Aggregate lab data for the GILPIN soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GILPIN, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GILPIN were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE
Pedons used in the lab summary:
Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GILPIN soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.
Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GILPIN series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2025-02-20) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2025-02-20).
Select annual climate data summaries for the GILPIN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).
Geomorphic description summaries for the GILPIN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).
Soil series competing with GILPIN share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2025-02-20) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2025-02-20).
Select annual climate data summaries for the GILPIN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).
Geomorphic description summaries for the GILPIN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).
Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GILPIN, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2025-02-20).
Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.
Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Berks-Gilpin-Wellston association (Soil Survey of Jackson County, Indiana; 1990).
Pattern of soils, topography, and underlying material in the Wellston-Gilpin-Zanesville map unit (Soil Survey of Orange County, Indiana; 1984).
Relationship of relief and geologic strata to certain of the soil series represented in Perry County. The vertical scale is greatly exaggerated (Soil Survey of Perry County, Indiana; 1969).
Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Shelocta-Cloverlick-Highsplint general soil map unit. This unit covers about 80 percent of the county. Most areas are hilly and forested (Soil Survey of Clay County, Kentucky; 2003).
Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Shelocta-Fairpoint-Bethesda-Gilpin general soil map unit. This map unit is primarily in the west-central part of the county. It has been extensively mined for coal (Soil Survey of Clay County, Kentucky; 2003)
Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Highsplint-Cloverlick-Kimper general soil map unit in Knott County (Soil Survey of Knott and Letcher Counties, Kentucky; 2004).
Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Handshoe-Cloverlick-Fedscreek-Marrowbone general soil map unit in Knott County (Soil Survey of Knott and Letcher Counties, Kentucky; 2004).
Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Kimper-Cloverlick-Renox-Highsplint general soil map unit in Letcher County (Soil Survey of Knott and Letcher Counties, Kentucky; 2004).
Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Alticrest-Varilla-Shelocta-Jefferson general soil map unit and the Cloverlick-Highsplint-Guyandotte-Shelocta general soil map unit in Letcher County (Soil Survey of Knott and Letcher Counties, Kentucky; 2004).
Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Cloverlick-Fedscreek-Dekalb general soil map unit in Letcher County (Soil Survey of Knott and Letcher Counties, Kentucky; 2004).
Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Cloverlick-Fedscreek-Kimper general soil map unit in Knott County (Soil Survey of Knott and Letcher Counties, Kentucky; 2004).
Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Berks-Brownsville-Shelocta general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Lewis County, Kentucky; 2004).
Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Bledsoe-Gilpin general soil map unit in Estill County (Soil Survey of Estill and Lee Counties, Kentucky; 2007).
Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Helechawa-Alticrest-Gilpin-Rock outcrop general soil map unit in Lee County (Soil Survey of Estill and Lee Counties, Kentucky; 2007).
Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Gilpin-Latham general soil map unit in Lee County (Soil Survey of Estill and Lee Counties, Kentucky; 2007).
Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Gilpin general soil map unit in Lee County (Soil Survey of Estill and Lee Counties, Kentucky; 2007).
Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Helechawa-Gilpin-Hazleton general soil map unit in Morgan County (Soil Survey of Magoffin and Morgan Counties, Kentucky; 2002).
Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Pope-Helechawa-Gilpin general soil map unit in Magoffin County (Soil Survey of Magoffin and Morgan Counties, Kentucky; 2002).
Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Kimper-Shelocta-Fedscreek-Gilpin general soil map unit in Magoffin County (Soil Survey of Magoffin and Morgan Counties, Kentucky; 2002).
Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Gilpin-Latham-Marrowbone general soil map unit in Morgan County (Soil Survey of Magoffin and Morgan Counties, Kentucky; 2002).
Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Gilpin-Shelocta-Latham general soil map unit in Morgan County (Soil Survey of Magoffin and Morgan Counties, Kentucky; 2002).
Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Rigley-Shelocta-Gilpin-Rock outcrop general soil map unit in Morgan County (Soil Survey of Magoffin and Morgan Counties, Kentucky; 2002).
Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Rigley-Bledsoe-Alticrest-Berks general soil map unit in Morgan County (Soil Survey of Magoffin and Morgan Counties, Kentucky; 2002).
Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Gilpin-Allegheny-Grigsby general soil map unit in Morgan County (Soil Survey of Magoffin and Morgan Counties, Kentucky; 2002).
Relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Gilpin-Clarkrange-Rosine association (Soil Survey of Butler and Edmonson Counties, Kentucky).
Relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Newark-Nolin-Melvin association (Soil Survey of Butler and Edmonson Counties, Kentucky).
Relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Shelocta-Latham-Gilpin association (Soil Survey of Butler and Edmonson Counties, Kentucky).
Relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Allegheny-Sciotoville association (Soil Survey of Butler and Edmonson Counties, Kentucky).
Relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Bethesda-Fairpoint association (Soil Survey of Butler and Edmonson Counties, Kentucky).
Relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Gilpin-Clarkrange-Rosine association (Soil Survey of Butler and Edmonson Counties, Kentucky).
Relationship of soils to topography and geology in the Fedscreek-Hazleton-Shelocta-Gilpin general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Floyd and Johnson Counties, Kentucky; 2000).
Typical relationship of soils to topography and the underlying material in the Sadler-Zanesville general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Breckinridge and Meade Counties, Kentucky; 2001).
Typical relationship of soils to topography and the underlying material in the Rosine-Gilpin-Zanesville general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Breckinridge and Meade Counties, Kentucky; 2001).
Typical pattern of soils and underlying materials in association 3 (Soil Survey of Caldwell County, Kentucky; September 1966).
Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Latham-Shelocta-Gilpin association (Soil Survey of Estill and Lee Counties, Kentucky; August 1974).
Relationship of soils to topography and geology in the Hazleton-Fedscreek-Dekalb-Marrowbone general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Floyd and Johnson Counties, Kentucky; 2000).
Relationship of soils to topography and geology in the Hazleton-Sharondale-Dekalb-Marrowbone general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Floyd and Johnson Counties, Kentucky; 2000).
Relationship of soils to topography and geology in the Fedscreek-Hazleton-Shelocta-Gilpin general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Floyd and Johnson Counties, Kentucky; 2000).
Relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Zanesville-Gilpin-Wellston-Weikert association (Soil Survey of Grayson County, Kentucky; December 1972).
Parent material, position, and pattern of soils in the Loring-Zanesville-Wellston association (Soil Survey of Henderson County, Kentucky; February 1967).
Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Shelocta-Gilpin map unit (Soil Survey of Jackson and Owsley Counties, Kentucky; April 1989).
Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Shelocta-Gilpin-Cutshin map unit (Soil Survey of Jackson and Owsley Counties, Kentucky; April 1989).
Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Shelocta-Bledsoe-Gilpin map unit (Soil Survey of Jackson and Owsley Counties, Kentucky; April 1989).
Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Gilpin-Shelocta-Rayne map unit (Soil Survey of Jackson and Owsley Counties, Kentucky; April 1989).
General location of the Muse and Shelocta soils in a typical area of the Jellico Mountains. Small areas of sandstone cliffs are common (Soil Survey of McCreary-Whitley Area, Kentucky; 1970).
Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Latham-Shelocta association (Soil Survey of Menifee and Rowan Counties and Northwestern Morgan County, Kentucky; December 1974).
Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Latham-Tilsit-Johnsburg association (Soil Survey of Menifee and Rowan Counties and Northwestern Morgan County, Kentucky; December 1974).
Along the Levisa and Russell Forks of the Big Sandy River, the soils in the valleys are in the Nelse-Shelbiana-Udorthents general soil map unit and those on the mountains are in the Marrowbone-Fedscreek-Kimper-Dekalb map unit (Soil Survey of Pike County, Kentucky; June 1990).
Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Helechawa-Alticrest-Gilpin-Rock outcrop general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Powell and Wolfe Counties, Kentucky; September 1993).
Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Sheloctal-Gilpin-Latham general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Powell and Wolfe Counties, Kentucky; September 1993).
Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Gilpin-Rosine-Shelocta general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Mammoth Cave National Park, Kentucky; 2010).
Typical relationship of soils to parent material in the Allegheny River Valley (Soil Survey of Seneca Nation of Indians, New York; August 1984).
Representative pattern of soils and parent materials in the Teegarden-Kensington soils association (Soil Survey of Columbiana County, Ohio).
Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Bethesda-Coshocton-Westmoreland association (Soil Survey of Coshocton County, Ohio; 2001).
Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Shelocta-Berks-Gilpin association (Soil Survey of Fairfield County, Ohio; 2005).
Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Shelocta-Brownsville-Germano general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Vinton County, Ohio; 2004).
Relationships of soils in associations 1 and 6 to topography and underlying materials along the Ohio River (Soil Survey of Monroe County, Ohio; March 1974).
Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Latham-Wharton-Shelocta association (Soil Survey of Scioto County, Ohio; January 1989).
Relationship of soils to geology and physiography in soil association 5 (Soil Survey of Allegheny County, PA; 1981).
The pattern of soils and underlying material in the Gilpin--Wharton-Upshur soil association (Soil Survey of Allegheny County, PA; 1981).
Pattern of soils and parent material in Gilpin-Wharton-Weikert association (Soil Survey of Beaver and Lawrence Counties, PA; 1982).
Pattern of soils and parent material in Gilpin-Upshur-Weikert association (Soil Survey of Beaver and Lawrence Counties, PA; 1982).
Pattern of soils and parent material in Gilpin-Guernsey-Culleoka association (Soil Survey of Beaver and Lawrence Counties, PA; 1982).
Pattern of soils and parent material in Gilpin-Weikert association (Soil Survey of Beaver and Lawrence Counties, PA; 1982).
Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Cookport-Hazleton-Laidig association (Soil Survey of Cambria County, PA; 1985).
Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Gilpin-Ernest-Wharton association (Soil Survey of Cambria County, PA; 1985).
Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Brinkerton-Wharton-Cavode association (Soil Survey of Cambria County, PA; 1985).
Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in association 2 (Soil Survey of Centre County, PA; 1981).
Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Rayne-Gilpin-Ernest association (Soil Survey of Clearfield County, PA; 1988).
Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Udorthents-Gilpin-Rayne association (Soil Survey of Clearfield County, PA; 1988).
Parent material, position, and pattern of soils in the Gilpin-Wharton-Ernest soil association (Soil Survey of Fayette County, PA; 1973).
Parent material, position, and pattern of soils in the Guernsey-Westmoreland-Clarksburg soil association (Soil Survey of Fayette County, PA; 1973).
Parent material, position, and pattern of soils in the Monongahela-Philo-Atkins soil association (Soil Survey of Fayette County, PA; 1973).
Parent material, position, and pattern of soils in the Gilpin-Wharton-Cavode association (Soil Survey of Indiana County, PA; 1968).
Parent material, position, and pattern of soils in the Gilpin-Wharton-Upshur association (Soil Survey of Indiana County, PA; 1968).
Parent material, position, and pattern of soils in the Monongahela-Allegheny-Pope-Philo association (Soil Survey of Indiana County, PA; 1968).
Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in area of Rayne-Gilpin-Wharton-Cavode soils (Soil Survey of Somerset County, PA; 1983).
Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in area of Hazleton-Cookport soils (Soil Survey of Somerset County, PA; 1983).
Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in area of Leck Kill-Albrights soils (Soil Survey of Somerset County, PA; 1983).
Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in area of Ernest-Rayne-Gilpin soils (Soil Survey of Somerset County, PA; 1983).
Pattern of soils and underlying material in Cookport-Hazleton-Gilpin association (Soil Survey of Venango County, PA; 1975).
Pattern of soils and underlying material in Cavode-Wharton association (Soil Survey of Venango County, PA; 1975).
Typical landscape and underlying material of the Hazleton-Cookport-Cavode map unit (Soil Survey of Warren and Forest Counties, PA; 1985).
The relationship of soils and landscapes in the Lily-Gilpin and Gilpin-Shelocta-Bouldin general soil map units (Soil Survey of Overton County, Tennessee; 2005).
The relationship of soils, geology, and parent materials in the Lily-Gilpin-Ramsey and Gilpin-Allen-Bouldin-Petros general soil map units (Soil Survey of Rhea County, Tennessee; 2005).
Typical pattern of soils and the underlying material in the Beersheba-Lonewood-Lily general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Grundy County, TN; 2001).
Typical pattern of soils and the underlying material in the Lily-Jefferson-Gilpin general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Grundy County, TN; 2001).
Diagram of a sequence of residual, colluvial, and alluvial soils. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position (Soil Survey of Buchanan County, Virginia).
Illustration of an area that has been surface mined for coal, showing a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and multiple exposed highwalls. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Buchanan County, Virginia).
An idealized cross-section of the north-central section of the survey area showing the relationship among landforms, geology, and soils. Geology adapted from "Geology of the Virginia Portion of the Clintwood and Jenkings East Quadrangles" (Diffenbach, 1988) (Soil Survey of Dickenson County, Virginia; 2009).
Diagram of a sequence of residual, colluvial, and alluvial soils. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position (Soil Survey of Dickenson County, Virginia; 2009).
Illustration of an area that has been surface mined for coal, showing a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and multiple exposed highwalls. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Dickenson County, Virginia; 2009).
Illustration of an area that has been surface mined for coal, showing a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and a single exposed highwall. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Dickenson County, Virginia; 2009).
Typical pattern of soils in the Appalachian Plateau portion of Lee County. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to parent material and landform position (Soil Survey of Lee County, Virginia; 2006).
Diagram of a sequence of landform positions in the Appalachian Plateau area of Russell County. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position (Soil Survey of Russell County, Virginia; 2007).
Diagram of a sequence of landform positions in the Appalachian Plateau area of Scott County. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position (Soil Survey of Scott County, Virginia; 2006).
Diagram of a sequence of residual, colluvial, and alluvial soils. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position (Soil Survey of Buchanan County, Virginia; 2009).
An illustration of an area that has been surface-mined for coal that shows a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and multiple exposed highwalls. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Buchanan County, Virginia; 2009).
An illustration of an area that has been surface-mined for coal that shows a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and a single exposed highwall. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Buchanan County, Virginia; 2009).
Diagram of a sequence of residual, colluvial, and alluvial soils. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position (Soil Survey of Dickenson County, Virginia; 2009).
Illustration of an area that has been surface mined for coal, showing a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and multiple exposed highwalls. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Dickenson County, Virginia; 2009).
Illustration of an area that has been surface mined for coal, showing a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and a single exposed highwall. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Dickenson County, Virginia; 2009).
An idealized cross-section of the north-central section of the survey area showing the relationship among landforms, geology, and soils. Geology adapted from “Geology of the Virginia Portion of the Clintwood and Jenkins East Quadrangles” (Diffenbach, 1988) (Soil Survey of Dickenson County, Virginia; 2009).
Typical pattern of soils in the Appalachian Plateau portion of Lee County. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to parent material and landform position (Soil Survey of Lee County, Virginia; 2006).
Diagram of a sequence of landform positions in the Appalachian Plateau area of Russell County. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position (Soil Survey of Russell County, Virginia; 2007).
The typical pattern of soils and parent material in the southern part of the county (Soil Survey of Clay County, West Virginia; 2005).
The typical pattern of soils and parent material in the northern part of the county (Soil Survey of Clay County, West Virginia; 2005).
Chagrin soil along Middle Island Creek. Also shown is the typical pattern of other soils and their underlying parent material in parts of Doddridge County (Soil Survey of Doddridge County, West Virginia; 2005).
The typical pattern of Gilpin, Peabody, and other soils and their underlying parent material. This pattern of soils is dominant in the county (Soil Survey of Doddridge County, West Virginia; 2005).
The typical pattern of upland soils and parent materials that are dominant throughout the survey area (Soil Survey of Jackson and Mason Counties, West Virginia).
The dominant upland and high terrace soils in the Upper Flats area of northern Mason County. These high terrace soils have their origins associated with the ancient Teays River system (Soil Survey of Jackson and Mason Counties, West Virginia).
Typical pattern of soils and parent material in an area of the Rayne-Gilpin-Matewan general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Lincoln County, West Virginia; 2007).
Typical pattern of soils and parent material in an area of the Gilpin-Upshur general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Lincoln County, West Virginia; 2007).
Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Berks-Shelocta general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Boone County, WV; 1994).
Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Kaymine-Cedarcreek-Dekalb general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Boone County, WV; 1994).
Typical relationship of soils, landscapes, and underlying parent materials in Otwell-Gallia-Hackers general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Pleasants and Tyler Counties, WV; 1989).
Pattern of soils and parent material in the Gilpin-Peabody general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Wetzel County, WV; 1995).
Map units containing GILPIN as a major component. Limited to 250 records.
Approximate geographic distribution of the GILPIN soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).