Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ZANEIS soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ZANEIS, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ZANEIS were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
80A72-OK-60-472-OK119-60-4Zaneis4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.151775,-97.3159778
80A90P070990OK083002Zaneis5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.1005554,-97.4588852
80A91P087491OK083003Zaneis6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.0066681,-97.4597244
80A90P0708S1990OK083001Zaneis6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.086113,-97.3888855
84A91P0904S1991OK109003Zaneis6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties35.7247238,-97.4563904

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ZANEIS soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ZANEIS series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ZANEIS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ZANEIS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ZANEIS share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ZANEIS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ZANEIS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ZANEIS, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. OK-2010-09-29-06 | Logan County - 2006

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Coyle-Ironmound-Zaneis general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Logan County, Oklahoma; 2006).

  2. OK-2012-02-16-15 | Comanche County - August 1967

    Topography and underlying material of major soils in northeastern part of county (Soil Survey of Comanche County, Oklahoma; August 1967).

  3. OK-2012-02-16-17 | Comanche County - August 1967

    Topography and underlying material of Waurika soils and other extensive soils in southeastern part of county (Soil Survey of Comanche County, Oklahoma; August 1967).

  4. OK-2012-02-16-20 | Cotton County - December 1963

    Typical pattern of Zaneis, Lucien, and associated soils in the northeastern part of Cotton County (Soil Survey of Cotton County, Oklahoma; December 1963).

  5. OK-2012-02-16-23 | Cotton County - December 1963

    Schematic diagram showing the location of the Chickasha and other extensive soils in the east-central part of Cotton County (Soil Survey of Cotton County, Oklahoma; December 1963).

  6. OK-2012-02-16-33 | Garfield County - October 1967

    Typical pattern of soils in the Renfrow-Vernon-Kirkland association (Soil Survey of Garfield County, Oklahoma; October 1967).

  7. OK-2012-02-17-03 | Logan County - June 1960

    Soils of the Zaneis-Lucien-Chickasha and the Renfrow-Vernon-Kirkland associations on red clays, sandstone, siltstone, and alluvium. They have developed largely on the Wellington, Garber, and Hennessey formations that dip successively toward the west (Soil Survey of Logan County, Oklahoma; June 1960).

  8. OK-2012-02-17-08 | Love County - September 1966

    Diagram showing typical relief in the northwestern corner of the county and the relative positions of the soils in association 4 (Soil Survey of Love County, Oklahoma; September 1966).

  9. OK-2012-02-17-15 | Oklahoma County - February 1969

    Typical pattern of soils in soil association 2 (Soil Survey of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma; February 1969).

  10. OK-2012-02-17-22 | Pawnee County - March 1959

    Prairie soils of western Pawnee County formed in clay and sandy strata of the Permian "redbeds" area, and in accompanying alluvium (Soil Survey of Pawnee County, Oklahoma; March 1959).

  11. OK-2012-02-17-27 | Payne County - April 1987

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Renfrow-Coyle-Grainola map unit (Soil Survey of Payne County, Oklahoma; April 1987).

  12. OK-2012-02-17-51 | Stephens County - 1964

    Typical pattern of soils in associations 6, 7, and 8 (Soil Survey of Stephens County, Oklahoma; 1964).

Map Units

Map units containing ZANEIS as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes581437382044dtk0ok01919771:24000
Zaneis-Huska complex, 1 to 3 percent slopesZsB439423822182tq65ok03119651:24000
Lucien-Grainola-Zaneis complex, 5 to 12 percent slopesLzD3601238219130c0kok03119651:24000
Zaneis and Stephenville soils, 2 to 8 percent slopes, severely erodedEt1737138217230c0tok03119651:24000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, moderately erodedZaC2145953822172tq6yok03119651:24000
Zaneis loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesZaB102013822152tp4jok03119651:24000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesZaC89613822162tp4lok03119651:24000
Zaneis-Huska complex, 1 to 3 percent slopesZsB285353822632tq65ok03319611:24000
Zaneis-Grainola-Lucien complex, 5 to 20 percent slopesLz16242382237dtr7ok03319611:24000
Zaneis loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesZaB107803822592tp4jok03319611:24000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, moderately erodedZaC233093822612tq6yok03319611:24000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesZaC12193822602tp4lok03319611:24000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, severely erodedZn33553822622tq6xok03319611:24000
Zaneis-Huska complex, 1 to 5 percent slopesZaHC1025163592tq6vok03719521:24000
Zaneis loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesZaB11203825362tp4jok04719651:24000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, moderately erodedZaC27173825382tq6yok04719651:24000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesZaC5553825372tp4lok04719651:24000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, moderately eroded88190493826242tq6yok04919821:24000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, gullied896739382625dv4rok04919821:24000
Zaneis loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes8662083826222tp4jok04919821:24000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes8750063826232tp4lok04919821:24000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, moderately eroded65289543826882tq6yok05119751:24000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, severely eroded66208603826892tq6xok05119751:24000
Zaneis loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes6359473826862tp4jok05119751:24000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes6431143826872tp4lok05119751:24000
Zaneis-Pawhuska complex, 0 to 3 percent slopesZwB1405553832702wrk7ok06719671:24000
Zaneis, Lucien, and Grainola soils, 5 to 12 percent slopesZvD1073023832692xm2mok06719671:24000
Zaneis loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesZaB102393832662tp4jok06719671:24000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, moderately erodedZaC222023832682tq6yok06719671:24000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesZaC20363832672tp4lok06719671:24000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesZaC38643835492tp4lok08119661:24000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, erodedZaC22857383550dw3lok08119661:24000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, moderately erodedZanC2184613836952tq6yok08319941:12000
Zaneis loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesZanB84073836932tp4jok08319941:12000
Zaneis-Huska complex, 3 to 5 percent slopesZaHC5484383692dw85ok08319941:12000
Coyle and Zaneis soils, 3 to 5 percent slopes, severely erodedCoZC341853836012wrk5ok08319941:12000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesZanC7013836942tp4lok08319941:12000
Zaneis and Durant soils, 1 to 5 percent slopes, severely erodedEt2219383713dw8vok08519631:24000
Chickasha and Zaneis soils, 1 to 3 percent slopesChB879383700dw8fok08519631:24000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesZaC493383763dwbgok08519631:24000
Zaneis-Huska complex, 1 to 5 percent slopesZaHC68063841272tq6vok10319941:24000
Coyle and Zaneis soils, 3 to 5 percent slopes, severely erodedCoZC326823840412wrk5ok10319941:24000
Zaneis loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesZanB2773841282tp4jok10319941:24000
Zaneis loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesZanB11273843792tp4jok10919961:12000
Zaneis-Urban land complex, 1 to 5 percent slopesZaUC660384378dwz9ok10919961:12000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesZanC6573843802tp4lok10919961:12000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, moderately erodedZanC25363843812tq6yok10919961:12000
Zaneis-Huska complex, 1 to 5 percent slopesZaHC587514231932tq6vok11720071:24000
Zaneis-Huska complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes, erodedZaHC292018837992177qok11720071:24000
Zaneis loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesZanB66514231922tp4jok11720071:24000
Coyle and Zaneis soils, 3 to 5 percent slopes, severely erodedCoZC322516770212wrk5ok11720071:24000
Zaneis-Huska complex, 1 to 5 percent slopesZaHC1045819076492tq6vok11919831:24000
Coyle and Zaneis soils, 3 to 5 percent slopes, severely eroded7673233845772wrk5ok11919831:24000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, moderately eroded7131093845722tq6yok11919831:24000
Zaneis loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesZanB131619076482tp4jok11919831:24000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes7012393845712tp4lok11919831:24000
Chickasha and Zaneis soils and Gullied land, 1 to 8 percent slopes, severely eroded8168493847232yhdyok12519751:24000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes57113713847202tp4lok12519751:24000
Zaneis loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes5629713847192tp4jok12519751:24000
Zaneis-Grainola-Lucien complex, 5 to 12 percent slopesLz37710384867dxh2ok13719601:24000
Zaneis-Ashport frequently flooded complex, 0 to 12 percent slopesBa24234384846dxgdok13719601:24000
Zaneis loam, 5 to 8 percent slopesZaD13425384897dxj1ok13719601:24000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesZaC105083848952tp4lok13719601:24000
Chickasha and Zaneis soils and Gullied land, 1 to 8 percent slopes, severely erodedEt88893848612yhdyok13719601:24000
Zaneis loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, moderately erodedZaC240083848962tq6yok13719601:24000
Zaneis loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesZaB34753848942tp4jok13719601:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ZANEIS soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .