Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the STONELAKE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of STONELAKE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to STONELAKE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the STONELAKE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the STONELAKE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the STONELAKE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the STONELAKE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with STONELAKE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the STONELAKE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the STONELAKE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with STONELAKE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. MN-2010-09-10-12 | Sherburne County -

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Nebish-Braham-Stonelake association (Soil Survey of Sherburne County, Minnesota).

  2. MN-2010-09-10-13 | Sherburne County -

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Stonelake-Sanburn-Pierz association (Soil Survey of Sherburne County, Minnesota).

Map Units

Map units containing STONELAKE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Stonelake-Sanburn complex, 1 to 6 percent slopesD9B85733182sly1mn00920071:12000
Stonelake-Sanburn complex, 15 to 40 percent slopesD9E42733184sly3mn00920071:12000
Stonelake-Sanburn complex, 6 to 15 percent slopesD9C34733183sly2mn00920071:12000
Stonelake-Sanburn complex, 7 to 18 percent slopes, moderately eroded1253D215924627082nnn6mn05919561:20000
Stonelake-Sanburn complex, 2 to 7 percent slopes1253B9524626892nnmlmn05919561:20000
Stonelake-Sanburn complex, 7 to 18 percent slopes1253D6824627072nnn5mn05919561:20000
Stonelake-Sanburn complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded1253E32824627102nnn8mn05919561:20000
Stonelake-Sanburn complex, 1 to 6 percent slopesD9B216764731t8hsmn09520061:12000
Stonelake-Sanburn complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes1253B3442431438ggycmn14119941:15840
Stonelake-Sanburn complex, 6 to 15 percent slopes1253C3307431439ggydmn14119941:15840
Stonelake-Nebish complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes1260B1835431448ggypmn14119941:15840
Stonelake-Sanburn complex, 15 to 40 percent slopes1253E1758431440ggyfmn14119941:15840
Stonelake-Nebish complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes1260C1332431449ggyqmn14119941:15840
Stonelake-Nebish complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes1260E870431450ggyrmn14119941:15840
Stonelake-Nebish, moderately wet, complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes1260B298435037glpgmn17119981:12000
Stonelake-Nebish complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes1260C221435036glpfmn17119981:12000
Stonelake-Nebish complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes1260E169435087glr2mn17119981:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the STONELAKE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .