Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the HAIRPIN soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of HAIRPIN, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to HAIRPIN were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the HAIRPIN soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the HAIRPIN series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HAIRPIN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HAIRPIN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with HAIRPIN share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HAIRPIN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HAIRPIN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with HAIRPIN, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing HAIRPIN as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Hairpin loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes, stony60D125724038292lpcwmt60520071:24000
Hairpin silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes5C676185951120dz7mt60520071:24000
Hairpin-Libeg, stony-Monad, stony complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes6D601185951220dz8mt60520071:24000
Hairpin-Libeg, very stony complex, 4 to 45 percent slopes, slumped12E447185951520dzcmt60520071:24000
Libeg, stony-Hairpin-Nieman, very stony complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes, mountains103E21624037942lpbrmt60520071:24000
Libeg, stony-Hairpin complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes103D11824037932lpbqmt60520071:24000
Libeg, stony-Hairpin-Nieman, very stony complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes3E4024038182lpcjmt60520071:24000
Finn-Slagamelt-Hairpin, stony complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes243C524038372lpd4mt60520071:24000
Hairpin-Libeg complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes160D5259802620g36mt60520071:24000
Hairpin-Libeg, stony-Monad, stony complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes6D10940806443w259mt61020051:24000
Hairpin silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes5C7715806294w20hmt61020051:24000
Hairpin-Libeg, very stony complex, 4 to 45 percent slopes, landslides12E3631806448w25gmt61020051:24000
Hairpin-Butchhill complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes7E1190806444w25bmt61020051:24000
Libeg, stony-Hairpin-Nieman, very stony complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes, mountains103E6885190219921vd8mt61220111:24000
Butchhill, very stony-Hairpin, frequently ponded-Rooset, stony complex 2 to 35 percent slopes, landslides708E398124098442lwmxmt61220111:24000
Hairpin loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes, stony60D322514544691kthcmt61220111:24000
Hairpin-Libeg, very stony complex, 4 to 45 percent slopes, landslides12E30292597684w25gmt61220111:24000
Hairpin-Libeg complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes160D3004186059520g36mt61220111:24000
Loberg, very stony-Eastridge, very stony-Hairpin, frequently ponded, stony complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes, landslides707E226324377642mtpkmt61220111:24000
Butchhill, very stony-Hairpin, very stony-Woodhurst complex, 15 to 50 percent slopes351F206324250252mdfmmt61220111:24000
Libeg, stony-Hairpin complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes103D1898190220021vd9mt61220111:24000
Finn-Slagamelt-Hairpin, stony complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes243C1617186065720g56mt61220111:24000
Butchhill, very stony-Hairpin-Libeg, stony complex, 4 to 25 percent slopes, landslides602E59124098742lwnwmt61220111:24000
Libeg, stony-Hairpin-Nieman, very stony complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes3E535185777820c5bmt61220111:24000
Butchhill, very stony-Hairpin-Loberg, extremely stony complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes, landslides451E16124252942mdq9mt61220111:24000
Libeg, stony-Hairpin complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes103D151251874021vd9mt61420121:24000
Finn-Slagamelt-Hairpin, stony complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes243C61252083820g56mt61420121:24000
Hairpin-Harkness-Baird Hollow families, complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes43222554766536jwy6351:24000
Hairpin-Harkness-Baird Hollow families, complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes4327739152040536jwy66320121:24000
Hairpin-Harkness-Baird Hollow families, complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes43226472611988536jwy7231:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the HAIRPIN soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .