE5500497604jpsrco64319751:20000
Samsil clay, 3 to 12 percent slopesSaD2614497603jpsqco64319751:20000
Fairburn-Samsil-Badland complex, 10 to 45 percent slopes278246013877602wlrlmt64319671:20000
Cromack-Samsil clay loams, 3 to 15 percent slopes2671213877551hl29mt64319671:20000
Samsil silty clay, 3 to 30 percent slopes524055907625693p02nne04519731:20000
Samsil-Rock outcrop complex, 10 to 50 percent slopes524335433581592t5f5ne04519731:20000
Pierre-Samsil, moderately deep silty clays, 6 to 25 percent slopes5241283626688592s03tne04519731:20000
Pierre-Samsil, moderately deep silty clays, 6 to 25 percent slopes52413400726688582s03tne16519931:20000
Samsil-Rock outcrop complex, 10 to 50 percent slopes524327683580032t5f5ne16519931:20000
Samsil silty clay loam, moist, 6 to 25 percent slopesP436D8426688792rxtzsd01919701:24000
Pierre-Samsil, moderately deep clays, 6 to 25 percent slopesN667E7227845562s03ssd01919701:24000
Samsil-Cromack complex, 10 to 30 percent slopesP438E427680982rxv1sd01919701:24000
Samsil clay, 15 to 40 percent slopesSaE2562427680472qp1rsd04719801:24000
Mathias, very stony-Samsil-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 30 percent slopesP226E2464327331352rwdzsd04719801:24000
Pierre-Samsil, moderately deep silty clays, 6 to 25 percent slopesN668E1644526688532s03tsd04719801:24000
Pierre-Samsil, moderately deep clays, 6 to 25 percent slopesN667E455427845452s03ssd04719801:24000
Minnequa-Samsil silty clay loams, moist, 6 to 25 percent slopesP234E27927331372rvdtsd04719801:24000
Pierre-Samsil clays, 6 to 25 percent slopesP326D4127331462rvg9sd04719801:24000
Samsil clay, 15 to 45 percent slopesSbF537653541552xbnpsd05519921:24000
Pierre-Samsil clays, 15 to 25 percent slopesPkE36619354141cwhxsd05519921:24000
Schamber-Samsil complex, 6 to 60 percent slopesStF28977354162cwjlsd05519921:24000
Samsil-Rock outcrop complex, 9 to 60 percent slopesSdF201713541572ynv0sd05519921:24000
Samsil-Nihill complex, 6 to 40 percent slopesScF1590354156cwjdsd05519921:24000
Samsil-Pierre silty clay loams, 6 to 25 percent slopes637D509190052421sn7sd08120071:24000
Samsil-Pierre silty clay loams, moist, 6 to 25 percent slopesP442D12127333002rxv3sd08120071:24000
Samsil clay, 15 to 45 percent slopesSaF967693558862xbnpsd13719851:24000
Pierre-Samsil clays, 9 to 30 percent slopesPmD81791355863cy9gsd13719851:24000
Schamber-Samsil complex, 9 to 40 percent slopesShE6524355890cybbsd13719851:24000
Samsil-Rock outcrop complex, 9 to 60 percent slopesSdF54363558872ynv0sd13719851:24000
Samsil clay, 15 to 40 percent slopesSaE6616827680602qp1rsd60019741:24000
Samsil-Rock outcrop complex, 10 to 50 percent slopesScE183313543432t5f5sd60019741:24000
Pierre-Samsil, moderately deep clays, 6 to 25 percent slopesN667E769726688562s03ssd60019741:24000
Samsil silty clay loam, moist, 6 to 25 percent slopesP436D2627334272rxtzsd60019741:24000
Samsil clay, 6 to 25 percent slopesSaD310143554622wf3xsd60119831:24000
Samsil-Rock outcrop complex, 10 to 50 percent slopesSbE261473554632t5f5sd60119831:24000
Pierre-Samsil, moderately deep clays, 6 to 25 percent slopesN667E1088726688552s03ssd60119831:24000
Pierre-Samsil clays, 6 to 15 percent slopesPsD2753554602tj84sd60119831:24000
Samsil clay, 15 to 40 percent slopesSbF12234527680702qp1rsd60620111:24000
Pierre-Samsil, moderately deep clays, 6 to 25 percent slopesN667E8294226688572s03ssd60620111:24000
Samsil-Rock outcrop complex, 10 to 50 percent slopesSdF2291125809662t5f5sd60620111:24000
Schamber-Samsil complex, 15 to 40 percent slopesStE98662580977cyklsd60620111:24000
Samsil-Badland, shale complex, 6 to 60 percent slopesN712G373625828952kqtxsd60620111:24000
Pierre-Samsil clays, 6 to 30 percent slopesN666E181725828992pf8ysd60620111:24000
Samsil-Pierre, thin solum complex, 6 to 60 percent slopesN711G149425829002qp1ksd60620111:24000
Samsil-Pierre clays, 15 to 25 percent slopesScE4142580965cyk6sd60620111:24000
Samsil silty clay loam, 10 to 40 percent slopesN542F6825828982pf8gsd60620111:24000
Mathias, very stony-Samsil-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 30 percent slopesP226E167527681412rwdzsd60720111:24000
Samsil-Pierre clays, 9 to 25 percent slopesSpE107612925528cv6bsd61019651:20000
Samsil-Shale outcrop complex, 9 to 40 percent slopesSs34862925497cv6csd61019651:20000
Pierre-Samsil clays, 9 to 25 percent slopesPsE20122925527cv67sd61019651:20000
Pierre-Samsil clays, 6 to 15 percent slopesPsD5893125826562tj84sd61120111:24000
Samsil-Pierre clays, 15 to 25 percent slopesSpE368682582666cy41sd61120111:24000
Samsil clay, 15 to 45 percent slopesSaF1447625826642xbnpsd61120111:24000
Nihill-Samsil complex, 6 to 15 percent slopesNkD62322582642cy38sd61120111:24000
Samsil-Hisle-Rock outcrop complex, 6 to 25 percent slopesShE33562582665cy40sd61120111:24000
Samsil-Rock outcrop complex, 9 to 60 percent slopesSdF65325826672ynv0sd61120111:24000
Samsil-Pierre, thin solum complex, 6 to 60 percent slopesN711G643625172182qp1ksd61220111:20000
Pierre-Samsil clays, 6 to 30 percent slopesN666E277424854232pf8ysd61220111:20000
Samsil silty clay loam, 10 to 40 percent slopesN542F216724854082pf8gsd61220111:20000
Samsil-Badland, shale complex, 6 to 60 percent slopesN712G43523754342kqtxsd61220111:20000
Samsil-Rock outcrop complex, 10 to 50 percent slopesSs887325827342t5f5sd61320111:24000
Samsil-Pierre, thin solum complex, 6 to 60 percent slopesN711G141325828092qp1ksd61320111:24000
Pierre-Samsil clays, 6 to 30 percent slopesN666E63625828082pf8ysd61320111:24000
Samsil-Cromack complex, 10 to 30 percent slopesP438E5283427457992rxv1wy01119781:24000
Samsil-Gaynor complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes15619810349238cqdrwy01119781:24000
Orella-Samsil complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes13111614349211cqcwwy01119781:24000
Samsil-Cromack complex, 2 to 10 percent slopesP438C594027457982rxv0wy01119781:24000
Samsil-Gaynor complex, 10 to 30 percent slopes1575045349239cqdswy01119781:24000
Renohill-Gaynor clay loams, 3 to 10 percent slopes1484059349229cqdgwy01119781:24000
Renohill-Gaynor clay loams, 10 to 30 percent slopes1493947349230cqdhwy01119781:24000
Samsil-Gaynor complex, cool, 10 to 30 percent slopesQ0852E392724401032mx40wy01119781:24000
Samsil-Razor complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes1582873349240cqdtwy01119781:24000
Samsil-Razor complex, 10 to 30 percent slopes1592709349241cqdvwy01119781:24000
Razor-Samsil complex, 3 to 10 percent slopes14226823492232y6dlwy01119781:24000
Terry-Samsil complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes1831257349268cqfqwy01119781:24000
Cromack-Samsil complex, 3 to 10 percent slopesP104C55027457882qt2dwy01119781:24000
Samsil-Gaynor complex, cool, 2 to 10 percent slopesQ0852C49524401022mx3zwy01119781:24000
Samsil-Cromack complex, 10 to 30 percent slopesP438E88427460122rxv1wy04519841:24000
Samsil-Grummit complex, 2 to 30 percent slopesP440E28627460112rxv2wy04519841:24000
Samsil-Cromack complex, 2 to 10 percent slopesP438C927682062rxv0wy04519841:24000
Shingle-Kishona-Samsil, dry complex, 3 to 30 percent slopesSNd539503509312wxz4wy61919711:24000
Renohill-Razor-Samsil, dry complex, 6 to 20 percent slopesRED456143509132xtvfwy61919711:24000
Razor-Gaynor, dry-Samsil, dry complex, 6 to 30 percent slopesRAD411943509102xtvjwy61919711:24000
Limon-Gaynor associationLR9708350878cs3nwy61919711:24000
Samsil-Gaynor-Cadoma complex, rollingSCD6598350922cs52wy61919711:24000
Samsil-Renohill associationSE2893350924cs54wy61919711:24000
Renohill-Razor association, undulatingREC2405350912cs4rwy61919711:24000
Fairburn-Samsil-Badland complex, 10 to 45 percent slopes278628738176342wlrlwy70520031:24000
Fairburn-Samsil-Badland complex, wooded, 6 to 50 percent slopes279115088176462ztzmwy70520031:24000
Cromack-Samsil clay loams, 3 to 15 percent slopes26710151817627wft2wy70520031:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the SAMSIL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .