Soil Data Explorer - TYNER

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the TYNER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of TYNER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to TYNER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
115C	83P0239	81IL017006	Tyner	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	39.9672203,-90.4175034
122	LW8010	1980IN093010	Tyner	2	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	38.8024361,-86.43345
139	69PA019003	1969PA019003	Tyner	5	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	40.9736111,-80.1283333
98	PR7609	1976IN127009	Tyner	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	41.4114528,-86.9405528
98	93P0409	S1993IN039002	Tyner	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	41.7383347,-85.7555542
98	93P0410	S1993IN039003	Tyner	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	41.7374992,-85.7555542
n/a	LK-015	1969-OH085-015	Tyner	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the TYNER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the TYNER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-02-21), parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the TYNER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the TYNER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with TYNER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the TYNER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the TYNER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with TYNER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. IN-2010-09-24-01 | Elkhart County -

   Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Tyner-Osolo-Brems association (Soil Survey of Elkhart County, Indiana).

2. IN-2010-09-24-02 | Elkhart County -

   Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Bristol-Vistula-Bronson association (Soil Survey of Elkhart County, Indiana).

3. IN-2010-09-24-03 | Elkhart County -

   Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Riddles-Oshtemo association (Soil Survey of Elkhart County, Indiana).

4. IN-2010-09-27-01 | St. Joseph County -

   Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Tyner-Osolo-Brems association (Soil Survey of St. Joseph County, Indiana).

5. IN-2010-09-27-02 | St. Joseph County -

   Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Gilford-Morocco-Maumee association (Soil Survey of St. Joseph County, Indiana).

6. IN-2010-09-27-05 | St. Joseph County -

   Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Bainter-Schoolcraft association (Soil Survey of St. Joseph County, Indiana).

7. IN-2010-09-27-07 | St. Joseph County -

   Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Tracy-Hillsdale-Tyner association (Soil Survey of St. Joseph County, Indiana).

8. IN-2012-01-19-13 | Elkhart County - April 1974

   Relationship of soils to topography and underlying materials in the Plainfield-Chelsea-Tyner association (Soil Survey of Elkhart County, Indiana; 1974).

9. IN-2012-01-19-37 | Lake County - July 1972

   Rensselaer-Gilford soil association (Soil Survey of Lake County, Indiana; 1972).

10. OH-2010-09-29-02 | Ashtabula County - 2007

    Representative pattern of soils and parent materials in the Conneaut-Painesville-Elnora association (Soil Survey of Ashtabula County, Ohio; 2007).

Map Units

Map units containing TYNER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Tyner loamy sand, 0 to 1 percent slopes	TxuA	14996	165475	5k5x	in039	1997	1:12000
Urban land-Tyner complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes	UgvA	4147	165511	5k72	in039	1997	1:12000
Tyner loamy sand, 1 to 5 percent slopes	TxuB	3330	165476	5k5y	in039	1997	1:12000
Tyner loamy sand, 5 to 10 percent slopes	TxuC	943	165477	5k5z	in039	1997	1:12000
Tyner loamy sand, 10 to 18 percent slopes	TxuD	498	165478	5k60	in039	1997	1:12000
Riddles-Tyner complex, 18 to 30 percent slopes	RosE	415	165461	5k5g	in039	1997	1:12000
Urban land-Tyner complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes	UgvB	405	165512	5k73	in039	1997	1:12000
Tyner loamy sand, 18 to 45 percent slopes	TxuF	322	165479	5k61	in039	1997	1:12000
Tyner loamy fine sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes	TyB	1344	272503	94kf	in089	1967	1:15840
Tyner loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes	TyA	8556	272700	94rs	in091	1979	1:15840
Tyner loamy sand, 1 to 5 percent slopes	TxuB	1967	1702570	1v4nm	in099	1978	1:15840
Tyner loamy sand, 0 to 1 percent slopes	TxuA	1103	2451239	2n8q7	in099	1978	1:15840
Tyner loamy sand, 5 to 10 percent slopes	TxuC	782	1702571	1v4nn	in099	1978	1:15840
Urban land-Tyner complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes	UgvA	118	2485513	2pfcv	in099	1978	1:15840
Urban land-Tyner complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes	UgvB	63	2485514	2pfcw	in099	1978	1:15840
Urban land-Tyner complex, 10 to 18 percent slopes	UgvD	8	2485524	2pfd6	in099	1978	1:15840
Urban land-Tyner complex, 5 to 10 percent slopes	UgvC	4	2485523	2pfd5	in099	1978	1:15840
Tyner loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes	TyA	2238	160691	5d6l	in127	1978	1:15840
Urban land-Tyner complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes	UgvA	21373	612243	nk2s	in141	2001	1:12000
Tyner loamy sand, 0 to 1 percent slopes	TxuA	3405	200326	6qg4	in141	2001	1:12000
Urban land-Tyner complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes	UgvB	1950	615116	nn2g	in141	2001	1:12000
Urban land-Tyner complex, 5 to 10 percent slopes	UgvC	1734	612248	nk2y	in141	2001	1:12000
Urban land-Tyner complex, 10 to 18 percent slopes	UgvD	718	612249	nk2z	in141	2001	1:12000
Tyner loamy sand, 1 to 5 percent slopes	TxuB	712	612370	nk6w	in141	2001	1:12000
Tyner loamy sand, 5 to 10 percent slopes	TxuC	665	200318	6qfw	in141	2001	1:12000
Tyner loamy sand, 10 to 18 percent slopes	TxuD	638	614148	nm27	in141	2001	1:12000
Tyner loamy sand, 18 to 45 percent slopes	TxuF	2	628153	p2n0	in141	2001	1:12000
Tyner-Otisville complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes	TyB	2992	298922	b11n	oh007	2001	1:12000
Urban land-Tyner-Otisville complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes	UtB	829	298926	b11s	oh007	2001	1:12000
Tyner loamy sand, 1 to 6 percent slopes	TyB	7650	286846	9mh3	oh085	1976	1:15840
Tyner loamy sand, 6 to 12 percent slopes	TyC	477	286847	9mh4	oh085	1976	1:15840
Tyner loamy sand, 1 to 6 percent slopes	TyB	510	287816	9nhd	oh093	1972	1:15840
Tyner loamy sand, 6 to 12 percent slopes	TyC	133	287817	9nhf	oh093	1972	1:15840
Harborcreek-Tyner complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes	HkB	9223	2633067	2rg7c	pa049	2012	1:12000
Urban land-Tyner-Harborcreek complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes	UtB	4417	2633090	2rg83	pa049	2012	1:12000
Tyner and Harborcreek soils, 25 to 60 percent slopes	TxF	1731	2633068	2rg7d	pa049	2012	1:12000
Harborcreek-Tyner complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes	HkC	1047	2633107	2rg8n	pa049	2012	1:12000
Harborcreek-Tyner complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes	HkD	417	2633123	2rg95	pa049	2012	1:12000
Tyner sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes	TyA	395	2633140	2rhrw	pa049	2012	1:12000
Tyner sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes	TyB	350	2633141	2rhrx	pa049	2012	1:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the TYNER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2023-10-04).