Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the YUMTHESKA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of YUMTHESKA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to YUMTHESKA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the YUMTHESKA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the YUMTHESKA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the YUMTHESKA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the YUMTHESKA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with YUMTHESKA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the YUMTHESKA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the YUMTHESKA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with YUMTHESKA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. AZ-2011-05-27-21 | Hualapai-Havasupai Area - 1999

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Deama-Toqui and Natank-Disterheff-Yumtheska general soil map units. The landscape is controlled by the underlying limestone, and soil components vary mainly in depth to rock and slope (Soil Survey of Hualapai-Havasupai Area, Arizona; 1999).

Map Units

Map units containing YUMTHESKA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Disterheff-Natank-Yumtheska complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes2158048522931rdwaz62319941:24000
Yumtheska-Natank complex, 10 to 45 percent slopes9539983522671rd1az62319941:24000
Yumtheska-Katzine-Rock outcrop complex, 2 to 30 percent slopes9329070522651rczaz62319941:24000
Yumtheska-Katzine-Rock outcrop complex, 5 to 50 percent slopes, moist9410832522661rd0az62319941:24000
Katzine-Rock outcrop-Yumtheska complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes426917523541rgvaz62319941:24000
Yumtheska very gravelly loam, 4 to 20 percent slopes7222566526031rqwaz62519921:24000
Yumtheska very gravelly loam, 30 to 50 percent slopes737170526051rqyaz62519921:24000
Yumtheska-Goesling complex, 1 to 15 percent slopes714113526021rqvaz62519921:24000
Yumtheska very gravelly loam, 4 to 30 percent slopes5122975541471tbpaz62919851:24000
Yumtheska-Houserock association, 4 to 20 percent slopes525391541491tbraz62919851:24000
Toqui-Yumtheska complex, 2 to 17 percent slopes35291071433812612zmz9az63119801:24000
Yumtheska-Tovar-Toqui complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes35305809338126530sf0az63119801:24000
Atarque-Yumtheska-Rock outcrop, 1 to 18 percent slopes332932191344148631kgxaz6951:24000
Toqui-Yumtheska-Rock outcrop complex, 2 to 17 percent slopes352920628344143831kggaz6951:24000
Chunkmonk-Yumtheska-Rock outcrop complex, 3 to 34 percent slopes3527520134414372zmyraz6951:24000
Yumtheska-Quagmeier complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes310450393441444315nsaz6951:24000
Yumtheska-Tovar-Toqui complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes35301980344148431kgraz6951:24000
Natank-Disterheff-Yumtheska complex, 2 to 35 percent slopes2787610544822v1b1az69919931:24000
Toqui-Yumtheska complex, 2 to 30 percent slopes4845860544931tpvaz69919931:24000
Disterheff-Yumtheska complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes3611219615923nnxhaz70120011:24000
Binsin-Bilburc-Yumtheska complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes97367615800nnsjaz70120011:24000
Tovar-Toqui-Yumtheska complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes1315700616023np0qaz70120011:24000
Yumtheska-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes1724312616064np21az70120011:24000
Yumtheska-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes1744142616066np23az70120011:24000
Yumtheska-Bilburc association, 10 to 45 percent slopes1703781616062np1zaz70120011:24000
Yumtheska-Toqui-Rock outcrop complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes1753693616067np24az70120011:24000
Yumtheska-Toqui-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 40 percent slopes1762795616068np25az70120011:24000
Natank-Yumtheska complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes841899615973nnz3az70120011:24000
Yumtheska-Rock outcrop complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes173371616065np22az70120011:24000
Yumtheska-Katzine-Rock outcrop complex, 2 to 30 percent slopes171145616063np20az70120011:24000
Natank-Disterheff-Yumtheska complex, 2 to 35 percent slopes83756159722v1b1az70120011:24000
Toqui-Yumtheska complex, 2 to 30 percent slops12549616017np0jaz70120011:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the YUMTHESKA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .