Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the TALKEETNA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of TALKEETNA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to TALKEETNA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
22479P040079AK170001Talkeetna5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties61.7333336,-151.4833374
22489P064889AK170009Talkeetna6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties62.25,-150.0333405
22481P0706S1981AK170001TALKEETNA6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties61.1666679,-151.5833282

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the TALKEETNA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

There are insufficient data to create the water balance bar figure.



There are insufficient data to create the water balance line figure.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the TALKEETNA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TALKEETNA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TALKEETNA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with TALKEETNA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TALKEETNA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TALKEETNA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with TALKEETNA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing TALKEETNA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Talkeetna, warm, and Talkeetna, thick surface soils, 15 to 45 percent slopes19146639503211pc8ak60019961:24000
Talkeetna, low elevation-Deneka, low elevation association, steep and moderately steep19228062503221pc9ak60019961:24000
Talkeetna, warm-Talkeetna, thick surface complex, hilly19025212503201pc7ak60019961:24000
Siwash-Talkeetna, cool-Snowdance association, 0 to 30 percent slopes18416895503141pc1ak60019961:24000
Talkeetna-Talkeetna, thick surface complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes18915334503191pc6ak60019961:24000
Talkeetna, cool-Snowdance complex, 5 to 25 percent slopes19411432503241pccak60019961:24000
Talkeetna, warm-Talkeetna, thick surface-Deneka complex, hilly19311419503231pcbak60019961:24000
Talkeetna, cool-Tsadaka-Chunilna, cool complex, 10 to 35 percent slopes1955107503251pcdak60019961:24000
Tsadaka-Talkeetna, cool complex, 5 to 25 percent slopes2023707503331pcnak60019961:24000
Talkeetna very fine sandy loam, warm, 15 to 35 percent slopes1882855503181pc5ak60019961:24000
Talkeetna-Chugach-Histic Cryaquepts association, cool, 10 to 70 percent slopes46015822605150n9pzak60520011:25000
Talkeetna-Chugach-Histic Cryaquepts association, 10 to 70 percent slopes4599920605149n9pyak60520011:25000
Talkeetna-Chugach-Deneka complex, 20 to 45 percent slopes4567209605138n9plak60520011:25000
Talkeetna-Chugach-Deneka complex, 45 to 85 percent slopes4576734605139n9pmak60520011:25000
Talkeetna-Deneka-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 85 percent slopes4612809605141n9ppak60520011:25000
Talkeetna-Chugach-Deneka complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes4551246605137n9pkak60520011:25000
Talkeetna-Chugach-Deneka complex, undulating and hilly458978605136n9pjak60520011:25000
Talkeetna silt loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes685425014881201lyhwak65220051:25000
Talkeetna silt loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes684286514881191lyhvak65220051:25000
Talkeetna-Starichkof complex, 0 to 25 percent slopes68699614881211lyhxak65220051:25000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the TALKEETNA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .