Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the COYLE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of COYLE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to COYLE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
80A91P087291OK083001Coyle6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties35.9027786,-97.4022217
84A90P0947S1990OK103002Coyle7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.1627769,-97.2488861

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the COYLE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the COYLE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the COYLE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the COYLE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with COYLE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the COYLE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the COYLE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with COYLE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. OK-2010-09-29-02 | Logan County - 2006

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Ashport-Pulaski-Lawrie general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Logan County, Oklahoma; 2006).

  2. OK-2010-09-29-03 | Logan County - 2006

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Grainola-Renfrow-Piedmont general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Logan County, Oklahoma; 2006).

  3. OK-2010-09-29-06 | Logan County - 2006

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Coyle-Ironmound-Zaneis general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Logan County, Oklahoma; 2006).

  4. OK-2010-09-29-07 | Noble County - 2005

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Grainola-Lucien-Masham general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Noble County, Oklahoma; 2005).

  5. OK-2010-09-29-15 | Oklahoma County - 2004

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Renfrow-Grainola-Piedmont general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma; 2004).

  6. OK-2012-02-17-26 | Payne County - April 1987

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Agra-Coyle and Steedman-Lucien-Grainola map units (Soil Survey of Payne County, Oklahoma; April 1987).

  7. OK-2012-02-17-27 | Payne County - April 1987

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Renfrow-Coyle-Grainola map unit (Soil Survey of Payne County, Oklahoma; April 1987).

Map Units

Map units containing COYLE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Coyle fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesBa9166382264dts3ok03719521:24000
Coyle fine sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesBb6466382265dts4ok03719521:24000
Coyle fine sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, severely erodedBc1887382266dts5ok03719521:24000
Coyle loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesCoyB3325152872td5yok03719521:24000
Coyle and Seminole soils, 3 to 5 percent slopes, severely erodedCbC349449383505dw24ok08119661:24000
Coyle loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, erodedCaC2133223835042tp6nok08119661:24000
Coyle loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesCaC54463835032tp6mok08119661:24000
Coyle-Ironmound complex, 3 to 5 percent slopes, erodedCoIC2278513835992wrk6ok08319941:12000
Ironmound-Coyle complex, 5 to 15 percent slopesIrCE193063836312tq5pok08319941:12000
Coyle loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, erodedCoyC293143836032tp6nok08319941:12000
Coyle-Ashport frequently flooded-Ironmound complex, 1 to 8 percent slopesCAID6262383597dw53ok08319941:12000
Coyle and Zaneis soils, 3 to 5 percent slopes, severely erodedCoZC341853836012wrk5ok08319941:12000
Ironmound-Coyle-Grainola complex, 5 to 8 percent slopes, severely erodedICGD33456383630dw65ok08319941:12000
Coyle loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesCoyB26853836022td5yok08319941:12000
Coyle-Urban land complex, 1 to 5 percent slopesCoUC1526383600dw56ok08319941:12000
Coyle-Urban land complex, 1 to 3 percent slopesCoUB415874761q8wxok08319941:12000
Coyle-Lucien complex, 1 to 5 percent slopesCoLC5717384040dwmdok10319941:24000
Coyle and Zaneis soils, 3 to 5 percent slopes, severely erodedCoZC326823840412wrk5ok10319941:24000
Coyle loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, erodedCoyC213373840442tp6nok10319941:24000
Coyle loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesCoyC6523840432tp6mok10319941:24000
Coyle loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesCoyB5523840422td5yok10319941:24000
Ironmound-Coyle complex, 5 to 15 percent slopesIrCE11863843072tq5pok10919961:12000
Coyle-Urban land complex, 1 to 3 percent slopesCoUB620384278dww2ok10919961:12000
Coyle-Ironmound complex, 3 to 5 percent slopes, erodedCoIC26043842772wrk6ok10919961:12000
Coyle loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesCoyB4993842792td5yok10919961:12000
Lucien-Coyle complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes1375423623408nxpyok11319751:24000
Coyle loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes4157866233992td5yok11319751:24000
Coyle-Lucien complex, 3 to 12 percent slopes609796623455nxrgok11319751:24000
Coyle loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes59186234002tp6mok11319751:24000
Coyle-Lucien complex, 1 to 5 percent slopesCoLC1324514231501jrx2ok11720071:24000
Coyle-Lucien complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes, eroded, very rockyCoLC2291716770241t92kok11720071:24000
Coyle loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesCoyB206014231512td5yok11720071:24000
Coyle loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesCoyC77814231522tp6mok11720071:24000
Coyle and Zaneis soils, 3 to 5 percent slopes, severely erodedCoZC322516770212wrk5ok11720071:24000
Coyle loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, eroded479303845372tp6nok11919831:24000
Coyle and Zaneis soils, 3 to 5 percent slopes, severely eroded7673233845772wrk5ok11919831:24000
Coyle loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes362173845262tp6mok11919831:24000
Coyle-Lucien complex, 1 to 5 percent slopesCoLC4989190765022123ok11919831:24000
Coyle loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesCoyB32453845152td5yok11919831:24000
Coyle-Lucien complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes, eroded, rockyCoLC276190051621smzok11919831:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the COYLE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .