Soil Data Explorer - AMANDA

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the AMANDA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of AMANDA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to AMANDA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
n/a	LC-032	1981-OH089-032	Amanda	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a
n/a	PR-016	1983-OH127-016	Amanda	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a
n/a	FA-031	1990-OH045-031	Amanda	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the AMANDA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the AMANDA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the AMANDA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the AMANDA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

Competing Series

Soil series competing with AMANDA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the AMANDA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the AMANDA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with AMANDA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. OH-2010-09-29-10 | Columbiana County -

   Representative pattern of soils and parent materials in the Canfield-Ravenna soils association (Soil Survey of Columbiana County, Ohio).

2. OH-2010-09-29-18 | Fairfield County - 2005

   Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Bennington-Cardington-Pewamo association (Soil Survey of Fairfield County, Ohio; 2005).

Map Units

Map units containing AMANDA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Amanda loam, 18 to 25 percent slopes	AmE	52	1592626	1qg81	oh005	1976	1:15840
Chili-Amanda complex, 18 to 25 percent slopes	CuE	14	1592633	1qg88	oh005	1976	1:15840
Amanda loam, 35 to 70 percent slopes	AmF	661	298734	b0vl	oh029	2005	1:12000
Amanda silt loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded	AmD2	1567	172035	5s0j	oh041	1997	1:12000
Amanda silt loam, 18 to 25 percent slopes	AmE	838	172036	5s0k	oh041	1997	1:12000
Amanda silt loam, 25 to 50 percent slopes	AmF	686	172037	5s0l	oh041	1997	1:12000
Amanda-Dekalb-Rock outcrop association, 40 to 70 percent slopes	AnG	788	172105	5s2s	oh043	1998	1:12000
Amanda loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded	AmD2	174	172104	5s2r	oh043	1998	1:12000
Amanda silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	AmC2	21834	172213	5s68	oh045	1998	1:12000
Amanda silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded	AmB2	11944	172212	5s67	oh045	1998	1:12000
Amanda silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	AmB	6770	172211	5s66	oh045	1998	1:12000
Amanda silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes, eroded	AmD2	5951	172214	5s69	oh045	1998	1:12000
Amanda silty clay loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, severely eroded	AoC3	3668	172216	5s6c	oh045	1998	1:12000
Amanda-Loudonville complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes, eroded	ApD2	2427	172220	5s6h	oh045	1998	1:12000
Amanda silt loam, 20 to 35 percent slopes, eroded	AmE2	2357	172215	5s6b	oh045	1998	1:12000
Amanda silty clay loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes, severely eroded	AoD3	2045	172217	5s6d	oh045	1998	1:12000
Amanda-Loudonville complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	ApC2	1478	172219	5s6g	oh045	1998	1:12000
Amanda-Ockley complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	ArC2	1221	172221	5s6j	oh045	1998	1:12000
Urban land-Amanda complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes	UoC	911	172319	5s9p	oh045	1998	1:12000
Amanda-Ockley complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes, eroded	ArD2	327	172222	5s6k	oh045	1998	1:12000
Amanda-Loudonville complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded	ApB2	265	172218	5s6f	oh045	1998	1:12000
Amanda silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes, eroded	AmD2	2	1398192	1hxxz	oh073	1986	1:15840
Amanda silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	AmC2	2	1398277	1hy0q	oh073	1986	1:15840
Amanda silty clay loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, severely eroded	AoC3	1	1398193	1hxy0	oh073	1986	1:15840
Amanda loam, 18 to 25 percent slopes	AmE	4555	286861	9mhl	oh075	1989	1:15840
Chili-Amanda complex, 18 to 25 percent slopes	CoE	1310	286889	9mjh	oh075	1989	1:15840
Amanda-Wooster complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	AwC2	1240	286863	9mhn	oh075	1989	1:15840
Amanda-Wooster complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes	AwB	570	286862	9mhm	oh075	1989	1:15840
Amanda-Wooster complex, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded	AwD2	530	286864	9mhp	oh075	1989	1:15840
Amanda-Dekalb-Rock outcrop association, 40 to 70 percent slopes	AgG	15	1605967	1qx4d	oh077	1988	1:15840
Amanda loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded	AfD2	1	1605966	1qx4c	oh077	1988	1:15840
Amanda silt loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded	AdD2	5479	613548	nlfw	oh083	1983	1:15840
Amanda silt loam, 18 to 40 percent slopes, eroded	AdF2	1632	613549	nlfx	oh083	1983	1:15840
Amanda silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	AmC2	12450	170988	5qxr	oh089	1986	1:15840
Amanda silt loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded	AmD2	9945	170989	5qxs	oh089	1986	1:15840
Amanda silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded	AmB2	3565	170987	5qxq	oh089	1986	1:15840
Amanda silt loam, 25 to 50 percent slopes	AmF	2965	170991	5qxv	oh089	1986	1:15840
Amanda silt loam, 18 to 25 percent slopes	AmE	2415	170990	5qxt	oh089	1986	1:15840
Amanda variant silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	AvC2	1455	170992	5qxw	oh089	1986	1:15840
Amanda variant silt loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded	AvD2	525	170993	5qxx	oh089	1986	1:15840
Amanda loam, 35 to 70 percent slopes	AmF	34	1652178	1sg72	oh099	1966	1:15840
Amanda silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	AdC2	10153	170334	5q7n	oh117	1986	1:15840
Amanda silt loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded	AdD2	5074	170335	5q7p	oh117	1986	1:15840
Amanda silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	AdB	1697	170333	5q7m	oh117	1986	1:15840
Amanda silt loam, 18 to 25 percent slopes, eroded	AdE2	1246	170336	5q7q	oh117	1986	1:15840
Amanda silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	AmC2	4148	537491	l19f	oh127	1984	1:15840
Amanda silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded	AmB2	1105	537490	l19d	oh127	1984	1:15840
Amanda silt loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded	AmD2	614	537492	l19g	oh127	1984	1:15840
Amanda silty clay loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, severely eroded	AoC3	14	562514	lwbm	oh127	1984	1:15840
Amanda silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	AmC2	95	1403065	1j305	oh129	1977	1:15840
Amanda silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded	AmB2	45	1403241	1j35v	oh129	1977	1:15840
Amanda silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes, eroded	AmD2	17	1403066	1j306	oh129	1977	1:15840
Amanda silt loam, 20 to 35 percent slopes, eroded	AmE2	10	1403067	1j307	oh129	1977	1:15840
Amanda silty clay loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes, severely eroded	AoD3	4	1403068	1j308	oh129	1977	1:15840
Amanda-Wooster silt loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded	AwD2	2	1595453	1qk67	oh151	1967	1:15840
Amanda-Wooster silt loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	AwC2	530	2216959	2ddxt	oh169	1981	1:15840
Amanda-Wooster silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes	AwB	379	2216958	2ddxs	oh169	1981	1:15840
Amanda-Wooster silt loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded	AwD2	142	2216960	2ddxv	oh169	1981	1:15840
Amanda loam, 18 to 25 percent slopes	AmE	39	2216957	2ddxr	oh169	1981	1:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the AMANDA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).