Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the HUNGRYHILL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of HUNGRYHILL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to HUNGRYHILL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the HUNGRYHILL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the HUNGRYHILL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HUNGRYHILL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HUNGRYHILL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with HUNGRYHILL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HUNGRYHILL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HUNGRYHILL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with HUNGRYHILL, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing HUNGRYHILL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Hungryhill, very stony-Dailybasin-Nieman, extremely stony families, complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes1167E147426322322qbzdmt6321:24000
Catlinsprings, extremely bouldery-Sebud, very stony, Hungryhill, stony families, complex, 12 to 35 percent slopes1152E46227246352sh7vmt6321:24000
Bullrey-Hungryhill-Larkspur complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes, very stony504E29417031731v592mt63520061:24000
Eastridge-Hungryhill-Poin complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes, very stony515F16317031761v595mt63520061:24000
Bridger-Eastridge-Hungryhill complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes, very stony503F9217031721v591mt63520061:24000
Euell-Hungryhill-Bullrey complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes542D7217031851v59gmt63520061:24000
Hungryhill-Euell complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes, very stony541F5717031841v59fmt63520061:24000
Hungryhill-Poin-Larkspur complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes, stony532E4917031821v59cmt63520061:24000
Euell, very stony-Hungryhill, very stony-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes510F2317150481vkn4mt63520061:24000
Hungryhill-Poin-Larkspur complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes, stony532E2007320509brj0mt67020071:24000
Eastridge-Hungryhill-Poin complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes, very stony515F1562362007d4pnmt67020071:24000
Hungryhill, very stony-Euell, very stony-Poin extremely stony complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes536F1545320499brhpmt67020071:24000
Hungryhill-Savenac complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes, stony502E1419362014d4pwmt67020071:24000
Bullrey-Hungryhill-Larkspur complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes, very stony504E1238362013d4pvmt67020071:24000
Bridger-Eastridge-Hungryhill complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes, very stony503F972361845d4jfmt67020071:24000
Bigbutte-Hungryhill-Poin complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes, very stony537E941320508brhzmt67020071:24000
Whitlash, very stony-Rock outcrop-Hungryhill, very stony complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes573E639320356brc2mt67020071:24000
Euell, very stony-Hungryhill, very stony-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes510F623361844d4jdmt67020071:24000
Hungryhill-Euell complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes, very stony541F590320500brhqmt67020071:24000
Euell-Hungryhill-Bullrey complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes542D588362008d4ppmt67020071:24000
Hungryhill-Euell-Larkspur complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes, stony511E564362012d4ptmt67020071:24000
Evaro-Coslaw-Hungryhill complex, 15 to 50 percent slopes568F524361846d4jgmt67020071:24000
Hungryhill-Euell-Poin complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes514E519320504brhvmt67020071:24000
Poin, extremely stony-Hungryhill, very stony complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes750F31814247761jtljmt67020071:24000
Hungryhill-Euell-Bullrey complex, 8 to 45 percent slopes, stony546E254320362brc8mt67020071:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the HUNGRYHILL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .