Soil Data Explorer - GRISWOLD

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GRISWOLD soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GRISWOLD, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GRISWOLD were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
95B	67IL111004	1967IL111004	Griswold	5	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	42.3751518,-88.307173

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GRISWOLD soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GRISWOLD series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the GRISWOLD series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the GRISWOLD series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GRISWOLD share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the GRISWOLD series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the GRISWOLD series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GRISWOLD, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing GRISWOLD as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Griswold loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	363D2	363	1407190	2szg5	il007	2006	1:12000
Griswold loam, 4 to 6 percent slopes, eroded	363C2	178	1407189	2szg7	il007	2006	1:12000
Griswold loam, 2 to 4 percent slopes	363B	346	2376209	2szg8	il031	2008	1:12000
Griswold loam, 4 to 6 percent slopes, eroded	363C2	185	2376210	2szg7	il031	2008	1:12000
Griswold loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	363D2	1514	937027	10g1p	il103	2004	1:12000
Griswold loam, 4 to 6 percent slopes, eroded	363C2	6109	182685	2szg7	il111	1997	1:12000
Griswold loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	363D2	1179	182688	2szg5	il111	1997	1:12000
Griswold loam, 2 to 4 percent slopes	363B	645	182682	2szg8	il111	1997	1:12000
Griswold loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	363D2	3777	208602	2szg5	il141	2005	1:12000
Griswold loam, 2 to 4 percent slopes	363B	1976	1479167	2szg8	il141	2005	1:12000
Griswold loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	363D2	890	1592019	2szg5	il177	2006	1:12000
Griswold loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	363D2	21629	174059	5v3t	il201	1997	1:12000
Griswold loam, 2 to 4 percent slopes	363B	4981	174057	2szg8	il201	1997	1:12000
Griswold loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	GtA	1577	160868	5dd9	in085	1985	1:20000
Griswold silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded	GrB2	6442	423282	2szfx	wi021	1972	1:15840
Griswold silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	GrC2	4218	423283	2szfy	wi021	1972	1:15840
Griswold silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes, eroded	GrD2	1145	423284	3074m	wi021	1972	1:15840
Griswold loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes	GwC	9452	753516	2szg3	wi025	1972	1:15840
Griswold loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes, eroded	GwD2	2131	753517	2szg6	wi025	1972	1:15840
Griswold loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	GwB	1913	753515	2szg1	wi025	1972	1:15840
Griswold silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, moderately eroded	GrC2	1309	425278	g8jn	wi045	1969	1:12000
Griswold silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately eroded	GrB2	475	425277	g8jm	wi045	1969	1:12000
Griswold silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	GrB	2375	423688	2szfw	wi047	1974	1:20000
Griswold silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	GrC2	1036	423689	2szfy	wi047	1974	1:20000
Griswold silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	GrA	259	423687	3074l	wi047	1974	1:20000
Griswold sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	GwB	626	423789	3074p	wi055	1976	1:15840
Griswold sandy loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	GwC2	332	423790	3074q	wi055	1976	1:15840
Griswold loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	GsC2	296	3268781	2szg5	wi101	2023	1:15840
Griswold loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	GsB	278	3268780	2szg1	wi101	2023	1:15840
Griswold loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded	GrB2	5955	426314	2szg2	wi105	1970	1:20000
Griswold loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	GrC2	5251	426315	2szg5	wi105	1970	1:20000
Griswold loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes, eroded	GrD2	396	426316	2szg6	wi105	1970	1:20000
Griswold loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	GrA	174	426313	3074k	wi105	1970	1:20000
Griswold silt loam, mottled subsoil variant, 0 to 3 percent slopes	GwA	1577	425627	g8wx	wi127	1967	1:15840
Griswold loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	GsC2	903	425625	2szg5	wi127	1967	1:15840
Griswold loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	GsB	866	425624	2szg1	wi127	1967	1:15840
Griswold loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes, eroded	GsD2	292	425626	2szg6	wi127	1967	1:15840
Griswold silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	GtB	533	3403428	2szfw	wi133	2023	1:15840
Griswold silt loam, mottled subsoil variant, 2 to 6 percent slopes	GwB	309	3403426	g93z	wi133	2023	1:15840
Griswold silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	GtC2	173	3403427	2szfy	wi133	2023	1:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GRISWOLD soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).