Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the TEMPLE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of TEMPLE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to TEMPLE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the TEMPLE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the TEMPLE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TEMPLE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TEMPLE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with TEMPLE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TEMPLE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TEMPLE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with TEMPLE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing TEMPLE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Temple loam, overwashed, slightly saline, 0 to 1 percent slopesTcA1229462708hjh2ca64419591:24000
Temple silty clay loam, moderately saline, 0 to 1 percent slopesTkA868462714hjh8ca64419591:24000
Temple silty clay loam, slightly saline, 0 to 1 percent slopesThA551462713hjh7ca64419591:24000
Temple loam, overwashed, 0 to 1 percent slopesTbA301462707hjh1ca64419591:24000
Temple silty clay, slightly saline, 0 to 1 percent slopesTeA271462710hjh4ca64419591:24000
Temple loam, overwashed, moderately saline, 0 to 1 percent slopesTdA181462709hjh3ca64419591:24000
Temple silty clay, moderately saline, 0 to 1 percent slopesTfA178462711hjh5ca64419591:24000
Temple silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesTgA94462712hjh6ca64419591:24000
Temple clay loam, slightly saline, 0 to 1 percent slopesTcA2478463176hjz5ca64819591:20000
Temple loam, slightly saline, 0 to 1 percent slopesTfA2217463179hjz8ca64819591:20000
Temple clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesTbA340463175hjz4ca64819591:20000
Temple clay loam, slightly saline, channeled, 0 to 3 percent slopesTdA255463177hjz6ca64819591:20000
Temple loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesTeA155463178hjz7ca64819591:20000
Temple clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesTbA999463517hkb5ca65119591:20000
Temple clay loam, slightly saline, 0 to 1 percent slopesTcA629463518hkb6ca65119591:20000
Temple clay, 0 to 1 percent slopesTaA265463516hkb4ca65119591:20000
Temple loam, slightly saline, 0 to 1 percent slopesTeA118463520hkb8ca65119591:20000
Temple loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesTdA44463519hkb7ca65119591:20000
Temple clay loamTd6532464468hl9vca65419661:24000
Temple loamTa6368464465hl9rca65419661:24000
Temple loam, saline-alkaliTc2177464467hl9tca65419661:24000
Temple clay loam, saline-alkaliTf1880464470hl9xca65419661:24000
Temple clay loam, salineTe919464469hl9wca65419661:24000
Temple loam, salineTb587464466hl9sca65419661:24000
Temple clayTg309464471hl9yca65419661:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the TEMPLE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .