Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the TUFFO soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of TUFFO, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to TUFFO were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the TUFFO soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the TUFFO series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TUFFO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TUFFO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with TUFFO share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TUFFO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TUFFO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with TUFFO, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing TUFFO as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Chalco-Saraph-Tuffo association34224243103468313qnwca68520061:24000
Saraph-Macnot-Tuffo association55315571103465313qmxca68520061:24000
Saraph-Nosavvy-Tuffo association5547071103460013ql6ca68520061:24000
Saraph-Tuffo-Old Camp association5566614103469913qpdca68520061:24000
Saraph-Tuffo-Yellowhills association5572931103474813qqzca68520061:24000
Saraph-Hangrock-Tuffo association552728103474713qqyca68520061:24000
Fulstone-Saraph-Tuffo association406244103477313qrsca68520061:24000
Saraph-Hangrock-Tuffo association115030450474495hxr9nv75919951:24000
Fulstone-Saraph-Tuffo association14105460474589hxvbnv75919951:24000
Saraph-Tuffo-Yellowhills association115170474496hxrbnv75919951:24000
Saraph-Tuffo-Yellowhills association8419804474819hy2rnv76019941:24000
Anawalt-Devada-Tuffo complex1048576474658hxxknv76019941:24000
Saraph-Hangrock-Tuffo association11506578474672hxy0nv76019941:24000
Frentera-Wylo-Tuffo association4702609474752hy0lnv76019941:24000
Tuffo-Wylo-Frentera association4802386474754hy0nnv76019941:24000
Devada-Ninemile-Tuffo association1821367474702hxyznv76019941:24000
Gumble-Tuffo-Rock outcrop association18535433477133j0hdnv76319861:24000
Gumble-Tuffo-Hunnton association18524150477132j0hcnv76319861:24000
Tuffo-Yuko-Tuffo, moderately steep association91213986479017j2g5nv76719861:24000
Yuko-Tuffo-Yuko, moderately steep association mlra 25763134154789972wbkmnv76719861:24000
Yuko-Tuffo-Upsteer association76413067478998j2fknv76719861:24000
Wieland-Tuffo-Chiara association12743695478737j254nv76719861:24000
Tuffo-Yuko-Vanwyper association9133657479018j2g6nv76719861:24000
Gochea-Gochea, gravelly-Tuffo association7722838479001j2fnnv76719861:24000
Yuko-Tuffo-Quarz association7602453478994j2ffnv76719861:24000
Yuko-Tuffo-Bregar association7611910478995j2fgnv76719861:24000
Vining-Tuffo complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes34115574490770jgp9or62819971:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the TUFFO soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .