Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the TAMARA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of TAMARA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to TAMARA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
43C04N082603OR059001Tamara7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties45.6848183,-118.1065674

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the TAMARA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the TAMARA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TAMARA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TAMARA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with TAMARA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TAMARA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TAMARA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with TAMARA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing TAMARA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Tamara-Syrupcreek complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes5882AO76513120221njk3or60720181:24000
Limberjim-Tamara complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes5875BU504531207942knk0or60720181:24000
Limberjim-Tamara complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes5875CO375931202921qqn7or60720181:24000
Syrupcreek-Tamara complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes5791AO345431207301sj31or60720181:24000
Olot-Limberjim-Tamara complex, complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes5998AW335431207451t16jor60720181:24000
Geisercreek-Tamara complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes3322AO243331207041sh5yor60720181:24000
Syrupcreek-Limberjim-Tamara complex, frost, 0 to 15 percent slopes5779AW235831207241sj2vor60720181:24000
Olot-Limberjim-Tamara complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes5998BW215931207471t16lor60720181:24000
Sheepcreek-Tamara-Anatone complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes6123AW121131207992ptgpor60720181:24000
Syrupcreek-Tamara complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes5791BO9913120219njk0or60720181:24000
Syrupcreek-Tamara-Limberjim complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes4969BE54331205021r199or60720181:24000
Syrupcreek-Limberjim-Tamara complex, landslide, 15 to 30 percent slopes4969BL31431205031r19bor60720181:24000
Limberjim-Tamara-Syrupcreek complex, frost, 15 to 30 percent slopes5919BF24831205672pgs6or60720181:24000
Tamara-Limberjim-Kamela complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4903CO21631204831r0zror60720181:24000
Syrupcreek-Tamara complex, frost, 30 to 60 percent slopes5903CF1413120220njk1or60720181:24000
Syrupcreek-Tamara-Limberjim complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes4969BE397931223151r199or62620181:24000
Syrupcreek-Limberjim-Tamara complex, frost, 0 to 15 percent slopes5779AW59831224851sj2vor62620181:24000
Tamara-Syrupcreek complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes5882AO5323122086njk3or62620181:24000
Syrupcreek-Tamara complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes5791AO40431224861sj31or62620181:24000
Syrupcreek-Tamara complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes5791BO1403122085njk0or62620181:24000
Syrupcreek-Limberjim-Tamara complex, landslide, 15 to 30 percent slopes4969BL11131223161r19bor62620181:24000
Syrupcreek-Limberjim-Tamara complex, landslide, 0 to 15 percent slopes4992AL10531223271r19xor62620181:24000
Tamara-Larabee complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes430C12283429513rcv8or6271:24000
Syrupcreek-Tamara complex, 40 to 70 percent north slopes432F6593431973zx7wor6271:24000
Tamara-Larabee complex, 20 to 50 percent north slopes430E5773432021rcv7or6271:24000
Limberjim-Tamara complex, 20 to 50 percent north slopes431E1993432143rcv6or6271:24000
Syrupcreek-Tamara-Limberjim complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes4969BE16634318791r199or6271:24000
Syrupcreek-Tamara complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes5791AO6534297811sj31or6271:24000
Syrupcreek-Limberjim-Tamara complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes, frost pocket5779AW234319132mc1sor6271:24000
Syrupcreek-Tamara complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes5791AO660524373191sj31or63120181:24000
Syrupcreek-Tamara complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes5791BO54982437320njk0or63120181:24000
Geisercreek-Tamara complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes3322AO209824867121sh5yor63120181:24000
Tamara-Syrupcreek complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes5882AO13842437403njk3or63120181:24000
Rebarrow-Tamara-Wonder complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes4164AW114324372141r0yjor63120181:24000
Limberjim-Tamara complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes5875CO94624373951qqn7or63120181:24000
Tamara-Limberjim-Kamela complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes5746AO197243728320brlor63120181:24000
Limberjim-Tamara-Syrupcreek complex, frost, 15 to 30 percent slopes5919BF10024868572pgs6or63120181:24000
Tamara-Limberjim-Kamela complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4903CO6124372271r0zror63120181:24000
Syrupcreek-Tamara complex, frost, 30 to 60 percent slopes5903CF602486856njk1or63120181:24000
Syrupcreek-Limberjim-Tamara complex, frost, 0 to 15 percent slopes5779AW2524868411sj2vor63120181:24000
Limberjim-Tamara complex, frost, 0 to 15 percent slopes5875AF72437394njb8or63120181:24000
Syrupcreek-Tamara complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes5791AO109225939601sj31or66719841:20000
Syrupcreek-Tamara complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes5791BO2572593961njk0or66719841:20000
Limberjim-Tamara complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes5875CO10731214471qqn7or66719841:20000
Tamara-Syrupcreek complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes31024372847042v4dor67019991:24000
Syrupcreek-Tamara complex, 15 to 30 percent north slopes3079376847012v49or67019991:24000
Tamara-Sherod complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes3091411847032v4cor67019991:24000
Syrupcreek-Tamara complex, 30 to 60 percent north slopes308424847022v4bor67019991:24000
Limberjim-Tamara complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes191262845652tzxor67019991:24000
Limberjim-Tamara complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes5875BU4631225702ygdrwa60319841:24000
Tamara-Syrupcreek complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes5882AO3531225512ygcjwa60319841:24000
Limberjim-Tamara complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes5875CO1431225552ygcnwa60319841:24000
Tamara-Syrupcreek complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes5882AO35131146302ygcjwa61319671:20000
Tamara-Syrupcreek complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes5882AO831146702ygcjwa62319701:20000
Limberjim-Tamara complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes5875BU831146852ygdrwa62319701:20000
Tamara-Syrupcreek complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes5882AO280531144662ygcjwa71420181:24000
Limberjim-Tamara complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes5875CO222831144712ygcnwa71420181:24000
Limberjim-Tamara complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes5875BU219831145032ygdrwa71420181:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the TAMARA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .