Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the TENRAG soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of TENRAG, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to TENRAG were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the TENRAG soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the TENRAG series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the sibling sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TENRAG series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TENRAG series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with TENRAG share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the competing sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TENRAG series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TENRAG series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with TENRAG, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing TENRAG as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Garlet family-Rock outcrop-Tenrag family, complex, cirque headwalls213Vr409202403625y5hid75819981:24000
Yellowmule-Garlet-Swifton families, complex, landslide deposits704S132751487644zsvmt60520071:24000
Elkner-Tenrag-Garlet families, complex, gentle mountain slopes522S112761486044zmpmt60520071:24000
Garlet-Yellowmule-Tenrag families, complex, moderately steep mountain slopes534S105891486514zp6mt60520071:24000
Garlet-Swifton-Tenrag families, complex, gentle mountain slopes524S54081486104zmwmt60520071:24000
Garlet-Tenrag families, complex, moderately steep mountain slopes532S42701486404znvmt60520071:24000
Garlet-Tenrag-Relyea families, complex, glacial moraines342S385414933450d7mt60520071:24000
Garlet family-Rock outcrop-Tenrag family, complex, cirque headwalls213Vr379414933350d6mt60520071:24000
Garlet-Relyea-Tenrag families, complex, steep mountain slopes544S35791488904zxxmt60520071:24000
Swifton-Garlet-Tenrag families, complex, glacial moraines344S26851485804zlxmt60520071:24000
Garlet-Tenrag families-Rock outcrop complex, steep mountain slopes544Sr22041488894zxwmt60520071:24000
Garlet-Tenrag-Yellowmule families, complex, glacial moraines343S219914933150d4mt60520071:24000
Garlet-Relyea-Tenrag families, complex, moderately steep mountain slopes533S207614929850c2mt60520071:24000
Garlet-Tenrag-Tibson families, complex, cirque basins254S1937148971500jmt60520071:24000
Garlet-Tenrag families-Rock outcrop complex, cold, moderately steep mountain slopes534Vr18521489605005mt60520071:24000
Garlet-Yellowmule-Tenrag families, complex, landslide deposits704V9131488404zw9mt60520071:24000
Tenrag-Swifton-Garlet families, complex, moderately steep mountain slopes532V8901486414znwmt60520071:24000
Garlet-Tenrag families-Rock outcrop complex, moderately steep mountain slopes534Sr8261486524zp7mt60520071:24000
Garlet family-Rock outcrop-Tenrag family, complex, valley trough walls222S7561488064zv6mt60520071:24000
Garlet-Tenrag families, complex, mountain ridgetops102V4631485274zk6mt60520071:24000
Garlet-Yellowmule-Tenrag families, complex, moderately steep mountain slopes534S16625153894zp6mt61220111:24000
Yellowmule-Garlet-Swifton families, complex, landslide deposits704S13225977314zsvmt61220111:24000
Garlet-Relyea-Tenrag families, complex, moderately steep mountain slopes533S48259776950c2mt61220111:24000
Garlet-Swifton-Tenrag families, complex, gentle mountain slopes524S3425153884zmwmt61220111:24000
Garlet-Tenrag families-Rock outcrop complex, cold, moderately steep mountain slopes534Vr2625118265005mt61220111:24000
Garlet-Relyea-Tenrag families, complex, steep mountain slopes544S2325977494zxxmt61220111:24000
Garlet-Tenrag-Relyea families, complex, glacial moraines342S4251183050d7mt61220111:24000
Garlet-Tenrag families-Rock outcrop complex, moderately steep mountain slopes534Sr225118194zp7mt61220111:24000
Garlet-Tenrag-Tibson families, complex, cirque basins3198017101291vdjgmt63619831:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the TENRAG soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .