Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the WINDER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of WINDER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to WINDER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
155S49_0311975-FL097-S49_031Winder3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties27.7699203,-81.1607742
155S56_0331977-FL111-S56_033Winder3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties27.4189758,-80.3660965
155S18_0061990-FL035-S18_006Winder3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties29.4460297,-81.3246613
155S54_012S1983FL107012Winder3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties29.679245,-81.5253448
156BS50_0141973-FL099-S50_014Winder3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties26.8391991,-80.1691437
156BS56_0201976-FL111-S56_020Winder3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties27.5454922,-80.6110535
156BS56_0281976-FL111-S56_028Winder3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties27.3545647,-80.4633484
156BS43_0191977-FL085-S43_019Winder3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties27.1283493,-80.4865036
156BS56_0341977-FL111-S56_034Winder3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties27.5094509,-80.6524658

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the WINDER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the WINDER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the WINDER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the WINDER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with WINDER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the WINDER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the WINDER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with WINDER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing WINDER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Winder loamy sand73864714733581lg4pfl00919901:24000
Riviera and Winder soils20534914733061lg30fl00919901:24000
EauGallie, Winder, and Riviera soils, depressional18502614733041lg2yfl00919901:24000
Riviera and Winder soils, depressional21499114733071lg31fl00919901:24000
Winder sand, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes621316731029192x9f9fl01519821:20000
Winder sand, ponded-Urban land complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes1394930458762x9fbfl01519821:20000
Winder fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes102130015294122svzsfl03519911:15840
Favoretta, Chobee, and Winder soils, frequently flooded71540015294491nbj2fl03519911:15840
Winder fine sand, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes591753011514452svzvfl05119861:24000
Winder fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes1260011514132svzsfl05119861:24000
Winder fine sand, frequently flooded602781014070101j73ffl05719861:20000
Winder fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes591060014070082svzsfl05719861:20000
Winder fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes14206537567392svztfl06119841:20000
Winder sand, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes62122631029202x9f9fl07119821:20000
Winder sand, ponded-Urban land complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes13920931029232x9fbfl07119821:20000
Winder sand, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes19850231029212x9f9fl08519791:20000
Winder loamy fine sand47577014838871lt3bfl09719761:20000
Winder fine sand, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes85511314250672svzvfl10519871:20000
Winder fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes3331503233982svzsfl10719851:15840
Winder fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes68291513920642svzsfl10919811:20000
Winder fine sand, frequently flooded48253013920451hqjpfl10919811:20000
Winder loamy sand553713914212121jpwkfl11119901:24000
Winder sand, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes54461231029222x9f9fl11119901:24000
Winder sand, shell substratum56155514212131jpwlfl11119901:24000
Winder fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes77188015441832svzsfl12719771:20000
Winder fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes50652014073092svztfl61119941:20000
Winder, Riviera, limestone substratum, and Chobee soils, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes433027531029732y9fzfl62119891:24000
Chobee, Winder, Gator soils, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes221259231029552y9fdfl62119891:24000
Chobee, Winder, Gator soils, ponded-Urban land complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes10644831029562y9fffl62119891:24000
Winder, Riviera, limestone substratum, and Chobee soils, ponded-Urban land complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes1362531029742y9g0fl62119891:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the WINDER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .