Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the VINING soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of VINING, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to VINING were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the VINING soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the VINING series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the VINING series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the VINING series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with VINING share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the VINING series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the VINING series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with VINING, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. ID-2010-08-31-13 | Wood River Area, Gooding County and Parts of Blaine, Lincoln, and Minidoka Counties - 2005

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in general soil map unit 10 (Soil Survey of Wood River Area, Idaho; 2005).

Map Units

Map units containing VINING as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Vining-Kecko-Rock outcrop complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes20674448819442r8cid68119931:24000
Vining-Kecko-Starbuck complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes20715360819452r8did68119931:24000
Vining-Paulville complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes2082440819462r8fid68119931:24000
Kecko-Vining-Rock outcrop complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes1011515818272r4lid68119931:24000
Vining very stony fine sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes170512225195322qzcid68520121:24000
Vining-Kecko-Rock outcrop complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes4616284801032pbzid70219991:24000
Vining loamy sand, 1 to 8 percent slopes442438801012pbxid70219991:24000
Vining sandy loam, 1 to 8 percent slopes451428801022pbyid70219991:24000
Vining sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes651054824012rr3id70719761:24000
Vining fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes152286824712rtcid70819871:24000
Vining-Wapi-Rock outcrop complex, rolling918076826722s0vid70919761:24000
Vining-Quincy-Rock outcrop complex, undulating906858826712s0tid70919761:24000
Kecko-Clems-Vining association, undulating243085825982rygid70919761:24000
Quincy-Declo-Vining association, rolling771313826562s0bid70919761:24000
Vining-Kecko-Rock outcrop complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes118591692148r77cid70919761:24000
Vining-Kecko-Rock outcrop complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes82384315326761nfw5id78019981:24000
Vining-Wapi-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 12 percent slopes8357015326811nfwbid78019981:24000
Vining-Tuffo complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes34115574490770jgp9or62819971:24000
Vining loam, 2 to 20 percent slopes3404139490769jgp8or62819971:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the VINING soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .