Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the TOEM soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of TOEM, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to TOEM were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
22A00P03121999NV031011Toem6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.2748333,-119.9179139
22A00P03111999NV031013Toem6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.2712222,-119.913975
22A00P03681999NV031017Toem6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.2706528,-119.9651889
22A00P0370S1999CA061019Toem6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.2719955,-119.9643097
22A68C0086S68CA017023TOEM4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.8976972,-119.934025
22A00P0351S99CA017038Toem6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.0193611,-120.1575361

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the TOEM soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the TOEM series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TOEM series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TOEM series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with TOEM share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TOEM series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TOEM series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with TOEM, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. CA-2010-08-30-01 | Tahoe Basin Area, California and Nevada - 2007

    Representative diagram of the Meiss Meadow area (not to scale). The Sky-Callat general soil map unit is in this area (Soil Survey of the Tahoe Basin Area, California and Nevada; 2007).

  2. CA-2010-08-30-03 | Tahoe Basin Area, California and Nevada - 2007

    Representative diagram of the Freel Peak area (not to scale). The Whittell-Jobsis-Rock outcrop general soil map unit is in this area (Soil Survey of the Tahoe Basin Area, California and Nevada; 2007).

Map Units

Map units containing TOEM as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Toem-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes753250516521741sg6yca69320061:24000
Toem-Rock outcrop complex, 50 to 70 percent slopes753349816521751sg6zca69320061:24000
Toem-Rock outcrop complex, 9 to 30 percent slopes753122916521731sg6xca69320061:24000
Toem-Cagwin families complex, 2 to 55 percent slopes.270p4215287881n9trca70819841:24000
Cagwin-Toem families complex, 2 to 70 percent slopes.10945688471118ht7cca71319841:24000
Toem-Cagwin families complex, 2 to 55 percent slopes.27029723471279htdkca71319841:24000
Cagwin-Toem-Rock outcrop complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes60924217465215hm2yca76019811:24000
Rock outcrop-Toem complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes41020414465186hm20ca76019811:24000
Toem-Rock outcrop-Cagwin complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes60617135465213hm2wca76019811:24000
Toem-Rock outcrop-Cagwin complex, 30 to 75 percent slopes60711073465214hm2xca76019811:24000
Rock outcrop-Toem-Sirretta complex, 10 to 30 percent slopes40910084465185hm1zca76019811:24000
Rock outcrop-Toem complex, 50 to 75 percent slopes4119685465187hm21ca76019811:24000
Cagwin-Toem rock outcrop complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes6107579465216hm2zca76019811:24000
Cagwin-Toem rock outcrop complex, 50 to 75 percent slopes6113379465217hm30ca76019811:24000
Cagwin-Toem-Monache association, moderately steep6393093465231hm3gca76019811:24000
Cagwin-Toem-Monache association, steep6402793465232hm3hca76019811:24000
Nanny family-Toem complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes6281143465227hm3bca76019811:24000
Cagwin-Toem complex, 30 to 75 percent slopes741324627172nnnhnv62919751:24000
Toem-Rock outcrop complex, 50 to 75 percent slopes6640224627762nnqdnv62919751:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the TOEM soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .