Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the TOPDECK soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of TOPDECK, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to TOPDECK were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
2005N0107S2004CA083007Topdeck2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties33.9900017,-119.680336

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the TOPDECK soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the TOPDECK series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TOPDECK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TOPDECK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with TOPDECK share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TOPDECK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TOPDECK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with TOPDECK, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. CA-2012-04-20-01 | Channel Islands National Park - 2007

    Looking northeast on Santa Cruz Island. The Santa Cruz Island fault runs east along Canada Christy. The various kinds of parent material are depicted (Soil Survey of Channel Islands National Park, California; 2007).

Map Units

Map units containing TOPDECK as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Urban land-Typic Xerorthents, very gravelly-Topdeck complex, 10 to 35 percent slopes1259136030598032xgtzca67419681:24000
Topdeck loam, 10 to 35 percent slopes11599954577042y8svca67419681:24000
Rock outcrop-Spinnaker-Topdeck complex, 30 to 80 percent slopes291108341020174137kvca68820081:24000
Fiale-Tongva-Topdeck association, 15 to 60 percent slopes1002786697331rdmkca68820081:24000
Fiale-Topdeck-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 75 percent slopes103275114526151krkkca68820081:24000
Fiale-Topdeck association, 2 to 8 percent slopes10214051019368136qvca68820081:24000
Halyard-Topdeck-Tongva complex, 15 to 75 percent slopes1501180697326rdmdca68820081:24000
Topdeck-Rock outcrop-Spinnaker complex, 30 to 75 percent slopes2708801020170137kqca68820081:24000
Halyard-Topdeck association, 4 to 15 percent slopes1537841019372136qzca68820081:24000
Topdeck-Spinnaker-Tongva complex 30 to 75 percent slopes2716771020171137krca68820081:24000
Topdeck-Starboard-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 75 percent slopes2725881020172137ksca68820081:24000
Rock outcrop-Topdeck-Spinnaker complex, 30 to 75 percent slopes86157416744431t6d9ca68820081:24000
Topdeck, overblown-Typic Durixerolls, loamy subsoil complex, 9 to 30 percent slopes27354714526121krkgca68820081:24000
Rock outcrop-Topdeck-Starboard complex, 30 to 80 percent slopes2904511020173137ktca68820081:24000
Topdeck-Halyard association, 4 to 15 percent slopes86016616744421t6d8ca68820081:24000
Mollic Haploxeralfs, coastal-Topdeck-Urban land complex, 20 to 55 percent slopes117738529116392w61xca69620161:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the TOPDECK soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .