Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ROCKLAND soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ROCKLAND, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ROCKLAND were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ROCKLAND soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ROCKLAND series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ROCKLAND series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ROCKLAND series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ROCKLAND share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ROCKLAND series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ROCKLAND series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ROCKLAND, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. MI-2010-09-10-20 | Ontonagon County -

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Rockland-Moquah association (Soil Survey of Ontonagon County, Michigan).

  2. TN-2012-03-19-22 | Maury County - October 1959

    Sketch showing relative positions of soils in the Rockland-Talbott-Hagerstown (rocky) and Talbott-Hagerstown-Rockland assciations (Soil Survey of Maury County, TN; 1959).

  3. TN-2012-03-19-23 | Maury County - October 1959

    Sketch showing relative positions of soils in the Etowah-Huntington (local allvuium phosphatic phase)-Emory and Huntington-Lindside-Armour (terrace phases)-Egam assciations (Soil Survey of Maury County, TN; 1959).

  4. TN-2012-03-19-41 | Williamson County - August 1964

    Major and minor soils and underlying parent materials in the Rockland-Talbott-Egam association (Soil Survey of Williamson County, TN; 1964).

Map Units

Map units containing ROCKLAND as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
RocklandRtF49366458355hcynca67919671:15840
Rock land-Lonetree complex, 10 to 100 percent slopesRtG2116498760jr01co62219681:20000
Rockland, 15 to 60 percent slopesRcF21850498080jq93co65819681:20000
Rockland-Gravelly land complex, 3 to 35 percent slopesRgE1630498081jq94co65819681:20000
Rockland-Stecum complex, 15 to 60 percent slopesRkF760498082jq95co65819681:20000
Rockland, canaan material, strongly slopingRkD124932852599ktxme61419601:20000
Rockland, canaan material, slopingRkC13682852589ktwme61419601:20000
Rockland-Arnheim, frequently flooded, complex, 0 to 70 percent slopes285F998814563571kwg8mi05320071:24000
Rockland silt loam, 35 to 70 percent slopes, stony452F100714561951kw91mi05320071:24000
Rockland-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes448F9714561871kw8smi05320071:24000
Rockland-Moquah, frequently flooded-Watton complex, 0 to 70 percent slopes125F1638214565521kwnkmi13120071:24000
Rockland-Moquah, frequently flooded, complex, 0 to 70 percent slopes169F1357714566101kwqfmi13120071:24000
Rockland silt loam, 35 to 70 percent slopes, stony155F944414565951kwpymi13120071:24000
Rockland-Negwegon-Moquah, frequently flooded, complex, 0 to 35 percent slopes170E562914566111kwqgmi13120071:24000
Rockland-Arnheim, frequently flooded, complex, 0 to 70 percent slopes8285F27716748871t6vmmi13120071:24000
Rockland-Bainville complex, 15 to 50 percent slopesRh47835345654clp4mt10919561:31680
Rockland-Flasher complex, 15 to 50 percent slopesRk8141345655clp5mt10919561:31680
Bridger-Rockland association, very steepBN39571467694xqhmt60019691:24000
Rockland (Barfield)Rc2598327618bzxbtn07119611:15840
RocklandRo2914525992knbhtn10519581:15840
Rockland limestone, moderately steepRe4010189954921rmstn60919551:20000
Rockland, limestone, slopingRd705189954821rmrtn60919551:20000
Rockland slate or quartzite, steepRf35189955021rmttn60919551:20000
Rockland-Arnheim, frequently flooded complex, 0 to 70 percent slopes5285F293517023661v4g1wi05120061:12000
Paulson-Rockland complex, 30 to 60 percent slopesPKF582315271453x8wy62319711:20000
Haterton-Huguston-Rockland complex, 10 to 30 percent slopes -- draft246194125730422r81xwy6301:24000
Haterton-Huguston-Rockland complex, 10 to 30 percent slopes -- draft316173925723512pb9xwy7371:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ROCKLAND soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .