Soil Data Explorer - TINTON

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the TINTON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of TINTON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to TINTON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
149A	92P0481	92NJ005008	Tinton	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	40.1294441,-74.6030579
149A	92P0493	92NJ033005	Tinton	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	39.6969452,-75.3327789
149A	92P0496	92NJ033008	Tinton	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	39.7244453,-75.4052811

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the TINTON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the TINTON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the TINTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the TINTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with TINTON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the TINTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TINTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with TINTON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing TINTON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Tinton loamy sand, 2 to 5 percent slopes	TsB	570	137830	4mf4	md003	2003	1:12000
Tinton loamy sand, 5 to 10 percent slopes	TsC	539	137831	4mf5	md003	2003	1:12000
Tinton-Urban land complex, 5 to 10 percent slopes	TuC	228	137833	4mf7	md003	2003	1:12000
Tinton-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes	TuB	147	137832	4mf6	md003	2003	1:12000
Tinton sand, thick surface, 0 to 5 percent slopes	ThftB	3676	697887	rf6h	nj005	1967	1:24000
Tinton sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes	ThfB	2127	697885	rf6f	nj005	1967	1:24000
Tinton sand, 5 to 10 percent slopes	ThfC	330	697886	rf6g	nj005	1967	1:24000
Tinton-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes	ThhB	274	3347363	2ztyc	nj007	1964	1:12000
Tinton sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes	ThfB	151	710903	rvrc	nj007	1964	1:12000
Tinton sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes	ThfB	454	1089572	15ksh	nj015	2004	1:24000
Tinton loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes	ThgB	698	135219	4jpx	nj021	1969	1:24000
Tinton loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes	ThgB	287	135450	4jyc	nj023	1985	1:24000
Tinton loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes	ThgB	10311	134815	4j8w	nj025	1985	1:24000
Tinton-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes	ThhB	5772	134818	4j8z	nj025	1985	1:24000
Tinton loamy sand, 5 to 10 percent slopes	ThgC	4196	134816	4j8x	nj025	1985	1:24000
Tinton loamy sand, 10 to 25 percent slopes	ThgE	2027	134817	4j8y	nj025	1985	1:24000
Tinton sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes	ThfB	608	697547	rdvj	nj029	1978	1:24000
Tinton loamy sand, 0to 5 percent slopes	ThgB	527	697618	rdxt	nj029	1978	1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the TINTON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).