Soil Data Explorer - TUTHILL

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the TUTHILL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of TUTHILL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to TUTHILL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
64	88P0178	1987NE161036	Tuthill	5	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	42.7349583,-102.0676917
64	88P0177	87NE161035	Tuthill	5	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	42.7316666,-102.0769424
64	89P0027	88NE031031	Tuthill	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	42.7886124,-102.0636139

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the TUTHILL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the TUTHILL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-02-21), parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-02) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the TUTHILL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the TUTHILL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with TUTHILL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-02) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the TUTHILL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the TUTHILL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with TUTHILL, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. SD-2012-03-15-97 | Todd County - April 1974

   Typical pattern of soils in association 2 (Soil Survey of Todd County, SD; 1974).

2. SD-2012-03-15-98 | Todd County - April 1974

   Typical pattern of soils in association 4 (Soil Survey of Todd County, SD; 1974).

Map Units

Map units containing TUTHILL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Tuthill fine sandy loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes	5266	4389	100435	3chv	ne031	1995	1:24000
Tuthill fine sandy loam, 6 to 9 percent slopes	5267	766	100436	3chw	ne031	1995	1:24000
Tuthill fine sandy loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes	5266	23126	100647	3cqp	ne161	1992	1:20000
Tuthill fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes	5265	20233	100646	3cqn	ne161	1992	1:20000
Tuthill loamy fine sand, 3 to 9 percent slopes	5269	13708	100645	3cqm	ne161	1992	1:20000
Tuthill fine sandy loam, 6 to 9 percent slopes	5267	4955	100648	3cqq	ne161	1992	1:20000
Tuthill loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes	5268	4035	100644	3cql	ne161	1992	1:20000
Tuthill-Anselmo fine sandy loams, 0 to 5 percent slopes	TnB	13197	352762	cv2f	sd007	2004	1:20000
Tuthill-Anselmo fine sandy loams, 5 to 9 percent slopes	TnC	8661	352763	cv2g	sd007	2004	1:20000
Holt-Tuthill fine sandy loams, 5 to 9 percent slopes	HtC	4403	352742	cv1s	sd007	2004	1:20000
Holt-Tuthill fine sandy loams, 0 to 5 percent slopes	HtB	1981	352741	cv1r	sd007	2004	1:20000
Tuthill-Woodly fine sandy loams, 3 to 6 percent slopes	TwB	8450	353451	cvsn	sd095	1971	1:20000
Manter-Tuthill fine sandy loams, 6 to 9 percent slopes	MfC	6983	353397	cvqx	sd095	1971	1:20000
Tuthill fine sandy loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes	ThB	5095	353447	cvsj	sd095	1971	1:20000
Tuthill-Opal complex, 2 to 9 percent slopes	ToC	3231	353448	cvsk	sd095	1971	1:20000
Opal-Tuthill complex, 5 to 15 percent slopes	OtD	3029	353421	cvrp	sd095	1971	1:20000
Tuthill and Whitelake fine sandy loams, 0 to 5 percent slopes	TuB	2547	353449	cvsl	sd095	1971	1:20000
Opal-Tuthill complex, 2 to 5 percent slopes	OtB	2069	353420	cvrn	sd095	1971	1:20000
Tuthill-Woodly fine sandy loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes	TwA	1475	353450	cvsm	sd095	1971	1:20000
Tuthill-Anselmo fine sandy loams, 3 to 9 percent slopes	TnC	18130	353042	cvcg	sd121	1967	1:31680
Tuthill silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes	ThA	14166	353039	cvcc	sd121	1967	1:31680
Richfield-Tuthill silt loams, 2 to 9 percent slopes	RhB	12544	353029	cvc1	sd121	1967	1:31680
Tuthill silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes	ThB	8622	353040	cvcd	sd121	1967	1:31680
Tuthill silt loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes	ThC	5373	353041	cvcf	sd121	1967	1:31680
Tuthill-Longpine fine sandy loams, 3 to 9 percent slopes	TtC	3655	353043	cvch	sd121	1967	1:31680
Anselmo-Tuthill fine sandy loams, 9 to 21 percent slopes	AuE	3074	352976	cv9b	sd121	1967	1:31680
Tuthill-Wortman fine sandy loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes	TwA	2517	353045	cvck	sd121	1967	1:31680
Tuthill-Vetal fine sandy loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes	TvA	2513	353044	cvcj	sd121	1967	1:31680
Tuthill-Jayem fine sandy loams, 3 to 9 percent slopes	U740C	4	2582935	2pd6c	sd606	2011	1:24000
Tuthill-Anselmo fine sandy loams, 3 to 9 percent slopes	TnC	21415	2925512	2t351	sd610	1965	1:20000
Tuthill-Manter fine sandy loams, 3 to 5 percent slopes	TuB	15949	2925496	2tvtz	sd610	1965	1:20000
Tuthill-Manter fine sandy loams, 5 to 9 percent slopes	TuC	11479	2925532	2tvv0	sd610	1965	1:20000
Tuthill-Manter fine sandy loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes	TuA	3874	2925489	2tvty	sd610	1965	1:20000
Tuthill-Anselmo fine sandy loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes	TnA	2294	2925504	2t350	sd610	1965	1:20000
Manter, cool-Tuthill fine sandy loams, 3 to 6 percent slopes	U745B	2171	2485469	2pfbf	sd612	2011	1:20000
Savo-Tuthill silt loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes	U615A	2127	2485428	2pf93	sd612	2011	1:20000
Manter, cool-Tuthill fine sandy loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes	U745A	1986	2485468	2pfbd	sd612	2011	1:20000
Tuthill-Jayem fine sandy loams, 3 to 9 percent slopes	U740C	1837	2484382	2pd6c	sd612	2011	1:20000
Manter, cool-Tuthill fine sandy loams, 6 to 9 percent slopes	U745C	528	2485470	2pfbg	sd612	2011	1:20000
Tuthill-Jayem fine sandy loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes	U740A	268	2484380	2pd69	sd612	2011	1:20000
Tuthill-Anselmo fine sandy loams, 3 to 9 percent slopes	TnC	9179	2582739	2t351	sd613	2011	1:24000
Savo-Tuthill silt loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes	U615A	6877	2582852	2pf93	sd613	2011	1:24000
Tuthill-Manter fine sandy loams, 3 to 5 percent slopes	TuB	5734	2582741	2tvtz	sd613	2011	1:24000
Tuthill-Manter fine sandy loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes	TuA	3880	2582740	2tvty	sd613	2011	1:24000
Tuthill-Manter fine sandy loams, 5 to 9 percent slopes	TuC	3390	2582742	2tvv0	sd613	2011	1:24000
Tuthill-Jayem fine sandy loams, 3 to 9 percent slopes	U740C	1469	2582849	2pd6c	sd613	2011	1:24000
Tuthill-Anselmo fine sandy loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes	TnA	1183	2582738	2t350	sd613	2011	1:24000
Manter, cool-Tuthill fine sandy loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes	U745A	1073	2582853	2pfbd	sd613	2011	1:24000
Manter, cool-Tuthill fine sandy loams, 3 to 6 percent slopes	U745B	1064	2582854	2pfbf	sd613	2011	1:24000
Tuthill-Jayem fine sandy loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes	U740A	162	2582848	2pd69	sd613	2011	1:24000
Manter, cool-Tuthill fine sandy loams, 6 to 9 percent slopes	U745C	71	2582855	2pfbg	sd613	2011	1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the TUTHILL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2023-10-04).