Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the WILMINGTON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of WILMINGTON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to WILMINGTON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
14379P02851979VT025006Wilmington7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.9722214,-72.8458328
1432013NH6050032013NH605003Wilmington1Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.0934324,-71.8048859
1432013NH6050042013NH605004Wilmington1Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.0982405,-71.8096233
1432013NH6050172013NH605017Wilmington1Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.0676181,-71.8413999
1432013NH6050222013NH605022Wilmington1Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.104858,-71.8081503
1432013NH6050242013NH605024Wilmington1Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.0877083,-71.7846444
1432013NH6050292013NH605029Wilmington1Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.0771444,-71.8071417
1432013NH6050442013NH605044Wilmington1Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.13505,-71.8239111
1432013NH6050562013NH605056Wilmington1Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.057825,-71.8469389
1432013NH6050572013NH605057Wilmington1Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.0461556,-71.8534333
1432013NH6050632013NH605063Wilmington1Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.0589361,-71.8402639
1432013NH6050742013NH605074Wilmington1Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.0537444,-71.7770583
1432014NH6050272014NH605027Wilmington1Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.0990972,-71.795925
14390P087688NY041012Wilmington4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.3291664,-74.7561111
14309N1060S09VT009003Wilmington6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.894722,-71.6711121
14309N1061S09VT009004Wilmington7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.8922234,-71.6816635
144B2013NH6050392013NH605039Wilmington1Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.0725306,-71.84285
n/aCT-0051954-OH027-005Wilmington3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the WILMINGTON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the WILMINGTON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the WILMINGTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the WILMINGTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with WILMINGTON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the WILMINGTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the WILMINGTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with WILMINGTON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. VT-2012-03-22-12 | Windham County - February 1987

    Typical landscape pattern of soils and underlying material in the Houghton-Rawsonville-Mundal general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Windham County, VT; 1987).

Map Units

Map units containing WILMINGTON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Ampersand-Wilmington complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes, very bouldery934C363314608381l13tny03120071:24000
Ampersand-Wilmington complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes, very bouldery934C2011913270226xdny03320181:24000
Wilmington-Tahawus complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes, very bouldery938B3925216502ql2yny03320181:24000
Worden-Wilmington complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes, very bouldery935C1731181179sv3ny03520071:24000
Rawsonville-Wilmington-Hogback complex, 0 to 25 percent slopes, very rocky942C126112919979sv8ny04119941:62500
Worden-Wilmington complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes, very bouldery935C103672919929sv3ny04119941:62500
Wilmington-Tughill complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes, very bouldery937B29182919939sv4ny04119941:62500
Ampersand-Wilmington complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes, very bouldery934C11193118079226xdny04119941:62500
Ampersand-Wilmington complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes, very bouldery934C64432514972226xdny04320181:24000
Wilmington-Tahawus complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes, very bouldery938B193825216492ql2yny04320181:24000
Worden-Wilmington complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes, very bouldery935C6726775779sv3ny04320181:24000
Rawsonville-Wilmington-Hogback complex, 0 to 25 percent slopes, very rocky942C2225216529sv8ny04320181:24000
Mundal-Wilmington association, rolling, very stony903C191242816129g18vt00319921:20000
Wilmington-Mundal association, undulating, very stony923B89672816279g1rvt00319921:20000
Wilmington sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes, very stony100B28102813282ty6mvt00319921:20000
Tunbridge-Peru-Wilmington complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes, very stonySIE412590924099752xk1kvt00920121:
Wilmington-Colonel complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes, very stonySIE212023024099662xk1fvt00920121:
Wilmington-Colonel complex, 3 to 8 percent slopesSIE21N51925050032q47lvt00920121:
Tunbridge-Peru-Wilmington complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes, rockySIE41N51225050062q47pvt00920121:
Wilmington sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes, very stony31B105752819992ty6mvt02519841:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the WILMINGTON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .