Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the TIMPIE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of TIMPIE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to TIMPIE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the TIMPIE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the TIMPIE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TIMPIE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TIMPIE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with TIMPIE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TIMPIE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TIMPIE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with TIMPIE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. UT-2010-11-05-02 | Tooele County Area - 2000

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Tooele-Cliffdown-Timpie general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Tooele County Area, Utah; 2000).

  2. UT-2012-03-22-13 | Tooele Area - 2000

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Tooele-Cliffdown-Timpie general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Tooele Area, Utah; Tooele County and Parts of Box Elder, Davis, and Juab Counties, Utah, and Parts of White Pine and Elko Counties, Nevada; 2000).

Map Units

Map units containing TIMPIE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Katelana-Ragtown-Timpie association84536903478491j1x6nv76619941:24000
Katelana-Timpie association84210297478489j1x4nv76619941:24000
Timpie-Piltdown-Linoyer association3737140478313j1qgnv76619941:24000
Timpie-Kunzler-Threesee association14716438478647j227nv76619941:24000
Toano-Timpie association15602201478661j22pnv76619941:24000
Sondoa-Timpie association31308929480009j3h5nv77920041:24000
Sycomat-Escalante-Timpie association31741215480013j3h9nv77920041:24000
Timpie silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes6695795482176j5r2ut61119921:24000
Timpie silt loam, saline, 0 to 4 percent slopes6757846482177j5r3ut61119921:24000
Timpie-Tooele complex, saline, 0 to 5 percent slopes6820837482178j5r4ut61119921:24000
Sondoa-Timpie association8265313897151hn3jut61119921:24000
Sycomat-Escalante-Timpie association8321513897161hn3kut61119921:24000
Timpie silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes82170231839112x4h9ut6171:24000
Timpie fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes1133702481790j5bmut61819951:24000
Timpie-Uvada complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes114551481791j5bnut61819951:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the TIMPIE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .