Soil Data Explorer - TINSLEY

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the TINSLEY soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of TINSLEY, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to TINSLEY were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the TINSLEY soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the TINSLEY series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-02-21), parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the TINSLEY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the TINSLEY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with TINSLEY share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the TINSLEY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TINSLEY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with TINSLEY, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing TINSLEY as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Tinsley gravelly sandy loam, 8 to 35 percent slopes	12E	31177	343309	cj7h	mt017	1995	1:24000
Tinsley-Delpoint-Cabbart complex, 8 to 45 percent slope	123F	7224	343308	cj7g	mt017	1995	1:24000
Kremlin-Tinsley-Degrand complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes	121D	1488	343305	cj7c	mt017	1995	1:24000
Tinsley-Chanta complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes	122D	1093	343306	cj7d	mt017	1995	1:24000
Tinsley-Cabbart complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes	665F	407	343634	cjkz	mt017	1995	1:24000
Lihill-Tinsley complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes	990E	27	343828	cjs7	mt017	1995	1:24000
Tinsley very gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes	949E	27	343780	cjqp	mt017	1995	1:24000
Tinsley-Lambert complex, 15 to 65 percent slopes	Tg	74625	342045	cgxq	mt021	1971	1:24000
Tinsley soils, 15 to 65 percent slopes	Tm	11957	342046	cgxr	mt021	1971	1:24000
Tinsley sandy loam, 4 to 15 percent slopes	97D	194	342718	chmf	mt033	2002	1:24000
Tinsley-Armells-Yamacall complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes	176F	47	360658	d394	mt033	2002	1:24000
Attewan-Tinsley complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes	272C	2988	343890	cjv7	mt041	1994	1:24000
Beaverell-Tinsley complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes	271D	1618	344163	ck41	mt051	1992	1:24000
Tinsley gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 70 percent slopes	77F	410	344263	ck78	mt051	1992	1:24000
Tinsley gravelly sandy loam, 4 to 15 percent slopes	77D	407	344262	ck77	mt051	1992	1:24000
Attewan-Tinsley complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes	272C	258	344164	ck42	mt051	1992	1:24000
Tinsley-Delpoint-Cabbart complex, 8 to 45 percent slopes	122	11198	344801	cksm	mt079	1986	1:24000
Chinook-Tinsley complex, 4 to 25 percent slopes	36	2704	344891	ckwj	mt079	1986	1:24000
Lihill-Tinsley complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes	82	2678	345026	cl0w	mt079	1986	1:24000
Tinsley gravelly sandy loam, 4 to 45 percent slopes	160	682	2451204	2n8p3	mt079	1986	1:24000
Kremlin-Tinsley-Degrand complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes	79	622	345015	cl0j	mt079	1986	1:24000
Chinook-Tinsley-Degrand complex, 4 to 25 percent slopes	153	168	2451197	2n8nw	mt079	1986	1:24000
Tinsley soils, 15 to 65 percent slopes	TeF	25343	345367	clcw	mt083	1973	1:24000
Tinsley gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes	77C	1700	345274	cl8w	mt101	1992	1:24000
Tinsley gravelly sandy loam, 8 to 25 percent slopes	77E	510	345275	cl8x	mt101	1992	1:24000
Evanston-Tinsley complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes	373C	285	345144	cl4p	mt101	1992	1:24000
Tinsley complex, 9 to 35 percent slopes	70	30894	345590	clm2	mt105	1976	1:24000
Tinsley-Reeder-Doney complex, 9 to 35 percent slopes	71	22580	345591	clm3	mt105	1976	1:24000
Farnuf-Tinsley-Reeder association, hilly	20	6546	345535	clk9	mt105	1976	1:24000
Tinsley soils	TN	3209	146941	4xx1	mt600	1969	1:24000
Terrace escarpments, gravelly	TCa	15655	346168	cm6q	mt607	1970	1:24000
Colby association, rolling	CX	3918	345900	cly2	mt607	1970	1:24000
Attewan-Tinsley complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes	272C	5588	346657	cmqh	mt615	1992	1:24000
Tinsley gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes	77F	1764	346921	cn00	mt615	1992	1:24000
Neldore-Cabbart-Tinsley complex, 25 to 65 percent slopes	971F	17856	347823	cny3	mt641	1994	1:24000
Beaverell-Tinsley complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes	270E	2648	347654	cnrn	mt641	1994	1:24000
Tinsley-Armells-Yamac complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes	176	13438	348004	cp3y	mt649	1985	1:24000
Tinsley-Cabbart complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes	177	7761	348005	cp3z	mt649	1985	1:24000
Tinsley very gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes	175	3943	348003	cp3x	mt649	1985	1:24000
Zahill-Tinsley complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes	76	73428	348284	cpdz	mt661	1982	1:24000
Wabek-Cabba-Tinsley complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes	66	27081	348273	cpdm	mt661	1982	1:24000
Zahill-Tinsley complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes	75	20739	348283	cpdy	mt661	1982	1:24000
Wabek-Tinsley complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes	67	16923	348274	cpdn	mt661	1982	1:24000
Hillon-Tinsley complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes	33	6959	348237	cpcg	mt661	1982	1:24000
Tinsley very gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes	53	5241	348259	cpd5	mt661	1982	1:24000
Hillon-Tinsley complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes	32	3052	348236	cpcf	mt661	1982	1:24000
Tinsley-Chanta complex, 6 to 35 percent slopes	L4567F	2978	2707088	2q38n	nd007	1998	1:24000
Tinsley-Chanta complex, 6 to 35 percent slopes	L4567F	1217	2563507	2q38n	nd011	1969	1:20000
Tinsley-Chanta complex, 6 to 35 percent slopes	L4567F	1406	2707352	2q38n	nd033	1985	1:24000
Tinsley-Chanta complex, 6 to 35 percent slopes	L4567F	3757	2715177	2q38n	nd053	2003	1:24000
Tinsley-Chanta complex, 6 to 35 percent slopes	L4567F	4335	2715960	2q38n	nd087	1974	1:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the TINSLEY soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2023-10-04).