Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the TIPTON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of TIPTON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to TIPTON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
78B80-OK-29-14S1980OK057014Tipton4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties34.6726667,-99.9793889
78B98P0552S1998OK065002Tipton7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties34.5076675,-99.4113617
78C04N1067S2004OK141001Tipton7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties34.458416,-99.1368866

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the TIPTON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the TIPTON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TIPTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TIPTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with TIPTON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TIPTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TIPTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with TIPTON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. OK-2012-02-16-21 | Cotton County - December 1963

    Typical pattern of Pratt, Tivoli, and associated soils (Soil Survey of Cotton County, Oklahoma; December 1963).

  2. OK-2012-02-16-27 | Dewey County - December 1963

    Typical pattern of most of the soils in association 5 (Soil Survey of Dewey County, Oklahoma; December 1963).

  3. OK-2012-02-16-28 | Ellis County - April 1966

    Major soils of associations 1, 2, 3, and 11 (Soil Survey of Ellis County, Oklahoma; April 1966).

  4. OK-2012-02-16-37 | Greer County - March 1967

    Major soils in soil associations 3, 7, and 9, and their relation to the landscape (Soil Survey of Greer County, Oklahoma; March 1967).

  5. OK-2012-02-16-41 | Harmon County - September 1984

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Tipton-Westview-Altus map unit (Soil Survey of Harmon County, Oklahoma; September 1984).

  6. OK-2012-02-16-52 | Jackson County - June 1961

    Typical pattern of Miles, Enterprise, Tivoli, and associated soil (Soil Survey of Jackson County, Oklahoma; June 1961).

  7. TX-2012-03-21-34 | Lipscomb County - December 1975

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in association 1 (Soil Survey of Lipscomb County, TX; 1975).

  8. TX-2012-03-21-37 | Lipscomb County - December 1975

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in association 4 (Soil Survey of Lipscomb County, TX; 1975).

  9. TX-2012-03-22-07 | Wheeler County - October 1975

    Relationship of soils in the Abilene-Mobeetie-Berda association to parent material and relief (Soil Survey of Wheeler County, TX; 1975).

  10. TX-2012-03-22-09 | Wilbarger County - September 1962

    Block diagram showing the geographical association of the soils on the low terraces along the Pease River. Sandy alluvial land and Yahola very fine sandy loam, which formed in recent alluvium, are in soil association 6. Miles fine sandy loam, which is in soil association 3; Enterprise very fine sandy loam; and Tipton silt loam formed in sandy outwash that has been reworked by wind in some places (Soil Survey of Wilbarger County, TX; 1962).

Map Units

Map units containing TIPTON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Tipton loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes5632823816952t6p5ok00919781:24000
Tipton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes5517603816942t6p4ok00919781:24000
Tipton loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesTpB35543822502t6p5ok03319611:24000
Tipton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesTpA28133822492t6p4ok03319611:24000
Tipton silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesTpA2228382402307s9ok04319611:24000
Tipton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesTipA78253943572t6p4ok05520051:24000
Tipton fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesTpfA38726481862t6p7ok05520051:24000
Tipton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes5785549754922t6p4ok05719821:24000
Tipton fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesTpfA47749754842t6p7ok05719821:24000
Tipton loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesTipB12039754932t6p5ok05719821:24000
Tipton loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesTipB19343830342t6p5ok05919981:24000
Tipton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesTipA7173830332t6p4ok05919981:24000
Tipton loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesTipC266383036dvl0ok05919981:24000
Tipton loam, 5 to 8 percent slopesTipD72383037dvl1ok05919981:24000
Tipton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesTipA174503923922t6p4ok06520001:24000
Tipton fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesTpfA63523924062t6p7ok06520001:24000
Tipton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesTtA339863849802t6p4ok14119681:24000
Tipton fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesTpA280823849782t6p7ok14119681:24000
Tipton fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesTpB5785384979dxlpok14119681:24000
Tipton loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesTtB54803849812t6p5ok14119681:24000
Tipton loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesMmB194733638312t6p5tx07519611:20000
Tipton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesMmA75893638302t6p4tx07519611:20000
Tipton fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesMfA29193638252t6p7tx07519611:20000
Tipton loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes504603638912t6p5tx07719771:24000
Tipton loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesTpB182231092332t6p5tx08719651:20000
Tipton fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesTfA175531092312t6p7tx08719651:20000
Tipton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesTpA27131092322t6p4tx08719651:20000
Tipton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesTpA180831561752t6p4tx15520211:24000
Tipton loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesAfB54203671212t6p5tx19719651:20000
Tipton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesTp26663671682t6p4tx19719651:20000
Tipton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesTtA2473367532dbfwtx20719601:20000
Tipton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesTpA2754372310dhf0tx43319701:24000
Tipton loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesMoB106433733742t6p5tx48519721:20000
Tipton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesToA40653733892t6p4tx48519721:20000
Tipton-Urban land complexTu701373390djjvtx48519721:20000
Tipton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesTpA81053734482t6p4tx48719601:20000
Tipton loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesTpB24003734492t6p5tx48719601:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the TIPTON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .