Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the QUANDER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of QUANDER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to QUANDER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
48A87P071287CO065001Quander7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.2772217,-106.327774
48A88P012388CO119001Quander5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.7236099,-105.1452789

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the QUANDER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the QUANDER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the QUANDER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the QUANDER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with QUANDER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the QUANDER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the QUANDER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with QUANDER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. WY-2012-03-23-01 | Fremont County, East Part and Dubois Area - July 1993

    Soils and their landscape positions as they relate to parent material, precipitation zones, and temperature regimes (Soil Survey of Fremont County, East Part and Dubois Area, WY; 1993).

Map Units

Map units containing QUANDER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Quander-Bushpark very gravelly loams, 5 to 40 percent slopes complex15113412497289k0xvco63719861:24000
Quander-Bushpark very gravelly loams, 5 to 40 percent slopes complex8223375507341k0xvco63820101:24000
Quander stony loam, 15 to 55 percent slopes66123106906jq32co6481:24000
Quander stony loam, 15 to 55 percent slopes6628136497893jq32co64919771:24000
Quander cobbly loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes656372497892jq31co64919771:24000
Quander family, till substratum, 5 to 40 percent slopes281B268914148901jh9mco6541:24000
Quander family, till substratum, 40 to 60 percent slopes281C52914148911jh9nco6541:24000
Quander-Youga complex, 15 to 55 percent slopesS17F3414148461jh86co6541:24000
Clayburn-Quander-Guero complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes12215788509470k34jco66019941:24000
Clayburn-Quander-Guero complex, 30 to 65 percent slopes1232126509471k34kco66019941:24000
Quander family, till substratum, 5 to 40 percent slopes281B33231769501jh9mco66119681:31680
Clayburn-Quander-Guero complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes12212927467k34jco66219681:24000
Tellura, moist-Quander complex, 5 to 25 percent slopes14229714505048jyjwco66320001:24000
Quander, cool-Bushpark-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes13315570505037jyjjco66320001:24000
Quander very gravelly loam, dry, 5 to 25 percent slopes1327813505039jyjlco66320001:24000
Cochedome-Quander, dry-Snowdon, warm complex, 25 to 65 percent slopes1045692505009jyhmco66320001:24000
Lagarita-Quander, dry complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes1225100505023jyj2co66320001:24000
Cochedome-Quander, dry-Snowdon, warm complex, 5 to 25 percent slopes1032814505008jyhlco66320001:24000
Goldpark-Quander, dry complex, 5 to 25 percent slopes1112254505016jyhvco66320001:24000
Quander-Seitz-Rock outcrop complex, 25 to 65 percent slopes1341462505040jyjmco66320001:24000
Quander loam, 5 to 25 percent slopes1311389505038jyjkco66320001:24000
Quander-Bushvalley association, 15 to 60 percent slopes1603043524536972nc8jco66419871:24000
Quander-Bowen association, 15 to 60 percent slopes1592528524536942nc8fco66419871:24000
Quander stony loam, 5 to 60 percent slopes1571862124536922nc8cco66419871:24000
Quander stony loam, cool, 15 to 50 percent slopes1581087724536932nc8dco66419871:24000
Quander-Cryaquolls-Cryohemists association, 1 to 30 percent slopes161919724536982nc8kco66419871:24000
Quander-Angostura-Mulgon complex, 20 to 65 percent slopes979708496944jp3gco68419841:24000
Cowdrey-Cochetopa-Quander loams, 5 to 25 percent slopes327452496873jp15co68419841:24000
Cochetopa-Gothic-Quander loams, 5 to 25 percent slopes257017496865jp0xco68419841:24000
Quander-Clayburn-Adel loams, 3 to 25 percent slopes994233496946jp3jco68419841:24000
Hapgood-Rhone-Quander loams, 20 to 65 percent slopes572364496900jp21co68419841:24000
Cochetopa-Gothic-Quander loams, 25 to 65 percent slopes262116496866jp0yco68419841:24000
Quander-Blackwell-Emerald loams, 3 to 15 percent slopes982043496945jp3hco68419841:24000
Cochetopa-Gourley-Quander complex, 5 to 25 percent slopes271870496867jp0zco68419841:24000
Quander cobbly loam, 15 to 55 percent slopes16E3922497294jpgrco69019741:24000
Quander cobbly loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes16D1430497293jpgqco69019741:24000
Quander-Youga complex, 15 to 55 percent slopes17F1290497295jpgsco69019741:24000
Quander cobbly loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes16C270497292jpgpco69019741:24000
Quander-Bowen, cool association, 15 to 60 percent slopes, stonyQbF6227701612tl91nm6721:24000
Quander-Cryaquolls, occasionally flooded-Cryohemists, frequently flooded, association, 1 to 30 percent slopes, stonyQcE4227701622tl92nm6721:24000
Hanson-Quander complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes1718043501712jv28wy60119911:24000
Leavitt-Quander complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes1837973501726jv2qwy60119911:24000
Surdal-Irson-Quander complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes, extremely stony -- Draft94025514702qts7wy6291:24000
Dailybasin-Odark-Quander, stony complex, 4 to 40 percent slopes740331369022ypq6wy6291:24000
Bavdark-Quander, stony-Dailybasin complex, 12 to 40 percent slopes740231369002ypq4wy6291:24000
Beavmid-like-Quander-Foolhen complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes -- Draft750225515092qttkwy6291:24000
Irson-Rock outcrop-Quander complex, 25 to 90 percent slopes, extremely stony -- Draft96025514712qts8wy6291:24000
Hanson-Quander complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes1171309325730522x8pcwy6301:24000
Leavitt-Quander complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes1183303525730532x8pdwy6301:24000
Foothill Sideslopes, Aspen-Big Sagebrush Complex66311662554706532twy6351:24000
Bavdark-Quander, stony-Dailybasin complex, 12 to 40 percent slopes740232533402ypq4wy65620081:24000
Foothill Sideslopes, Aspen-Big Sagebrush Complex66312739151925532twy66219981:24000
Quander-Youga-Onason complex, steep18818203503053jwgjwy71319861:24000
Youga-Quander complex, 2 to 25 percent slopes22312190503103jwj4wy71319861:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the QUANDER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .