Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the TUNIS soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of TUNIS, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to TUNIS were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the TUNIS soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the TUNIS series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TUNIS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TUNIS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with TUNIS share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TUNIS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TUNIS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with TUNIS, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing TUNIS as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Walong-Tunis-Rock outcrop association, 30 to 60 percent slopes271nk5022181272dg4hca66019771:24000
Arujo-Walong-Tunis association, 9 to 30 percent slopes26426791467356hpb0ca66820071:24000
Tweedy-Tunis-Rankor association, 30 to 75 percent slopes29524414467386hpbzca66820071:24000
Arujo-Walong-Tunis association, 30 to 75 percent slopes29622587467387hpc0ca66820071:24000
Tunis-Tollhouse-Sorrell association, 30 to 75 percent slopes26814394467360hpb4ca66820071:24000
Walong-Tunis-Rock outcrop association, 30 to 60 percent slopes27112344467363hpb7ca66820071:24000
Tunis-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes2661524467358hpb2ca66820071:24000
Tunis-Walong complex, 50 to 75 percent slopes18818802463892hkq8ca67019771:24000
Arujo-Friant-Tunis complex, 50 to 75 percent slopes1087737463812hkmpca67019771:24000
Arujo-Friant-Tunis complex, 15 to 50 percent slopes1074766463811hkmnca67019771:24000
Tunis sandy loam, 5 to 30 percent slopes1871433463891hkq7ca67019771:24000
Arujo-Walong-Tunis association, 30 to 75 percent slopes296ne117222181062dg3tca67019771:24000
Tunis-Tollhouse-Sorrell association, 30 to 75 percent slopes268ne31622180962dg3hca67019771:24000
Arujo-Friant-Tunis, 9 to 15 percent slopes106307463810hkmmca67019771:24000
Arujo-Walong-Tunis association, 9 to 30 percent slopes264ne28122180942dg3fca67019771:24000
Walong-Tunis-Rock outcrop association, 30 to 60 percent slopes271ne19322180982dg3kca67019771:24000
Tunis-Walong complex, 50 to 75 percent slopes188293739347stbxca67519681:24000
Tweedy-Tunis-Rankor association, 30 to 75 percent slopes295ne332623710402kl85ca76019811:24000
Arujo-Walong-Tunis association, 9 to 30 percent slopes264ne151723710212kl7kca76019811:24000
Tunis-Tollhouse-Sorrell association, 30 to 75 percent slopes268ne133223710232kl7mca76019811:24000
Arujo-Walong-Tunis association, 30 to 75 percent slopes296ne97723710412kl86ca76019811:24000
Walong-Tunis-Rock outcrop association, 30 to 60 percent slopes271ne51923710262kl7qca76019811:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the TUNIS soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .