Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the TARNACH soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of TARNACH, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to TARNACH were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the TARNACH soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the TARNACH series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TARNACH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TARNACH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with TARNACH share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TARNACH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TARNACH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with TARNACH, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing TARNACH as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Wala-Tarnach association9835773478205j1lznv76619941:24000
Tarnach-Wesfil association69123875478431j1v8nv76619941:24000
Tarnach-Upatad-Wesfil association69220976478432j1v9nv76619941:24000
Upatad-Pioche-Tarnach association7404318478449j1vvnv76619941:24000
Wala-Tarnach association102018764479922j3dcnv77920041:24000
Tarnach-Checkett association402013472480109j3ldnv77920041:24000
Tarnach-Ultramont association40239165480112j3lhnv77920041:24000
Tarnach association40318584480115j3llnv77920041:24000
Tarnach-Atlow-Pioche association12108501479946j3f4nv77920041:24000
Stewval-Tarnach association32526582480041j3j6nv77920041:24000
Tarnach-Stewval association40214032480110j3lfnv77920041:24000
Tarnach-Jericho association40013578480107j3lbnv77920041:24000
Tarnach-Kyler-Jericho association32532949480042j3j7nv77920041:24000
Tarnach association, moist40222703480111j3lgnv77920041:24000
Atlow-Tarnach association32502072480040j3j5nv77920041:24000
Tarnach-Poobaa association40241457480113j3ljnv77920041:24000
Tarnach-Bellehelen-Poobaa association40261157480114j3lknv77920041:24000
Declo-Lembos-Tarnach association, 1 to 6 percent slopes2749357481234j4rput60119851:24000
Tarnach-Amtoft very gravelly loams, 15 to 50 percent slopes8924849481302j4twut60119851:24000
Tarnach, moist-Tarnach association, 30 to 70 percent slopes9116921481305j4tzut60119851:24000
Tarnach very gravelly loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes8814017481301j4tvut60119851:24000
Tarnach-Promo complex, 10 to 35 percent slopes903044481304j4tyut60119851:24000
Tarnach gravelly loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes872422481300j4ttut60119851:24000
Tarnach-Checkett association84564713897181hn3mut61119921:24000
Hiko Peak, dry-Tarnach-Rock outcrop association, 4 to 45 percent slopes145495924226892mb08ut6281:24000
Hiko Peak, very stony-Tarnach association, 4 to 45 percent slopes14585425045362r816ut6291:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the TARNACH soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .