Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the BIGBEAR soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of BIGBEAR, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to BIGBEAR were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the BIGBEAR soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the BIGBEAR series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BIGBEAR series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BIGBEAR series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with BIGBEAR share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BIGBEAR series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BIGBEAR series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with BIGBEAR, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing BIGBEAR as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Bigbear loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes65D295015564156ypmt62219971:24000
Bigbear loam, 4 to 8 percent slopes65C253415564056ynmt62219971:24000
Bigbear-Storyhill-Adel complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes665E142815564756ywmt62219971:24000
Bigbear clay loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes65E74115564256yqmt62219971:24000
Storyhill-Bigbear complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes665D43715564656yvmt62219971:24000
Storyhill, very stony-Bigbear, stony-Adel complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes365E42715543156qxmt62219971:24000
Bigbear, stony-Storyhill, very stony complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes365D42215543056qwmt62219971:24000
Bigbear loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes65B32115563956ymmt62219971:24000
Bigbear loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes1741371465344xgxmt63619831:24000
Bigbear-Roy loams, 2 to 8 percent slopes150C16681156844586hmt6691:24000
Bacbuster-Bigbear-Vershal, very channery complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes5402D6259156720582hmt6691:24000
Pachel-Bigbear-Fairway complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes5404E381915646957tdmt6691:24000
Bigbear-Roy cobbly clay loams, 2 to 8 percent slopes250C24911569005889mt6691:24000
Bigbear-Bacbuster-Vershal complex, 4 to 45 percent slopes5604E21931566465803mt6691:24000
Shawmut, very stony-Bowery-Bigbear, very stony complex, 4 to 45 percent slopes3541E1539655067pzn6mt6691:24000
Bigbear-Roy loams, 8 to 15 percent slopes150D1353156845586jmt6691:24000
Roy-Bigbear clay loams, 0 to 4 percent slopes152B897156847586lmt6691:24000
Bigbear-Roy cobbly clay loams, 8 to 15 percent slopes250D545156901588bmt6691:24000
Bigbear-Roy, extremely stony complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes3413D332696032rc8nmt6691:24000
Snakejohn-Bigbear, extremely stony-Detra families, complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes858666815238wcb0ut6511:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the BIGBEAR soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .