Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the UMAPINE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of UMAPINE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to UMAPINE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
1087P003186OR001003Umapine6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.8644447,-117.769722

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the UMAPINE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the UMAPINE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the UMAPINE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the UMAPINE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with UMAPINE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the UMAPINE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the UMAPINE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with UMAPINE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. WA-2010-11-05-09 | Klickitat County - 2009

    Representative landscape cross section of the soils in the eastern part of the survey area (Soil Survey of Klickitat County, Washington; 2009).

  2. WA-2012-05-11-47 | Klickitat County Area - December 2009

    Representative landscape cross-section of the soils in the eastern part of the survey area (Soil Survey of Klickitat County Area, Washington; December 2009).

Map Units

Map units containing UMAPINE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Umapine silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes170A59696216522pbor60419881:24000
Stanflow-Umapine silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes159A48776214522npor60419881:24000
Umapine silt loam6265566400724lror62519791:20000
Umapine silt loam34231006284223d5or64119751:20000
Umapine silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded1905150724860682pfyror6451:24000
Umapine silt loam, reclaimed, 0 to 3 percent slopes106A360464417250zor66719841:20000
Umapine silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes105A88264416250yor66719841:20000
Umapine silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesUMA69268275291fwa00119651:20000
Umapine silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesUmA51468276291gwa00119651:20000
Umapine loamy sand, overwash, 0 to 2 percent slopesUoA42568277291hwa00119651:20000
Umapine silt loam17241836877129kfwa02519791:24000
Umapine silt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopesUmB544696032bf8wa60519651:20000
Umapine silt loam, drained, 0 to 2 percent slopesUpA182696042bf9wa60519651:20000
Umapine silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes1811390761982k90wa63920031:24000
Umapine silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesUmA1936714532dbywa67119611:31680
Umapine very fine sandy loam, leached surface, 0 to 3 percent slopesUwA1443714562dc1wa67119611:31680
Umapine silt loam, leached surface, 0 to 3 percent slopesUpA1356714542dbzwa67119611:31680
Umapine very fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesUvA1137714552dc0wa67119611:31680
Umapine silt loam, dry, 2 to 5 percent slopes5901510867752x96wa67620141:12000
Umapine silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes590210862872wsgwa67620141:12000
Umapine silt loam, drained, 0 to 2 percent slopes16994836895729rfwa67719791:24000
Umapine silt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes1683126895629rdwa67719791:24000
Umapine silt loam, drained, 2 to 5 percent slopes1702846895929rhwa67719791:24000
Umapine silt loamUm126106912629xwwa67819701:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the UMAPINE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .