Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the TULLER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of TULLER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to TULLER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the TULLER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the TULLER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TULLER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TULLER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with TULLER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TULLER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TULLER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with TULLER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. NY-2012-02-15-01 | Albany County - June 1992

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Wellsboro-Lackawanna-Morris unit (Soil Survey of Albany County, New York; June 1992).

  2. NY-2012-02-15-02 | Albany County - June 1992

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Lordstown-Kearsarge-Arnot unit (Soil Survey of Albany County, New York; June 1992).

  3. NY-2012-02-15-06 | Cayuga County - 1971

    Typical cross section of Langford-Erie association and Langford-Howard association in the southeastern part of the county (Soil Survey of Cayuga County, New York; 1971).

  4. NY-2012-02-15-48 | Tompkins County - July 1965

    Typical cross section of southern Tompkins County soils, consisting mainly of low-lime and very low-lime soils with a fragipan (Soil Survey of Tompkins County, New York; July 1965).

  5. NY-2012-02-16-04 | Wyoming County - April 1974

    Typical pattern of soils in association 10 (Soil Survey of Wyoming County, New York; April 1974).

Map Units

Map units containing TULLER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Tuller-Greene complex, 0 to 8 percent slopesTuB62452887939phxny00119851:15840
Morris and Tuller soils, 3 to 25 percent slopes, very stonyMuD9622892032vxcsny00719661:15840
Tuller channery silt loam, 0 to 25 percent slopesTuD5662892109pycny00719661:15840
Tuller channery silt loam, 1 to 8 percent slopesTuB3622895009q7qny01119681:15840
Tuller channery silt loam, 0 to 8 percent slopesTuB2982899499qq6ny01519691:20000
Tuller channery silt loamTu16492900419qt5ny01719821:15840
Tuller silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, cool phase73B87027608312srf2ny02320141:12000
Tuller silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes76B44227231022rwcsny02320141:12000
Tuller channery silt loamTs21112917169sk6ny03919851:24000
Tuller channery silt loam, very stonyTt7882917179sk7ny03919851:24000
Tuller silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, loamyKcA13022677723bmlpny04920181:24000
Tuller silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, loamyKcB512677724bmlqny04920181:24000
Tuller channery silt loam, 0 to 8 percent slopesTuB13752926399thzny05319751:15840
Tuller channery silt loamTu9702928919ts3ny05719731:24000
Tuller-Brockport complex, 0 to 3 percent slopesTvA82928929ts4ny05719731:24000
Tuller-Brockport complex, 3 to 8 percent slopesTvB52928939ts5ny05719731:24000
Greene-Tuller complex2693772933919v97ny06519931:24000
Greene-Tuller complex, 1 to 8 percent slopesGrB28632942139w4rny07719931:24000
Tuller-Brockport complex, 0 to 3 percent slopesTvA4295309657bd6yny09319731:15840
Tuller channery silt loamTu2227309656bd6xny09319731:15840
Tuller-Brockport complex, 3 to 8 percent slopesTvB2014309658bd6zny09319731:15840
Tuller and Allis silt loams, 0 to 8 percent slopesTaB67852945519whnny09519651:15840
Tuller and Allis silt loams, 8 to 15 percent slopesTaC2242945529whpny09519651:15840
Tuller channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesTuB4692946569wm1ny09719761:15840
Tuller channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesTuC3232946579wm2ny09719761:15840
Tuller channery silt loam, 0 to 6 percent slopesTuB35622948549wtfny10119721:15840
Tuller channery silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopesTuC6992948559wtgny10119721:15840
Tuller-Rock outcrop complex, 1 to 5 percent slopesTeB5072951369x3jny10519841:15840
Lordstown, Tuller, and Ovid soils, shallow and very shallow, 0 to 15 percent slopesLtB12222956529xn5ny10919631:20000
Tuller channery silt loam, 0 to 6 percent slopesTeA8962956829xp4ny10919631:20000
Lordstown, Tuller, and Ovid soils, shallow and very shallow, 15 to 35 percent slopesLtC6872956539xn6ny10919631:20000
Morris-Tuller complex, gently sloping, very boulderyMTB38622955062vxd2ny11119741:15840
Tuller channery silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesTuA18462954289xdyny12119691:20000
Tuller channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesTuB6132954299xdzny12119691:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the TULLER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .