Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the TOPHAT soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of TOPHAT, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to TOPHAT were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the TOPHAT soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the TOPHAT series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TOPHAT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TOPHAT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with TOPHAT share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TOPHAT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TOPHAT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with TOPHAT, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing TOPHAT as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Edgway-Jumpstart-Tophat complex, 15 to 50 percent slopes130311770015042051j8id75819981:24000
Etnass-Nearl-Tophat complex, 4 to 30 percent slopes120978515040851hwid75819981:24000
Tophat, bouldery-Cowood, extremely stony complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes761D1326334542ppj5mt60520071:24000
Tophat cobbly loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes761E190425125582ppj6mt61220111:24000
Boatman, very stony-Tophat-Yellowmule complex, 15 to 50 percent slopes, landslides772F102325153812ppjbmt61220111:24000
Tophat, bouldery-Cowood, extremely stony complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes761D19125125572ppj5mt61220111:24000
Blaine-Tophat-Dalys complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes5645F58672496362rgqmmt6321:24000
Tophat-Adel-Bangtail complex, 4 to 25 percent slopes5547E3732496365swkymt6321:24000
Blaine-Tophat-Dalys complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes5645F30982493527rgqmmt63720141:24000
Tophat-Adel-Bangtail complex, 4 to 25 percent slopes5547E5712493530swkymt63720141:24000
Copenhaver-Mollet-Tophat complex, 4 to 60% slopes5508E793815647357tjmt6691:24000
Bachus-Gilispie-Tophat complex, 4 to 35 percent slopes5507E592615647257thmt6691:24000
Tophat-Woodhurst, cobbly-Decross, complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes5434E5348741479swkpmt6691:24000
Blaine-Tophat-Dalys complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes5645F3427699348rgqmmt6691:24000
Tophat-Adel-Bangtail complex, 4 to 25 percent slopes5547E2645741487swkymt6691:24000
Tophat, moist-Foolhen complex, 4 to 35 percent slopes5535E897699255rgmmmt6691:24000
Shedhorn-Tophat-Ripple, extremely stony families, complex, 3 to 25 percent slopes981263816529wdnnut6511:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the TOPHAT soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .