Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the WICHITA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of WICHITA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to WICHITA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
78C40A4464MLRA78-Wichita-TX207-0294Wichita5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties33.1666679,-99.8266678
78C40A4465MLRA78-Wichita-TX275-0299Wichita5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties33.584446,-99.8274994

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the WICHITA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the WICHITA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the WICHITA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the WICHITA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with WICHITA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the WICHITA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the WICHITA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with WICHITA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. TX-2012-03-21-70 | Shackelford County - February 1990

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Leeray-Pitzer-Wichita map unit (Soil Survey of Shackelford County, TX; 1990).

  2. TX-2012-03-21-83 | Stephens County - May 1994

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Bastrop-Minwells general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Stephens County, TX; 1994).

Map Units

Map units containing WICHITA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Wichita clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesWhB10853362458d556tx00919861:24000
Wichita clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesWhA1313362457d555tx00919861:24000
Wichita loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesWhB2780362504d56ptx01119631:20000
Wichita loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesWhC908362505d56qtx01119631:20000
Wichita loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesWhA633362503d56ntx01119631:20000
Wichita-Lutie loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesWlA16835364132d6x6tx08719651:20000
Wichita-Lutie loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesWlC5728364133d6x7tx08719651:20000
Wichita-Lutie loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, erodedWlC2994364134d6x8tx08719651:20000
Wichita clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesWmA18821365824d8nstx15119641:24000
Wichita clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesWmB17322365825d8nttx15119641:24000
Wichita loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesWhB8326365823d8nrtx15119641:24000
Wichita loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesWhA5109365822d8nqtx15119641:24000
Wichita loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesWtA413831010481ljlftx15520211:24000
Wichita loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesWtB180631010491ljlgtx15520211:24000
Wichita clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesWuB77031010471ljldtx15520211:24000
Wichita clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesWcA10058367539dbg3tx20719601:20000
Wichita clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesWcB6554367540dbg4tx20719601:20000
Wichita clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes, erodedWcB2941367541dbg5tx20719601:20000
Wichita silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesWhB7982368512dcghtx26319681:31680
Wichita silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesWhC3255368513dcgjtx26319681:31680
Wichita clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes4210119368745dcq0tx27519751:24000
Wichita clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes438370368746dcq1tx27519751:24000
Wichita clay loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes442230368747dcq2tx27519751:24000
Wichita clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesWhB4131390978f3v6tx36319791:24000
Wichita clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesWcB6299372093dh60tx41719851:24000
Wichita clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesWcA3174372092dh5ztx41719851:24000
Wichita clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesWcB1382372231dhbgtx42919851:24000
Wichita clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesWcA246372230dhbftx42919851:24000
Wichita clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesWtB2630372727dhvgtx44719911:24000
Wichita clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesWcB22749373456djlztx48719601:20000
Wichita clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesWcA2369373455djlytx48719601:20000
Wichita clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesWhB687617187nq78tx50320031:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the WICHITA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .