Soil Data Explorer - STIVERSVILLE

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the STIVERSVILLE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of STIVERSVILLE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to STIVERSVILLE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
n/a	40A4335	1960TN187025	Stiversville	5	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a
n/a	40A4337	1960TN187027	Stiversville	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a
n/a	40A5456	1965TN149004	Stiversville	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the STIVERSVILLE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the STIVERSVILLE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the STIVERSVILLE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the STIVERSVILLE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with STIVERSVILLE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the STIVERSVILLE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the STIVERSVILLE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with STIVERSVILLE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. TN-2012-03-19-40 | Williamson County - August 1964

   Major and minor soils and underlying parent materials in the Stiversville-Culleoka-Inman association (Soil Survey of Williamson County, TN; 1964).

Map Units

Map units containing STIVERSVILLE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Stiversville-Urban land complex, 3 to 25 percent slopes	SvD	15258	523442	kkp7	tn037	1977	1:15840
Stiversville loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes, eroded	StD	6079	523441	2v5bq	tn037	1977	1:15840
Stiversville loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	StC	6054	523440	2v5br	tn037	1977	1:15840
Stiversville loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes, eroded	SvE2	605	527087	2v5bq	tn041	1968	1:15840
Stiversville silt loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes, severely eroded	StC3	1590	527365	kprs	tn055	1965	1:15840
Marsh-Stiversville complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes, severely eroded	MaE3	5410	524084	klby	tn117	1999	1:24000
Stiversville loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	StC2	3046	524096	2v5br	tn117	1999	1:24000
Stiversville loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	StB	1489	524095	klc9	tn117	1999	1:24000
Stiversville loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes, eroded	StD2	1073	524097	2v5bq	tn117	1999	1:24000
Stiversville silty clay loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes, severely eroded	SeC3	241	560647	ltdd	tn135	2000	1:24000
Stiversville silt loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	StC	1665	528259	2v5bt	tn149	1974	1:15840
Stiversville silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes, eroded	StD	796	528260	2v5bv	tn149	1974	1:15840
Stiversville silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	StB	685	528258	2v5bs	tn149	1974	1:15840
Stiversville silt loam, 20 to 30 percent slopes, eroded	StE	472	528261	2v5bw	tn149	1974	1:15840
Stiversville silt loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	StC2	9843	523584	2v5bt	tn187	1961	1:15840
Stiversville silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	StB2	5968	523583	2v5bs	tn187	1961	1:15840
Culleoka silt loam, 20 to 35 percent slopes	CkE	3050	523486	kkqn	tn187	1961	1:15840
Culleoka silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes	CkD	2423	523484	kkql	tn187	1961	1:15840
Stiversville silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes, eroded	StD2	1991	523585	2v5bv	tn187	1961	1:15840
Stiversville clay loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes, severely eroded	SrC3	1617	523581	kktq	tn187	1961	1:15840
Culleoka silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes, severely eroded	CkD3	946	523485	kkqm	tn187	1961	1:15840
Stiversville clay loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes, severely eroded	SrD3	931	523582	kktr	tn187	1961	1:15840
Culleoka silt loam, 20 to 35 percent slopes, severely eroded	CkE3	553	523487	kkqp	tn187	1961	1:15840
Culleoka silt loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes	CkC	247	523483	kkqk	tn187	1961	1:15840
Stiversville silt loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	StC2	4905	528485	2v5bt	tn189	1988	1:20000
Stiversville silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes, eroded	StD2	3030	528486	2v5bv	tn189	1988	1:20000
Stiversville silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	StB	1272	528484	2v5bs	tn189	1988	1:20000
Stiversville silt loam, 20 to 30 percent slopes, eroded	StE2	831	528487	2v5bw	tn189	1988	1:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the STIVERSVILLE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).