Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GETTYS soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GETTYS, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GETTYS were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GETTYS soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GETTYS series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GETTYS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GETTYS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GETTYS share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GETTYS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GETTYS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GETTYS, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. SD-2012-03-15-52 | Hyde County - 1998

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Sansarc-Opal association (Soil Survey of Hyde County, SD; 1998).

  2. SD-2012-03-15-57 | Jerauld County - September 1994

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Homme-Peno association (Soil Survey of Jerauld County, SD; 1994).

  3. SD-2012-03-15-87 | Potter County - October 1985

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Betts-Gettys association (Soil Survey of Potter County, SD; 1985).

Map Units

Map units containing GETTYS as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Gettys-Peno complex, steepZrE7186352709cv0qsd05919591:20000
Gettys-Peno complex, steepZmE2732352707cv0nsd05919591:20000
Gettys clay loam, 15 to 40 percent slopesGeE12485353282cvm6sd06519701:20000
Peno-Gettys clay loams, 9 to 15 percent slopesPeD106663533162wkqfsd06519701:20000
Lakoma-gettys-rock outcrop complex, 15 to 40 percent slopesRo4077353328cvnpsd06519701:20000
Sansarc-Gettys complex, 9 to 34 percent slopesSaE2722353329cvnqsd06519701:20000
Peno-Gettys clay loams, 9 to 15 percent slopesPgD50003538342wkqfsd06919921:20000
Gettys-Sansarc complex, 9 to 40 percent slopesGfF2961353796cw4ssd06919921:20000
Peno-Gettys complex, 6 to 9 percent slopesPgC5588356453cyxhsd07319871:20000
Peno-Gettys clay loams, 9 to 15 percent slopesGpD32963564342wkqfsd07319871:20000
Raber-Gettys complex, 9 to 25 percent slopesRgD6655355366cxsfsd10719831:20000
Betts-Gettys complex, stony, 15 to 60 percent slopesBgE3982355313cxqqsd10719831:20000
Gettys clay loam, 25 to 40 percent slopesGeF3368355326cxr4sd10719831:20000
Betts-Gettys complex, stonyRu7849353127cvg6sd11919671:20000
Gettys clay loam, 6 to 25 percent slopesGeE4703353076cvdksd11919671:20000
Bearpaw-Gettys complex, cool, 6 to 15 percent slopesC195D694928001192rrq1sd12919751:20000
Gettys clay loam, cool, 9 to 40 percent slopesC196E571528001202rrq2sd12919751:20000
Gettys clay loam, 9 to 40 percent slopesGeE1865354489cww4sd12919751:20000
Raber-Gettys complex, 6 to 15 percent slopesRbD792354523cwx7sd12919751:20000
Gettys clay loam, 25 to 40 percent slopesGeF3657355502cxxtsd60319831:20000
Peno-Gettys clay loams, 9 to 15 percent slopesGeE11843555012wkqfsd60319831:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GETTYS soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .