Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GOLDSTON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GOLDSTON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GOLDSTON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
136VPI0249V1984-VA081-249Goldston2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.5784798,-77.7249756
136VPI0250V1984-VA081-250Goldston1Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.5809326,-77.733284
n/a40A4060S1965NC167003GOLDSTON4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GOLDSTON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GOLDSTON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GOLDSTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GOLDSTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GOLDSTON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GOLDSTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GOLDSTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GOLDSTON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. SC-2012-03-14-32 | Saluda County - August 1962

    Landscape showing association of soils developed in alluvium (Soil Survey of Saluda County, SC; 1962).

  2. SC-2012-03-14-34 | Saluda County - August 1962

    Landscape showing association of soils in the Carolina slate belt (Soil Survey of Saluda County, SC; 1962).

Map Units

Map units containing GOLDSTON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Goldston slaty silt loam, 10 to 25 percent slopesGoE60324883bx23ga24519791:15840
Goldston channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesGoB147321145163v52nc00719991:24000
Goldston channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesGoC82441145173v53nc00719991:24000
Badin-Goldston complex, 2 to 8 percent slopesBgB67811144993v4jnc00719991:24000
Badin-Goldston complex, 15 to 25 percent slopesBgD62931145013v4lnc00719991:24000
Goldston channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesGoD58921145183v54nc00719991:24000
Badin-Goldston complex, 8 to 15 percent slopesBgC43331145003v4knc00719991:24000
Goldston channery silt loam, 25 to 45 percent slopesGoE27111145193v55nc00719991:24000
Goldston very channery silt loam, 4 to 15 percent slopesGoC65051116453r5gnc02519831:24000
Goldston very channery silt loam, 15 to 45 percent slopesGoF19701116463r5hnc02519831:24000
Goldston-Badin complex, 2 to 15 percent slopesGoC366214855741lvvrnc03720051:24000
Goldston-Badin complex, 15 to 35 percent slopesGoE213314855721lvvpnc03720051:24000
Goldston very channery silt loam, 15 to 45 percent slopesGnE18561121653rq7nc05719851:24000
Goldston very channery silt loam, 4 to 15 percent slopesGnD16281121643rq6nc05719851:24000
Goldston very channery silt loam, 10 to 25 percent slopesGlE149624507622n86vnc06319711:15840
Goldston very channery silt loam, 25 to 45 percent slopesGlF43624507632n86wnc06319711:15840
Goldston very channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesGoD1401136703t8snc11919771:24000
Goldston very channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesGoB1171136693t8rnc11919771:24000
Goldston-Badin complex, 15 to 45 percent slopesGoE908622335782dz6xnc12320071:24000
Badin-Goldston complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately erodedBaC2250822335502dz60nc12320071:24000
Badin-Goldston complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately erodedBaB2112222335492dz5znc12320071:24000
Goldston very channery silt loam, 2 to 15 percent slopesGoC87941139073tjfnc12519871:24000
Goldston very channery silt loam, 15 to 45 percent slopesGoF84971139083tjgnc12519871:24000
Goldston channery silt loam, 15 to 45 percent slopesGlF195824507422n866nc13519751:20000
Goldston channery silt loam, 6 to 15 percent slopesGlD79224507412n865nc13519751:20000
Goldston channery silt loam, 15 to 45 percent slopesGoF29271142503twhnc14519871:24000
Goldston channery silt loam, 4 to 15 percent slopesGoC20621142493twgnc14519871:24000
Goldston very channery silt loam, 4 to 15 percent slopesGoC40941174483y6nnc15119981:24000
Goldston very channery silt loam, 15 to 50 percent slopesGoE38361174493y6pnc15119981:24000
Goldston-Badin complex, 15 to 55 percent slopesGdD76141147093vc9nc15319961:24000
Badin-Goldston complex, 8 to 15 percent slopesBgC19211146973vbxnc15319961:24000
Badin-Goldston complex, 2 to 8 percent slopesBgB19141149693vmpnc15919961:24000
Badin-Goldston complex, 8 to 15 percent slopesBgC7831149703vmqnc15919961:24000
Goldston very channery silt loam, 4 to 15 percent slopesGoC353641151653vv0nc16719841:24000
Goldston very channery silt loam, 15 to 45 percent slopesGoF213931151663vv1nc16719841:24000
Goldston-Badin complex, 2 to 8 percent slopesGsB308661153523w11nc17919911:24000
Goldston-Badin complex, 8 to 15 percent slopesGsC133201153533w12nc17919911:24000
Goldston very channery silt loam, 4 to 15 percent slopesGoC102901153503w0znc17919911:24000
Goldston very channery silt loam, 15 to 45 percent slopesGoE48781153513w10nc17919911:24000
Goldston-Badin complex, 15 to 45 percent slopesGsE35381153543w13nc17919911:24000
Goldston slaty silt loam, 10 to 40 percent slopesGoE2921176763yg0nc18119771:20000
Goldston slaty silt loam, 4 to 10 percent slopesGoC1631176753yfznc18119771:20000
Goldston channery silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopesGtC28571320154fcksc02519891:20000
Goldston channery silt loam, 15 to 40 percent slopesGtF16631320174fcmsc02519891:20000
Goldston channery silt loam, 10 to 15 percent slopesGtD14991320164fclsc02519891:20000
Goldston channery silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesGtB3791320144fcjsc02519891:20000
Goldston slaty silt loam, 10 to 15 percent slopesGoD39231298534c3tsc03719781:20000
Goldston slaty silt loam, 15 to 40 percent slopesGoF35651298544c3vsc03719781:20000
Goldston slaty silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopesGoC33191298524c3ssc03719781:20000
Goldston slaty silt loam, 6 to 15 percent slopesGoD5421300514cb6sc04719731:20000
Goldston slaty silt loam, 15 to 40 percent slopesGoF821300524cb7sc04719731:20000
Goldston-Pickens complex, 6 to 10 percent slopesGpC44731302894ckwsc05719671:20000
Goldston-Pickens complex, 2 to 6 percent slopesGpB10351302884ckvsc05719671:20000
Goldston slaty silt loam, 6 to 15 percent slopesGoD58151307034d07sc06519731:20000
Goldston slaty silt loam, 15 to 40 percent slopesGoF37011307044d08sc06519731:20000
Badin-Goldston complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes4C80324207182m7ypva02520071:24000
Goldston-Badin complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes15D48124207412m7zfva02520071:24000
Goldston silt loam, 10 to 15 percent slopesGoD28951187303zk0va03719701:15840
Goldston silt loam, 15 to 35 percent slopesGoF26111187313zk1va03719701:15840
Goldston silt loam, 4 to 10 percent slopesGoC16521187293zjzva03719701:15840
Fluvanna-Goldston complex, 7 to 15 percent slopes, severely eroded16C31083695350rbknva08119861:15840
Fluvanna-Goldston complex, 2 to 7 percent slopes, severely eroded16B3421695349rbkmva08119861:15840
Montonia-Goldston complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes33C774814728321lflqva08320041:24000
Goldston-Montonia complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes23D646314728171lfl7va08320041:24000
Goldston-Montonia complex, 25 to 45 percent slopes23E217914728181lfl8va08320041:24000
Goldston channery loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes9D235611947840b4va11119791:20000
Goldston channery silt loam, 6 to 20 percent slopesGoC2717011957040f3va11719901:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GOLDSTON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .