Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the WILLIS soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of WILLIS, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to WILLIS were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
892P0075S1991WA001003Willis7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties47.2041664,-118.476387

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the WILLIS soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the WILLIS series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the WILLIS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the WILLIS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with WILLIS share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the WILLIS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the WILLIS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with WILLIS, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. WA-2012-05-11-15 | Benton County Area - July 1971

    Cross section of Benton County, showing the relationship of elevation, precipitation, and major soil series (Soil Survey of Benton County Area, Washington; April 1980).

Map Units

Map units containing WILLIS as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Willis silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes56B123446111721ljor02119781:24000
Willis silt loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes56C27726111821lkor02119781:24000
Willis silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes56D7186111921llor02119781:24000
Willis silt loam, 20 to 30 percent slopes56E3356112021lmor02119781:24000
Willis silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes75B135776139321wfor64819771:24000
Willis silt loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes75C91706139421wgor64819771:24000
Willis silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes75D7896139521whor64819771:24000
Willis silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes121B62764439251por66719841:20000
Willis silt loam, 12 to 30 percent slopes121D53264441251ror66719841:20000
Willis silt loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes121C22864440251qor66719841:20000
Willis silt loam, 0 to 15 percent slopesWSC12771682952922wa00119651:20000
Willis silt loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes, erodedWSC22637682962923wa00119651:20000
Willis silt loam, shallow, 0 to 15 percent slopesWTC259682972924wa00119651:20000
Renslow-Achelake-Willis complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes2903132701373rjtywa01719981:12000
Renslow-Achelake-Willis complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes2911111701374rjtzwa01719981:12000
Willis silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes471997699564rgylwa01719981:12000
Willis silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes470551699563rgykwa01719981:12000
Willis silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes472234699565rgymwa01719981:12000
Cashmere-Willis complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes85151700667rj35wa01719981:12000
Cashmere-Willis complex, 30 to 45 percent slopes86110700684rj3qwa01719981:12000
Willis silt loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes216207716812dl9wa02119941:20000
Renslow-Willis silt loams, 0 to 15 percent slopes107175186869929h3wa02519791:24000
Willis silt loam, 0 to 10 percent slopes18562246878529kwwa02519791:24000
Renslow-Willis silt loams, 15 to 25 percent slopes10820406870029h4wa02519791:24000
Willis silt loam, 5 to 25 percent slopes80303856868129gjwa04319781:24000
Willis variant silt loam, 5 to 25 percent slopes8162856868229gkwa04319781:24000
Willis silt loam, shallow, 0 to 15 percent slopesWtD17044696262bg0wa60519651:20000
Willis silt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopesWsB9997696232bfxwa60519651:20000
Willis silt loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes, severely erodedWsE33517696242bfywa60519651:20000
Willis silt loam, 30 to 65 percent slopesWsF808696252bfzwa60519651:20000
Willis silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes350322762992kd8wa63920031:24000
Willis silt loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes352206763012kdbwa63920031:24000
Willis silt loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes353189763022kdcwa63920031:24000
Willis silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes351170763002kd9wa63920031:24000
Willis silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes189114066897929s4wa67719791:24000
Willis silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes187100256897729s2wa67719791:24000
Willis silt loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes18817536897829s3wa67719791:24000
Willis fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes1864596897629s1wa67719791:24000
Willis silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes2121042712672d4ywa68119941:24000
Willis silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes214848712692d50wa68119941:24000
Willis silt loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes21364712682d4zwa68119941:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the WILLIS soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .