Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the VINA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of VINA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to VINA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the VINA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the VINA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the VINA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the VINA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with VINA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the VINA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the VINA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with VINA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. CA-2010-08-30-06 | Colusa County - 2006

    Typical pattern of soils along the Sacramento River, near the city of Colusa (Soil Survey of Colusa County, California; 2006).

Map Units

Map units containing VINA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Vina loam, silt loam substratum, 0 to 2 percent slopes, MLRA 17171173884615802w8bbca01119991:24000
Vina loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded1703559461579hh9nca01119991:24000
Vina fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded1721857461581hh9qca01119991:24000
Vina loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded1741540461582hh9rca01119991:24000
Vina fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, MLRA 1723312204619772w8b7ca06719891:24000
Vina fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded234600461978hhqjca06719891:24000
Vina fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, MLRA 1727218304621642w8b7ca07719901:24000
Vina loam, flood-plain steps, 0 to 5 percent slopes, MLRA 17VeA13604601572w8b8ca60719671:20000
Vina loam, seeped, 0 to 3 percent slopesVfA256460158hfttca60719671:20000
Vina gravelly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesVgB232460159hftvca60719671:20000
Vina fine sandy loam, sandy substratum, 0 to 2 percent slopes, MLRA 1742564754611822w8b6ca61220051:24000
Vina loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, MLRA 1742610574611832w8b9ca61220051:24000
Vina loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, MLRA 17VnA78354609622w8b9ca64519611:20000
Vina clay loam, deep, 0 to 3 percent slopesVy1111460965hgnvca64519611:20000
Vina loam, water table, 0 to 3 percent slopesVw473460964hgntca64519611:20000
Vina loam, deep, 0 to 3 percent slopesVd173460961hgnqca64519611:20000
Vina loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesVnB86460963hgnsca64519611:20000
Vina silty clay loam, 2 to 9 percent slopesVsC1252457791hccgca67419681:24000
Vina loam, 2 to 9 percent slopesVaC709457789hccdca67419681:24000
Vina gravelly loam, 2 to 9 percent slopesVnC567457790hccfca67419681:24000
Vina loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes, MLRA 19VaA1604577882w8bcca67419681:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the VINA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .