Soil Data Explorer - TINDAHAY

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the TINDAHAY soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of TINDAHAY, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to TINDAHAY were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
n/a	40A1062	S1962ID077013	Tindahay	5	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the TINDAHAY soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the TINDAHAY series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the TINDAHAY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the TINDAHAY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with TINDAHAY share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the TINDAHAY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the TINDAHAY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with TINDAHAY, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing TINDAHAY as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Tindahay fine sandy loam, 4 to 8 percent slopes	180	1205	2519133	2q8d	id001	2012	1:24000
Tindahay gravelly loam, 8 to 12 percent slopes	181	1149	2519134	2q8f	id001	2012	1:24000
Tindahay fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	178	1134	2519131	2q89	id001	2012	1:24000
Tindahay fine sandy loam, 2 to 4 percent slopes	179	296	2519132	2q8b	id001	2012	1:24000
Tindahay-Cashmere complex, 8 to 12 percent slopes	198	1053	81204	2qhh	id656	1992	1:24000
Tindahay-Cashmere complex, 4 to 8 percent slopes	197	855	81203	2qhg	id656	1992	1:24000
Tindahay-Cashmere complex, 2 to 4 percent slopes	196	619	81202	2qhf	id656	1992	1:24000
Tindahay-Cashmere complex, 7 to 12 percent slopes	TmD	2383	81399	2qps	id659	1971	1:20000
Tindahay coarse sandy loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes	TlD	663	81398	2qpr	id659	1971	1:20000
Tindahay loamy coarse sand, 12 to 30 percent slopes	ThE	510	81396	2qpp	id659	1971	1:20000
Tindahay coarse sandy loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes	TlC	456	81397	2qpq	id659	1971	1:20000
Hardtrigger-Briabbit-Tindahay complex, 1 to 15 percent slopes	69	23528	486250	j9zh	id675	1992	1:24000
Escalante-Tindahay-Ornea complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes	55	15005	486220	j9yj	id675	1992	1:24000
Tindahay-Royal-Badland complex, 1 to 90 percent slopes	178	10606	486057	j9s8	id675	1992	1:24000
Tindahay sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes	42	7319	80099	2pbv	id702	1999	1:24000
Tindahay loamy sand, 0 to 1 percent slopes	41	5499	80098	2pbt	id702	1999	1:24000
Tindahay loamy coarse sand, 2 to 4 percent slopes	ThB	15329	82833	2s61	id710	1968	1:24000
Tindahay loamy coarse sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes	ThA	4863	82832	2s60	id710	1968	1:24000
Tindahay loamy sand, undulating	TNF	3537	82830	2s5y	id710	1968	1:24000
Tindahay loamy coarse sand, 4 to 8 percent slopes	ThC	2033	82834	2s62	id710	1968	1:24000
Tindahay loamy coarse sand, 12 to 20 percent slopes	ThE	305	82835	2s63	id710	1968	1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the TINDAHAY soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).