Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the WINFALL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of WINFALL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to WINFALL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the WINFALL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the WINFALL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the WINFALL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the WINFALL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with WINFALL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the WINFALL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the WINFALL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with WINFALL, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing WINFALL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Winfall-Rumblecreek gravelly loams, 2 to 8 slopes171C28129955214wgtmt60319891:24000
Winfall-Rumblecreek gravelly loams, 8 to 25 slopes171E23229955224wgvmt60319891:24000
Winfall-Rumblecreek gravelly loams, 25 to 50 percent slopes171F10329955234wgwmt60319891:24000
Winfall gravelly loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes71C9129955414wskmt60319891:24000
Winfall gravelly loam, 25 to 50 percent slopes71F3929955424wsmmt60319891:24000
Winfall-Courville complex, dry, 8 to 30 percent slopes138E122995455mhlfmt60319891:24000
Winfall gravelly loam, 8 to 30 percent slopes34E3299559257b4mt60319891:24000
Pleasantvalley-Winfall, dry complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes222E17317581628mj76mt61820081:24000
Pleasantvalley-Winfall, dry-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes223E6324581629mj77mt61820081:24000
Courville-Stevie-Winfall complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes35F4345581658mj85mt61820081:24000
Pleasantvalley-Winfall, dry-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes223F3472796649vqzcmt61820081:24000
Winfall-Courville complex, dry, 8 to 30 percent slopes138E2459581015mhlfmt61820081:24000
Courville-Winfall complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes35D2018115140017n3ymt61820081:24000
Pleasantvalley-Winfall, dry complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes222C2002581662mj89mt61820081:24000
Winfall gravelly loam, 8 to 30 percent slopes34E13615705158f5mt61820081:24000
Courville-Winfall complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes35D20624099252lwqjmt61919881:24000
Pleasantvalley-Winfall, dry-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes223F17624099472lwr7mt61919881:24000
Pleasantvalley-Winfall, dry complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes222E14824099462lwr6mt61919881:24000
Winfall-Courville complex, dry, 8 to 30 percent slopes138E14424099452lwr5mt61919881:24000
Courville-Stevie-Winfall complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes35F5824099272lwqlmt61919881:24000
Winfall very gravelly loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes18329461450954vzhmt62919911:20000
Winfall very gravelly loam, 30 to 60 percent slopes18415551450974vzkmt62919911:20000
Winfall very gravelly loam, 4 to 15 percent slopes18214991450944vzgmt62919911:20000
Winfall very gravelly loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes, lake effect21168917160061vln1mt62919911:20000
Courville-Winfall complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes35D1024099012lwprmt62919911:20000
Pleasantvalley-Winfall, dry complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes222E255824098662lwnmmt63419881:24000
Courville-Winfall complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes35D130824098602lwnfmt63419881:24000
Pleasantvalley-Winfall, dry-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes223E48924098672lwnnmt63419881:24000
Courville-Stevie-Winfall complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes35F44724098622lwnhmt63419881:24000
Pleasantvalley-Winfall, dry-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes223F30724098682lwnpmt63419881:24000
Winfall gravelly loam, 4 to 30 percent slopes129123511454194w9ymt63819851:24000
Winfall-Rumblecreek gravelly loams, 8 to 25 slopes171E49851455714wgvmt64419951:24000
Winfall-Rumblecreek gravelly loams, 2 to 8 slopes171C46301455704wgtmt64419951:24000
Winfall gravelly loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes71C37001458724wskmt64419951:24000
Winfall gravelly loam, 8 to 25 percent slopes71E15771458734wslmt64419951:24000
Winfall gravelly loam, 25 to 50 percent slopes71F12721458744wsmmt64419951:24000
Winfall-Rumblecreek gravelly loams, 25 to 50 percent slopes171F10711455724wgwmt64419951:24000
Winfall gravelly loam, 8 to 30 percent slopes34E989515599657b4mt65119971:24000
Winfall-Courville complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes134E2106155819574fmt65119971:24000
Winfall-Courville complex, dry, 8 to 30 percent slopes138E1016155821574hmt65119971:24000
Winfall-Courville complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes522F60215613657gnmt65119971:24000
Winfall gravelly loam, 30 to 50 percent slopes34F41515599757b5mt65119971:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the WINFALL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .