Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CORLISS soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CORLISS, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CORLISS were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
88UMN2508S1977MN0292508Corliss2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties47.8650017,-95.3083878
91AUMN1149S1970MN111001Corliss3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.7169342,-96.1205902
91AUMN1152S1970MN111002Corliss2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.6986122,-96.1306076
91AUMN4371S1990MN111003Corliss3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.619139,-95.602369

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CORLISS soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CORLISS series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CORLISS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CORLISS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CORLISS share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CORLISS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CORLISS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CORLISS, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. MN-2010-09-08-21 | Otter Tail County - 2001

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Arvilla-Sverdrup-Sandberg association (Soil Survey of Otter Tail County, Minnesota; 2001).

  2. MN-2010-09-08-24 | Otter Tail County - 2001

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Dorset-Corliss-Nidaros association (Soil Survey of Otter Tail County, Minnesota; 2001).

  3. MN-2010-09-10-08 | Roseau County -

    Relationship of soils, underlying materials, and landforms in the Karstad-Markey-Corliss association (Soil Survey of Roseau County, Minnesota).

Map Units

Map units containing CORLISS as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Dorset-Corliss complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes778B72063975652w0m5mn00519941:20000
Dorset-Corliss complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes778C50223975662w0m6mn00519941:20000
Corliss-Dorset complex, 6 to 20 percent slopes1247D11233974612w0m7mn00519941:20000
Corliss loamy sand, 20 to 35 percent slopes721E721397553fbp9mn00519941:20000
Eagleview-Nymore-Corliss complex, Mississippi River Valley, 15 to 60 percent slopesD99G45527326862slnbmn03520091:24000
Dorset-Corliss complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes778B82514367222w0m5mn05719981:24000
Dorset-Corliss complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes778C22764367232w0m6mn05719981:24000
Corliss-Dorset complex, 6 to 20 percent slopes1247D2244365182w0m7mn05719981:24000
Corliss loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopesI727B265927990122qktnmn08919941:20000
Dorset-Corliss complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes778B431784359462w0m5mn11119961:20000
Dorset-Corliss complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes778C183054359472w0m6mn11119961:20000
Corliss loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes721B8111435923gmm1mn11119961:20000
Corliss-Dorset complex, 6 to 20 percent slopes1247D47844355812w0m7mn11119961:20000
Corliss loamy sand, 12 to 20 percent slopes721D3758435925gmm3mn11119961:20000
Corliss loamy sand, 6 to 12 percent slopes721C3293435924gmm2mn11119961:20000
Chapett-Corliss complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes, eroded1112D3051435535gm6jmn11119961:20000
Corliss loamy sand, 20 to 35 percent slopes721E1869435926gmm4mn11119961:20000
Chapett-Corliss complex, 20 to 30 percent slopes1112E1300435536gm6kmn11119961:20000
Corliss-Sverdrup complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes1277D959435593gm8dmn11119961:20000
Corliss loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopesI727B354227998842qktnmn13519991:24000
Corliss loamy coarse sand, 2 to 6 percent slopesI572B438926430322ptxqnd06719721:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CORLISS soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .