Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the WINT soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of WINT, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to WINT were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the WINT soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the WINT series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the sibling sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the WINT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the WINT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with WINT share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the competing sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the WINT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the WINT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with WINT, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing WINT as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Kandaly-Moyerson-Wint complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes3318562612002jx0rwy0411:24000
Wint-Robay-like-Tasselman complex, 20 to 60 percent slopes551029118602w7hbwy6291:24000
Kandaly-Moyerson-Wint complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes226129032455467jx0rwy6301:24000
Wint-Tasselman complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes -- draft213713423785462kv29wy6301:24000
Leckman-Wint complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes -- draft203438323785442kv27wy6301:24000
Wint-Rock outcrop-Tasselman, 6 to 30 percent slopes -- draft212223423785472kv2bwy6301:24000
Rock Outcrop-Haterton-Wint complex, steep -- draft24563425730402r81vwy6301:24000
Kandaly-Moyerson-Wint complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes267D114742611946jx0rwy7231:24000
Wint very gravelly sandy loam, 3 to 15 percent slopes -- draft150269125187472q04cwy7231:24000
Wint-Cragosen complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes245819627716382mqj9wy7231:24000
Rock outcrop-Thermopolis, very rubbly surface-Wint, stony surface, complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes440332223652zjtpwy7371:24000
Wint-Frinton complex, 4 to 25 percent slopes430232223132zjt9wy7371:24000
Kandaly-Moyerson-Wint complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes463595122572267jx0rwy7371:24000
Wint-Cragosen complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes24583541425723132mqj9wy7371:24000
Wint-Tasselman complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes --draft24512142325723192mr7pwy7371:24000
Wint channery sandy loam, 2 to 20 percent slopes -- draft24171611225723182mr7lwy7371:24000
Kandaly-Wint-Huguston complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes -- draft2476494525723042l3z4wy7371:24000
Leckman-Wint complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes -- draft720357325724092pgmcwy7371:24000
Wint-Tasselman complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes -- draft151C282572241jwynwy7371:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the WINT soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .