Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the WATERCANYON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of WATERCANYON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to WATERCANYON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
1386P091986ID005001Watercanyon8Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.8976898,-112.3605576
1386P092086ID005002Watercanyon8Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.8979683,-112.3611145
2582P090382ID031004Watercanyon7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.4900017,-113.476387
43B89P011189ID007001Watercanyon6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.2716675,-111.242775

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the WATERCANYON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the WATERCANYON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the WATERCANYON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the WATERCANYON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with WATERCANYON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the WATERCANYON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the WATERCANYON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with WATERCANYON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing WATERCANYON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Watercanyon-Vitale-Rexburg association, 30 to 50 percent slopes1579067824762rtjid70819871:24000
Watercanyon silt loam, 4 to 12 percent slopes1552399824742rtgid70819871:24000
Watercanyon silt loam, 20 to 40 percent slopes156833824752rthid70819871:24000
Cedarhill-Ririe-Watercanyon complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes302421231635262v05zid71119831:24000
Ririe-Watercanyon complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes1012196131635572szwlid71119831:24000
Ririe-Watercanyon complex, 4 to 12 percent slopes1001181031635562szwmid71119831:24000
Valmar, low precipitation-Watercanyon-Hondoho complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes119921131635622szwfid71119831:24000
Ririe-Watercanyon-Cedarhill complex, 12 to 30 percent slopes103733531635582szwkid71119831:24000
Wursten-Watercanyon variant-Hondoho complex, 12 to 40 percent slopes1235115828772s7gid71119831:24000
Lanoak-Watercanyon-Rexburg complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes73391531635452szx1id71119831:24000
Watercanyon-Swanner-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes1212004828752s7did71119831:24000
Ririe-Watercanyon complex, 20 to 30 percent slopes102970828542s6qid71119831:24000
Watercanyon silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes120502828742s7cid71119831:24000
Iphil-Watercanyon complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes110338615430155kgid71220081:24000
Iphil-Lanoak-Watercanyon complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes10950015430355kjid71220081:24000
Rexburg-Watercanyon complex, 4 to 12 percent slopes17942015435155m2id71220081:24000
Iphil-Watercanyon complex, dry, 4 to 12 percent slopes111346791549vknvid71220081:24000
Cedarhill-Ririe-Watercanyon complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes3057925146002v05zid7131:24000
Ririe-Watercanyon-Cedarhill complex, 12 to 30 percent slopes10323725202112szwkid7131:24000
Ririe-Watercanyon complex, 4 to 12 percent slopes10012125118382szwmid7131:24000
Ririe-Watercanyon complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes1018525118392szwlid7131:24000
Lanoak-Watercanyon-Rexburg complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes735225145892szx1id7131:24000
Rexburg-Watercanyon-Lanoak complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes1051726199102v07bid7131:24000
Valmar, low precipitation-Watercanyon-Hondoho complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes119125202142szwfid7131:24000
Rexburg-Watercanyon-Lanoak complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes105217931636072v07bid71519941:24000
Rexburg-Lanoak-Watercanyon complex, 4 to 12 percent slopes1021595485569j98jid71519941:24000
Ririe-Watercanyon complex, 12 to 30 percent slopes1181571485586j992id71519941:24000
Rexburg-Iphil-Watercanyon complex, 12 to 30 percent slopes991479485698j9dpid71519941:24000
Ririe-Watercanyon complex, 4 to 12 percent slopes1171085485585j991id71519941:24000
Iphil-Ririe-Watercanyon complex, 8 to 20 percent slopes50490485645j9bzid71519941:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the WATERCANYON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .