Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the WHITESAGE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of WHITESAGE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to WHITESAGE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the WHITESAGE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the WHITESAGE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the WHITESAGE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the WHITESAGE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with WHITESAGE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the WHITESAGE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the WHITESAGE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with WHITESAGE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing WHITESAGE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Rootel-Skein-Whitesage complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes10D3611476474ymtmt60919711:24000
Cedarknoll-Tabyago-Whitesage association, 2 to 25 percent slopesJZE23619817096191vd00ut0131:24000
Whitesage-Dancehall complex, 3 to 20 percent slopesLaD1326925037162pvzqut0131:24000
Schrader, frequently flooded-Millburne, occasionally flooded-Whitesage complex, 2 to 10 percent slopesUoB294124964162pvzjut0131:24000
Wildmount-Whitesage association, 8 to 50 percent slopes27213532505553jz25ut04719991:24000
Whitesage-Cedarknoll complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes2707131505551jz23ut04719991:24000
Notter-Whitesage-Podo association, 3 to 20 percent slopes112229715366361nkzxut62320111:24000
Foy-Whitesage families complex, 2 to 35 percent slopes1872027130352qdqrut62320111:24000
Whitesage family-Wildmount complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes106128624855522pff3ut6421:63360
Whitesage-Tylercreek-Countyline complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes107120424526932nb74ut6421:63360
Foy-Whitesage families complex, 2 to 35 percent slopes26311525044842qdqrut68519901:24000
Whitesage-Rootel complex, 0 to 10 percent slopes55379914802101lp8qwy0411:24000
Millburne-Poposhia complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes62749115328917q2wwy0411:24000
Whitesage-Bronec-Bronec, very stony complex, 6 to 25 percent slopes152998186128220gtcwy0411:24000
Coyoteflats-Whitesage-Beavwan complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes130430190352xcd1wy6301:24000
Delpoint-Whitesage-Badland complex, 7 to 35 percent slopes8463365714312fkwy6301:24000
Cusheet-Delpoint-Whitesage complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes8633365735312g1wy6301:24000
Delpoint-Whitesage-Kayso complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes8693365742312gfwy6301:24000
Cragnot-Dullknife-Whitesage complex, 6 to 20 percent slopes976242415292121nb8fwy71920131:24000
Whitesage loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes -- draft515A5208503383jwt5wy7231:24000
Frandsen-Foreright-Whitesage complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes411932225032ztmfwy7371:24000
Bonhigh family-Rootel-Whitesage family, complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes2704628726119732qsvmwy7371:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the WHITESAGE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .