Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the THIRSTYGULCH soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of THIRSTYGULCH, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to THIRSTYGULCH were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
43C99P0590S1999OR059001THIRSTYGULCH5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties45.1823654,-118.720192

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the THIRSTYGULCH soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the THIRSTYGULCH series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the THIRSTYGULCH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the THIRSTYGULCH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with THIRSTYGULCH share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the THIRSTYGULCH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the THIRSTYGULCH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with THIRSTYGULCH, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing THIRSTYGULCH as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Pinuscreek-Rebarrow-Thirstygulch complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4117CO14825938841r0f2or60419881:24000
Klicker-Thirstygulch-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes4123AO13125938891r0f8or60419881:24000
Webbgulch-Thirstygulch-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4122CO66259388823bp9or60419881:24000
Tolo-Thirstygulch-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes4125AO5125938911r0f9or60419881:24000
Syrupcreek-Thirstygulch complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes5759BO189031205391r1hkor60720181:24000
Thirstygulch-Webbgulch complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes5825BO1031205511r1pzor60720181:24000
Webbgulch-Thirstygulch-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes4122AO4168433853652r5m2or62620181:24000
Webbgulch-Thirstygulch-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes4122BO2742133853661r0f7or62620181:24000
Thirstygulch-Anatone-Webbgulch complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes4200AO2549133853752ptgvor62620181:24000
Webbgulch-Thirstygulch-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4122CO14835338528223bp9or62620181:24000
Thirstygulch-Anatone-Webbgulch complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes4200BO1301031222941r0zmor62620181:24000
Thirstygulch-Anatone-Webbgulch complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4200CO794931221241q71hor62620181:24000
Klicker-Thirstygulch-Anatone complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes4123BO257233853702l5fkor62620181:24000
Klicker-Thirstygulch-Anatone complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4123CO104833853712l5qbor62620181:24000
Klicker-Thirstygulch-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes4123AO54033853691r0f8or62620181:24000
Webbgulch-Thirstygulch-Rock outcrop complex, 60 to 90 percent slopes4122DO37733853672r5m3or62620181:24000
Webbgulch-Thirstygulch-Rock Outcrop complex, landslide, 0 to 30 percent slopes4122NL10233853682tz18or62620181:24000
Thirstygulch-Webbgulch-Anatone complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4200CO110734295372m7flor6271:24000
Thirstygulch-Anatone-Webbgulch complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes4200BO35134319161r0zmor6271:24000
Pinuscreek-Rebarrow-Thirstygulch complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4117CO1230424371691r0f2or63120181:24000
Webbgulch-Thirstygulch-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4122CO2878248681523bp9or63120181:24000
Thirstygulch-Flycreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes3315CO207224866421r01vor63120181:24000
Klicker-Thirstygulch-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes4123AO189824868161r0f8or63120181:24000
Tolo-Thirstygulch-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes4125AO132924868181r0f9or63120181:24000
Syrupcreek-Thirstygulch complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes5759BO93124372891r1hkor63120181:24000
Webbgulch-Thirstygulch-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes4122BO73524868141r0f7or63120181:24000
Downeygulch-Thirstygulch complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes5790BO6882437318nj1cor63120181:24000
Thirstygulch-Webbgulch complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes5825BO26124375731r1pzor63120181:24000
Thirstygulch very stony ashy loam, 30 to 60 percent slopes5826CO17924375741r1q0or63120181:24000
Klicker-Thirstygulch-Anatone complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes4123BO16924371722l5fkor63120181:24000
Klicker-Thirstygulch-Anatone complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4123CO9024371732l5qbor63120181:24000
Syrupcreek-Thirstygulch complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes5759BO29131214661r1hkor66719841:20000
Klicker-Thirstygulch-Anatone complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes1661629844642twnor67019991:24000
Klicker-Thirstygulch-Anatone complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes165606844632twmor67019991:24000
Downeygulch-Thirstygulch complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes70586847962v7cor67019991:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the THIRSTYGULCH soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .