Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the WORTH soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of WORTH, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to WORTH were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
14088PA0790051988PA079005Worth3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.3583333,-76.2433333
14111N0184S10NY049004Worth5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.6118583,-75.6115028
n/a06N0347S2005NY049001Worth7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the WORTH soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the WORTH series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the WORTH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the WORTH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with WORTH share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the WORTH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the WORTH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with WORTH, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing WORTH as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Worth very fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, stonyWqb264026775162xj2tny03320181:24000
Worth very fine sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes, very stonyWsb208726774362xj32ny03320181:24000
Worth very fine sandy loam, 25 to 60 percent slopes, very stonyWte194526775542xj34ny03320181:24000
Worth very fine sandy loam, 8 to 25 percent slopes, very stonyWsd142626775292xj33ny03320181:24000
Worth very fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, stonyWqc63726774432xj2wny03320181:24000
Worth very fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, stonyWqa56126775402xj2sny03320181:24000
Stony land, Worth and Parishville soilsSk4042677532bmfvny03320181:24000
Worth very fine sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes3115D10125176652xj3cny03320181:24000
Worth-Empeyville Complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes3115C5131180842xj39ny04519811:15840
Worth-Empeyville Complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes3115C1965324792282xj39ny04920181:24000
Worth very fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, stonyWmC1785826778172xj2wny04920181:24000
Worth very fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, stonyWmB661926778162xj2tny04920181:24000
Highmarket-Worth complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes3211B594925070722xj3bny04920181:24000
Worth very fine sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes3115D508825042782xj3cny04920181:24000
Worth very fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, stonyWmD399026778182xj2yny04920181:24000
Worth very fine sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes, very stonyWnD22026778202xj35ny04920181:24000
Worth and Empeyville soils, 8 to 15 percent slopes, very stonyWSC1527537002xj36ny04920181:24000
Worth very fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, stony, warm838B1085914595162xj2vny06519931:24000
Worth very fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, stony, warm838C995014595182xj2xny06519931:24000
Worth very fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, stony121B49982933252xj2tny06519931:24000
Worth very fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, stony121C30222933262xj2wny06519931:24000
Worth very fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, stony, warm838D121214595202xj2zny06519931:24000
Worth very fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, stony121D5292933272xj2yny06519931:24000
Worth very fine sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes, stony, warm838E30714595222xj31ny06519931:24000
Worth-Empeyville Complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes3115C15331181062xj39ny06519931:24000
Worth very fine sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes3115D3331181032xj3cny06519931:24000
Worth very fine sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes, stony121E162933282xj30ny06519931:24000
Highmarket-Worth complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes3211B1431181072xj3bny06519931:24000
Worth and Empeyville soils, 8 to 15 percent slopes, very stonyWSC1111302941722xj36ny07519731:15840
Worth and Empeyville soils, 15 to 25 percent slopes, extremely stonyWYD70452941742xj38ny07519731:15840
Worth very fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, stonyWoB41722941682xj2tny07519731:15840
Worth and Empeyville soils, 15 to 25 percent slopes, very stonyWSD37082941732xj37ny07519731:15840
Worth very fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, stonyWoC25172941692xj2wny07519731:15840
Worth very fine sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes, stonyWRE21242941712xj30ny07519731:15840
Worth-Empeyville Complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes3115C34131181142xj39ny07519731:15840
Worth very fine sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes3115D8031181152xj3cny07519731:15840
Highmarket-Worth complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes3211B731181162xj3bny07519731:15840
Worth extremely stony sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopesWrB20062963809ydnpa08919751:20000
Worth extremely stony sandy loam, 8 to 25 percent slopesWrC13052963819ydppa08919751:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the WORTH soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .