Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the REDGAP soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of REDGAP, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to REDGAP were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the REDGAP soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the REDGAP series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the sibling sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the REDGAP series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the REDGAP series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with REDGAP share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the competing sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the REDGAP series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the REDGAP series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with REDGAP, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing REDGAP as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Redgap-Subwater complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes7805748327716452t6cfwy6351:24000
Poposhia-Redgap-Zagpeed complex, 0 to 10 percent slopes2243120325547372rc08wy6351:24000
Redgap-Subwater complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes780528629251112t6cfwy71319861:24000
Redgap-Merna complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes -- draft2237559525154402qcsqwy7231:24000
Redgap-Asholler complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes4414322249531338wy7371:24000
Scooby-Scooby, sodic surface-Redgap complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes4232322244430j6qwy7371:24000
Manns-Redgap complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes4237322244930j6wwy7371:24000
Scooby-Redgap-Sweetlette family, complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes4412322249331336wy7371:24000
Moyerson-Redgap-Corlett complex, 1 to 15 percent slopes420332222722zdt6wy7371:24000
Thermopolis family-Piceance-Redgap, very flaggy surface, complex, 4 to 35 percent slopes4220322234530j6bwy7371:24000
Forelle-Scooby-Redgap complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes4222322234730j6dwy7371:24000
Redgap-Chanute-Zeomont family complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes4224322234930j6gwy7371:24000
Forelle-Carmody, rubbly surface-Redgap complex, 2 to 25 percent slopes4225322235030j6hwy7371:24000
Thenipel-Redgap-Montlid family, frequently ponded, complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes4227322235230j6kwy7371:24000
Saltwells-Redgap family-Chanute complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes440232223642zjtnwy7371:24000
Poposhia-Redgap-Zagpeed complex, 0 to 10 percent slopes2243325925547302rc08wy7371:24000
Browtine-Redgap complex, 1 to 4 percent slopes -- draft2244308025547312rc09wy7371:24000
Redgap-Merna complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes -- draft2237125547552qcsqwy7371:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the REDGAP soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .