Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the TACONIC soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of TACONIC, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to TACONIC were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
144B01N0948S2001CT005002Taconic6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.0124855,-73.4648209
14578P0348S1978VT025009Taconic6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.190834,-72.4583359

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the TACONIC soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the TACONIC series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TACONIC series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TACONIC series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with TACONIC share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TACONIC series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TACONIC series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with TACONIC, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. MA-2012-02-01-06 | Berkshire County - February 1988

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Taconic-Macomber-Lanesboro general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Berkshire County, Massachusetts; February 1988).

  2. VT-2012-03-22-07 | Rutland County - 1998

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Dutchess-Bomoseen-Pittstown unit (Soil Survey of Rutland County, VT; 1998).

  3. VT-2012-03-22-15 | Windham County - February 1987

    Typical landscape pattern of soils and underlying material in the Dummerston-Macomber-Taconic general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Windham County, VT; 1987).

Map Units

Map units containing TACONIC as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Macomber-Taconic complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes, very rocky401C198633958679lscct60120031:12000
Taconic-Rock outcrop complex, 45 to 70 percent slopes403F92233958709lsgct60120031:12000
Taconic-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes403E76533958699lsfct60120031:12000
Taconic-Macomber-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes402D41533958689lsdct60120031:12000
Taconic-Rock outcrop complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes403C13933958939lt7ct60120031:12000
Taconic-Macomber association, steep, very stony932E3666827665398w9ma00319841:25000
Taconic-Macomber association, rolling, very stony932C1195627665298w8ma00319841:25000
Macomber-Taconic complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes, very rocky152F5182790079cb7ma01120121:12000
Taconic-Macomber-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes153C3972790069cb6ma01120121:12000
Macomber-Taconic complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, very rocky152D2962790149cbgma01120121:12000
Macomber-Taconic complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, very rocky152C2732790159cbhma01120121:12000
Macomber-Taconic complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes, very rocky152B1802790169cbjma01120121:12000
Macomber-Taconic association, steep, very rockyMbE216202903619r4hny02119851:15840
Taconic-Macomber association, very steep, very rockyTmF109372902939r29ny02119851:15840
Macomber-Taconic association, strongly sloping, rockyMaC86772903609r4gny02119851:15840
Taconic-Rock outcrop complex, very steepTrF9232907249rj6ny02719921:24000
Taconic-Rock outcrop complex, steepTrE6112907239rj5ny02719921:24000
Macomber-Taconic complex, rolling, very rockyMcC5292906959rh8ny02719921:24000
Taconic-Macomber-Rock outcrop complex, hillyTmD4882907229rj4ny02719921:24000
Macomber-Taconic channery silt loams, very rocky, steepMaE95892931819v2gny08319801:15840
Macomber-Taconic channery silt loams, very rocky, very steepMaF61312931829v2hny08319801:15840
Macomber-Taconic channery silt loams, very rocky, slopingMaC14942931809v2fny08319801:15840
Macomber-Taconic complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes, rocky42E159162814939fxfvt00319921:20000
Macomber-Taconic complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, rocky42D67832814929fxdvt00319921:20000
Taconic-Macomber complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes, very rocky43E67682814969fxjvt00319921:20000
Taconic-Macomber complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, very rocky43D41992814959fxhvt00319921:20000
Macomber-Taconic complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, rocky42C34842814919fxcvt00319921:20000
Taconic-Macomber complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, very rocky43C11072814949fxgvt00319921:20000
Taconic-Hubbardton-Rock outcrop complex, 25 to 70 percent slopes, very stony11F8252813959ft8vt00319921:20000
Taconic-Hubbardton-Macomber complex, 25 to 80 percent slopes, very rocky12F403092821549glrvt02119851:20000
Taconic-Macomber complex, 8 to 25 percent slopes, very rocky43C252182823369gsmvt02119851:20000
Macomber-Taconic complex, 25 to 80 percent slopes, rocky42F182792823349gskvt02119851:20000
Macomber-Taconic complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, rocky42D160542823329gshvt02119851:20000
Taconic-Hubbardton complex, 8 to 25 percent slopes, very rocky11C154602821269gkvvt02119851:20000
Macomber-Taconic complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, rocky42C142502823319gsgvt02119851:20000
Taconic-Hubbardton-Rock outcrop complex, 60 to 80 percent slopes172F13352825679h12vt02319961:20000
Macomber-Taconic complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, very rocky69D86202820699gj0vt02519841:20000
Macomber-Taconic complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, very rocky69C63882820689ghzvt02519841:20000
Macomber-Taconic complex, 25 to 70 percent slopes, very rocky69E51212820709gj1vt02519841:20000
Taconic-Hubbardton-Rock outcrop complex, 25 to 70 percent slopes68E37202820679ghyvt02519841:20000
Taconic-Hubbardton-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 25 percent slopes68D34752820669ghxvt02519841:20000
Macomber-Taconic complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, very rocky80D14332833149ht5vt02720001:20000
Macomber-Taconic complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, very rocky80C6062833139ht4vt02720001:20000
Macomber-Taconic complex, 25 to 70 percent slopes, very rocky80F5362833159ht6vt02720001:20000
Taconic-Hubbardton-Rock outcrop complex, 25 to 70 percent slopes81F472833169ht7vt02720001:20000
Taconic-Hubbardton-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 25 percent slopes81D152833179ht8vt02720001:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the TACONIC soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .